this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
793 points (90.8% liked)

Flippanarchy

2056 readers
810 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 143 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Imagine the world we’d live in if those corpo fucks didn’t screw over Bernie

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Probably better than what we have now in many ways but don't get your hopes too high from people who belong to the current establishment. In europe plenty of "good" politicians from alternative parties won elections and guess what? Once in power they didn't do shit of what they promised and ended up licking the boot or corporations like anyone else.

[–] goferking0 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Or persecuted Nixon, or Reagan, or Bush Sr, or didn't give up when gore "lost" to bush jr

[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] goferking0 5 points 16 hours ago

Not like they did anything so not really much of a difference

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No see taking office when elected by hoth popular AND electoral vote is divisive and bad politics. You dumbfuck commies understand nothing about politics. Now drink my slushy poop without making any faces and be my slave forever OR YOU ARE LITERALLY A FASCIST AND IM CALLING ICE ON YOU

[–] goferking0 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You dumbfuck commies understand nothing about politics. Now drink my slushy poop without making any faces and be my slave forever OR YOU ARE LITERALLY A FASCIST AND IM CALLING ICE ON YOU

Ah yes totally goes with saying we should punish/investigate criminals instead of going we must only look forward not back so the country can heal. We can't do anything about past crimes

Doing anything about past crimes is impossible, sorry. Also currently ongoing crimes.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Or if harris had literally a single electoral group she didnt actively spray shit on

Or if clinton hadnt helped trump win

Or...

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is true. Have to be fair.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I got this shit from him after Oct. 7 so don't be so sure

He has moved away from being this outright shit since then, I will concede.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

He would have been absolutely hamstrung by the the bullshit factory that is the legislature, and nothing good would have happened that wasn’t undone immediately by the next administration.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

He didn't need congress to sell weapons for genocide.

He just needed congress when it was shit he didn't want to do.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Haven’t you been reading the news? Apparently you don’t need congress.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People are OK with auth right. But auth left? Oh no, that's not gonna happen. The military would coup the shit out of that real quick.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Auth Left is still inherently abusive.

No matter how much you pretend that it's for the greater good, authoritarianism will always be detrimental to the relatively powerless masses.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using authority against billionaires is good actually

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's not like auth left stops there.

You can have egalitarian taxation and common sense regulations without being generally authoritarian, and you should.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So we’re to show no authority against billionaires and their enforcers (police) and validators (law workers/politicians) because it might go too far? Slippery slope claims tend to just reinforce the status quo since it stops people from doing anything functional. The status quo is definitively authoritarian.

Not saying that it has to, but is there an example of “without being generally authoritarian” out there in the wild somewhere? Because imo every country on earth uses authority to uphold some class structure and my country, even if we had all the things we wanted to make us happier (affordable housing, free medical care and education, public transit, etc) it would still show authority over the global south to maintain itself.

[–] BlueDemon 1 points 4 hours ago

Iirc the Spanish and Ukrainian anarchists were doing a good job of that while fighting off fascists and monarchists before the communists stabbed them in the back.

Also the Zapatistas have some territories and practice direct democracy.

My line is you can use force, organised even, but don't give the state a tool that can, and historically has been, turned on you

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh I'm not pretending anything. Just saying that auth left would never get as far as Trump is getting.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

auth left would never get as far as Trump is getting.

History would very much disagree with you.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not talking about history. Talking about what would happen today.

And I'm pointing out that history repeats itself when you don't learn from it.

Just like the fascists of today are fucking shit up like the ones in 1920s-40s Europe, the auth left extremists would fuck shit up like the likes of Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot.

The horseshoe theory shitlibs trot out to defame the left may be bullshit (definitely is), but auth left oppresses people because it's auth.

You just don't get good things from a select group excessively controlling everybody, no matter which group that is and how good their initial intentions are.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

“People” or Russian bots?

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also true.

Not that there’s really any “winning” here but it’s nice to dream of the imaginary reprieve we never got.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Life is pain, highness. Anyone who says different is selling you something.