this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
829 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

19687 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Maybe they shouldn't have been refering to it as OBSERVATION then poindexters, don't get mad when you confuse the laymen and he get annoyed.

For real, the amount of "smart" people saying this actually had an effect via human sight had me not understand how this shit worked for years cuz that made absolutely no sense, as it turned out all those 'smart' people turned out to just be parrots not understanding wtf they're talking about.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I totally agree. "Observe" was a bad choice of words, but it stuck. It should have been "interacted with", or "measured", or something like that.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 2 days ago

BTW, before a detector aparatus can be created, many physics results were (are?) identified through observation, which might include a measurement or might be qualitative.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

The point is that you can't observe anything without some kind of interaction. Even just looking at something requires bouncing light off of it.

We're used to our observations seeming passive because light is often hitting the things anyways, but the double slit experiment forces the point because the subjects of the experiment are so small that even just using ways of observing them affects the outcome of the experiment.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Sincerely yes, we can just stop saying observation and start saying interaction or something else less confusing