this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
217 points (99.1% liked)
Not The Onion
19564 readers
2096 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm going to preface this by stating that it's my assumption and not fact:
O'Leary isn't daft. I don't like him and I don't like Ryanair, but he's done well with the brand from a financial perspective, in an industry that's all about the fine margins.
I'm quite sure your view is correct, it's probably only about the numbers - for better or worse. If Starlink was a cheaper alternative to most in the market, and their projected connectivity sales outweigh the operating and capital costs, there'd be Starlink all over Ryanair planes. As it happens, the numbers probably look a deep red on the spreadsheet so it's in the "fuck right off" box.
I've no love for either of them but it's still nice to see Elon getting a poke in the eye.
I assume people are buying Ryanair tickets because they don't want to spend any more money than absolutely necessary. So he's probably right about the low rate of purchasers.
Of course Elon would be upset that the business case doesn't work for someone.
Assuming the 5% estimate is correct, the back-of-an-envelope math is pretty easy.
Their annual report says 200M passengers in 2024-2025 financial year.
If they wanted to pay off the hardware in 5 years they'd spend a total of €750M on it and additional fuel, potentially being paid by 50M (5% of 1B) passengers, necessitating a minimum €15 charge to break even.
That is before you consider paying interest on a loan for purchasing the hardware, signage (their website says they have 643 planes with a total of 122,941 seats, just printing an information card for each seat back could be a substantial cost), staff training, the cost of the time each plane is out of service for the installation, etc, etc.
Could you try a lower price and hope that more people pay? Sure, but that feels pretty risky, and I'm sure they thought about that too.
Much as I enjoy having WiFi on flights and all, agree with the other posters here that it just ain't adding up.