this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
1189 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

19398 readers
1839 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

It's only more efficient when the containing square is large enough that there would be wasted space on the edges if the inner squares were lined up as a grid. The outer square of the waffle iron is almost but not quite large enough to fit a 4x5 grid. People losing their minds over this weird configuration being "more efficient" think it's because it's more efficient than a grid where all the space is used, which is not what this would be.

[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 4 points 13 hours ago

the joke is about achieving max density of the squares, density as in square per area of the waffle

of course you can make the whole waffle bigger, but it would decrease the density

a better solution is adding smaller squares though

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, if you have extra space but not enough for another row or column, just adjust the size of the inner squares.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, there's a lot of unused space there. Or just look at the gap in the middle of that row of 4. A slightly smaller square could have fit a 5x5, even.

It's a novelty, not an optimization.