I wonder where the free ticket is to.
Maybe it only covers half the flight. Ok this is where you jump off
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
Posts must be:
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
I wonder where the free ticket is to.
Maybe it only covers half the flight. Ok this is where you jump off
Idk, I think he looked at the numbers. Starlink is a bad bet.
O'Leary added that the cost of installing Starlink would be €250m (£218m) to fit all necessary equipment — and would increase fuel costs by €100m (£87m) per year.
He said he thinks only 5% of Ryanair passengers would pay for wifi, so there would be poor return on investment.
thinking about it: a ryanair flight lasts how long on average? an hour?
I'm going to preface this by stating that it's my assumption and not fact:
O'Leary isn't daft. I don't like him and I don't like Ryanair, but he's done well with the brand from a financial perspective, in an industry that's all about the fine margins.
I'm quite sure your view is correct, it's probably only about the numbers - for better or worse. If Starlink was a cheaper alternative to most in the market, and their projected connectivity sales outweigh the operating and capital costs, there'd be Starlink all over Ryanair planes. As it happens, the numbers probably look a deep red on the spreadsheet so it's in the "fuck right off" box.
I've no love for either of them but it's still nice to see Elon getting a poke in the eye.
I assume people are buying Ryanair tickets because they don't want to spend any more money than absolutely necessary. So he's probably right about the low rate of purchasers.
Of course Elon would be upset that the business case doesn't work for someone.
Assuming the 5% estimate is correct, the back-of-an-envelope math is pretty easy.
Their annual report says 200M passengers in 2024-2025 financial year.
If they wanted to pay off the hardware in 5 years they'd spend a total of €750M on it and additional fuel, potentially being paid by 50M (5% of 1B) passengers, necessitating a minimum €15 charge to break even.
That is before you consider paying interest on a loan for purchasing the hardware, signage (their website says they have 643 planes with a total of 122,941 seats, just printing an information card for each seat back could be a substantial cost), staff training, the cost of the time each plane is out of service for the installation, etc, etc.
Could you try a lower price and hope that more people pay? Sure, but that feels pretty risky, and I'm sure they thought about that too.
Much as I enjoy having WiFi on flights and all, agree with the other posters here that it just ain't adding up.
Isn't Ryanair's business model short flights, and at rock bottom prices? If their customer base is people looking to pay the minimum amount, for a short flight, I'd say very few would pay for WiFi.
I took Ryanair once and I'm sure they would price it at "I'd use it only at a gunpoint" level
Plus most flights are ultra short. Are people so addicted that they can't be offline for 30 minutes? In the time they can enjoy the Ryanair staff selling the lottery raffle tickets or asking everyone if they want to drink a €3 cup of water or if want to buy cigarettes at full retail prices
Is there some way that O'Leary and Musk could mutually annihilate?
book them a ryanair flight
Make sure the plane's Boeing
if it helps to boost Ryanair sales, you could insult me all day, every day.
Greed is a mental illness.
Give me twenty bucks and you can call me an asshole.
I mean, you can call me an asshole anyway, but I'll take your twenty bucks.
It also annoyingly shows a level of thick skin and confidence that Musk does not possess.