For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
Community: "free of ML influence"
or "I TOTALLY SUPPORT THE ANARCHISTS DOING TERROR ATTACKS ON THE MARXIST-LENINISTS SAVING US FROM FASCISM!"
What a lack of Marxism-Leninism and historical materialism does to a mf. Literal kindergarten level leftism. These are the same people who will argue that it's the Bolsheviks ackchually who made it possible for fascists to win the Spanish civil war by repressing anarchists (no sources provided)
No, insulin is a terrible example and so is glassware. Glassware, especially specialised glassware, was famously one of the last holds out of artisan craftsmanship against industrialised processes.
You are arguing with a strawman, and you are arguing using an example that fits their argument best. Your example is bad.
Brilliant reading comprehension my guy.
I guess all the examples I presented for why disappear. I guess I also somehow argued for general glassware rather than mentioning eyeglasses and then going in detail for chemical-grade glassware for the production of insulin for millions. Seeing as how you consider these arguments bad, let me present ones that equal the ones you present.
Nuh-uh, they're good.
I was not aware this was how arguing was done well, so thank you for enlightening me. I also appreciate knowing that complex supply of all the resources, knowledge and so on needed to produce insulin for everyone who needs it disappears because you say so. Wish you'd use that power for better stuff than formatting a response to a guy online.
I starten nød jeg at du præsenterede heterodoxe idéer, men med tiden er det blevet tydeligt du bare er en tumpe med en træls adfærd. Du er dårlig til at engagere dig med tekst og folk der er uenige med dig, og din vidensbasis er langt under hvad du lader til at tro den er. Så nu blokerer jeg dig. Det er en skam, til at begynde med var dine tendenser en frisk brise, men med tiden er du blevet til en uduelig knark. Håber du vokser ud af det.
Being this offended about my reply isn't impressive. Plenty of people get mad, you're not special. Your point is about the need for spcialised industrial labor and your examples are a thing that can be made with relatively simple tools and animal agriculture and the actual last refuge of artisan craftsmanship. I just don't know what to tell you, you want to argue for industrialistion and you chose two bad examples, and being mad that this is highlighted won't change that.