politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
You really saved us all with your... not voting?
Man.. how many bricks to the side of y'all's head do we have to take to get you to understand that a) an election isn't about individual choice, and b) telling people what to do with their votes is counter productive.
If you were doing in 2023/24 what you are doing now, with that comment: You're why fascism won.
You aren't part of the collective that got it right. You're being the shit lib who handed the world to the fascists.
Fascism won because millions of people refused to vote against it, because the alternative wasn't perfect.
Stop blaming the people who literally voted against fascism. Does believing in harm reduction make one a "shitlib" in your view?
Fascism won because the Democratic party didn't want to adopt an anti-genocide stance. Its not harm reduction when it enables the harm. Its not strategic voting when the strategy backfires.
You're an apologist for fascism if you are blaming voters.
Biden and Harris were nowhere near as bad for Gaza as trump is, and papering over that detail hasn't helped the situation
An entire fucking genocide happened under their "deeply concerned" watch bruh.
Stop apologizing for fascism.
Trump is the fascist. I'm not apologizing for fascism, I hate it with a burning passion. I'm simply stating that anyone who allowed him to get elected was enabling fascism.
Stop trying to obfuscate things by acting like Biden and Harris were as bad as trump.
Saying something over and over doesn't mean its true.
That said, I hate both the DNC and the non-voters. I can do both. If free will exists, then I can blame both. (I mean I don't believe in free will, but on an emotional level fuck both anyway, I don't owe either of them shit.)
You hated the DNC so much you voted for them and defend their actions tooth and nail?
I voted for them for tactical purposes. Both because at the time I cared about the well being of my fellow human beings and I care about my own well being. These days I'm not so sure I care about humans or even myself. I'm still grappling with the point of it all now that we're doomed.
I understand that tactics aren't likely your strong suit, so let me make it clear: I do not have to love the democrats as a party to vote for them. I just have to have a basic grip on reality that it was either them or fascism. Because its first past the post we are dealing with.
Well then tactically you fucked up lol
You either don't understand what tactics mean or you have some really Pepe Silvia shit to share with me.
You voted for genocide and still lost. Tactical and strategic woopsie.
Everyone has lost, and there's more genocide.
Well there's the same amount of genocide. But yes, we agree, and that means voting this way was a tactical and strategic failure.
Ah yes, because giving Trump the win instead has ended genocide and improved the lives of millions
I am saying that objectively looking at the outcome of the election means that running and supporting a pro genocide campaign was a tactical and strategic failure. You shouldn't do that in the future.
Oh. Yes, agreed
Jfc you idiot. YOU STILL GAVE TRUMP THE WIN!!
Who do you think helped prop up and build the foundations for fascism? That's what your tactics resulted in.
Denying reality over and over again doesn't make you right and the perspective you are espousing was the dominant narrative up until the elective. That individually voters just needed to "do better". You want to blame voters; you need them to win elections. Explain to me how you plan on getting back the 6% of Democratic voters you lost using your approach? You blamed them for failure before the contest was even run and they didn't show up for you. Now what? How does your analysis change their minds into showing up?
What you are doing is the same thing petroleum companies did around recycling in the 90s. By believing this is some negotiation of individual choice, you are obscuring the fact that the Democrats structurally undermined their own ability to stop fascism. Blaming the individual is why fascism won.
I don't need to win shit anymore. I don't care, its obviously a fool's errand to give a shit. The 2024 US election taught me that. All worrying about politics does is hurt me and waste my time with fools.
All that's left is rot, so I'm going to pick through the garbage and hope to find some gems before we all drown in shit. My analysis is just based on brutal reality. They did not show up "for themselves" as well. Its not just me they've hurt. Leopards are eating faces, and not all the owners of those faces are "shitlibs" and MAGA, some of them are protestors who didn't vote.
There is no means for me to change people's minds on voting so you don't need worry about me trying. I just want people to understand that the very virtue obsessed moral framework they are using to make their decision to not vote has hurt them. Its doomed them. I want them to feel bad about it because in so far that someone can deserve to feel bad about it, they definitely should.
No its not. In a purely rational sense, I don't really blame anyone. Free will doesn't actually exist.
But within the context of people I can like, dislike, or hate as the emotional creature that I am: I definitely can fucking loathe multiple groups at the same time and feel catharsis at their suffering.
I think you are still operating under the delusion that this second Trump term is something we will escape from, but the thing is, bad times don't create good times. They create more bad times. We are in the gravity well of a metaphorical political and environmental black hole, and you are in denial.
The dems will win in 2028, and it wont matter much, other than we'll get some sweet painkillers as we pass into oblivion. Because the GOP will win in 2032. Or society will completely collapse. Or the globe will roast all of our food and we'll all starve. There are not much in the way of good things to look forward to.
I can see both sides of this. Yes, the moral and proper thing to do is to be anti-genocide and to take an anti-Israal, anti-Zionist position after the Gaza invasion. We were right to insist upon it as a condition for our vote and whoever the Dem nominee was should have taken a hard anti-Gaza war stance. However, the reality of the situation is that the vile monsters that control the party didn't listen to us and ignored or talked around this issue for those sweet, sweet AIPAC dollars. We all know that they didn't listen to us for an entire year. This was the reality on election day.
Knowing this, if you still voted for Trump, a third party, or "not at all" on election day instead of holding your nose and voting for Harris, you are just as responsible for the fascism we have now as any shitlib who was screaming at anyone and everyone to "fuck off, and fall in line" or "vote blue no matter who" before and during the election.
You didn't have to tell anyone you were going vote for Harris. In fact, we should have been telling the Dem party that we will refuse to vote for them right up until the end. Hell, you can still deny today that you ever voted for Harris in 2024, as long as you actually did in secret.
Great. Then just keep it all to yourself then. All bottled up deep inside so you don't hand the fascists another victory.
No lol, eat shit, scumbag.
Still insistent on the delusions I see.
You don't deserve charity. You objectively supported fascism with your actions. And now youre saying you don't care enough to stop it.
You really saved us with your.. supporting genocide?
If you allowed trump to win, you supported genocide.
If you allowed Harris to think she could win while supporting genocide, you supported genocide. The only way to get to a "no genocide" outcome was for you to participate in making it clear to Harris that it was a non-negotiable point. But you centrists couldnt be bothered to even vote uncommitted in the "primary".
You let genocide exist within the democratic party. Thats why innocents are dead. Because you felt OK negotiating other peoples existence for whatever your hot button issues were. You were 100% willing to throw nameless browns into the gears of the US government to keep the big machine oiled and lurching forward. Grow some ethics and you'll win more elections.
If the party machine 100% needs blood sacrifice to function, then it needs to be destroyed. But thats the thing isnt it. It doesnt need that sacrifice, you just allowed it because you're a lazy unprincipled centrist with no respect or empathy for your fellow humans.
Innocents were dead either way. What's worse, ten thousand dead innocents or a hundred thousand dead innocents?
What's your answer to the trolley problem? Do you let ten people die because you don't want the moral culpability of one person's death?
Combine that with the "drowning child" thought experiment. If you witness a child drowning in a pond, do you have a moral responsibility to save them? If you simply walk away, are you less morally culpable for that child's death?
My answer to the trolley problem is to physically stop the people tying others to the tracks when that was never necessary or helpful.
So your actual answer is that you turned your back and played make believe, while deluding yourself into thinking you chose the best option and that everyone else in the world was at fault. Meanwhile you had no effect on stopping a genocide.
And neither did you. At least my way could have worked. Yours was utter BS from the very start.
I voted third party. The allure of being hated by the entire country for my voting decisions is too compelling to pass up.
So did I. And if the rest of the lib population had any actual ethics third party would have won
You mean Jill Stein who shows up ever 4 years, runs for the president, siphoning off 2 to 3% of the liberal vote over a single issue, collects a check, and then disappears for 4 years. That's not a real third party, that's a grift.
She can't siphon votes that were never going to the DNC to begin with. Where's any of the DNC leaders right now when we have ice arresting and killing citizens, trump running all over the constitution, a house rep tweeted today that someone should tell trump to do his job, and if she's not that someone elected into office to do just that. Jill on the other hand is actually attending protests in support of the working class.
Where is she now?
Was last in Wisconsin protesting against ICE. Trump is beating the drums of war, where are democrats that are actually in office that can stop it?
I voted third party