this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
380 points (99.7% liked)

News

36835 readers
1770 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Data from Vanguard shows Americans are pulling money out of their retirement accounts early at record rates to help make ends meet.

Last year, 6% of Vanguard's clients took a hardship withdrawal, which allows them to access funds in tax-advantaged retirement accounts, such as a 401(k), before they reach retirement age. That was up from 4.8% in 2024, the asset management giant said.

Taking a hardship withdrawal is not ideal for a few reasons, one of them being that investors are subject to a withdrawal penalty of 10% for taking money out of their account before 59½. On top of that, they are then taxed on any gains. However, perhaps most importantly, they rob themselves of future growth potential on that money, especially if they are still far from retirement age.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Why the actual fuck do we need to pay a penalty on our own money? We put the money in, it’s my fucking money. I love how something absolutely fucked up needs to happen just so you get the luxury of paying a fee on TOP OF fucking your savings over just so you can get over the hurdle of what ever terrible happened.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That's just one reason 401k is shitty. 401k was invented by Wall Street to enable them to use our retirement money as "float" and collect fees on top of that. It was sold to companies as a less expensive replacement for the pension plans most jobs used to offer back in the day. It was sold to employees as a "set it and forget it" way to do "investing", and somehow became the default option.

A 401k just rides on top of the stock market and gives the bare minimum of control to the user. Everyone has the same shitty dozen or so conglomerated investment funds to choose from. All that while the operators collect fees that might seem small to the layperson, but if those fees were allowed to compound they would actually make a massive difference in their wealth over a long career.

If your company offers a match, yeah, take the free money. Sometimes you're allowed to take loans as well which can help if you have tons of debt. (The cool thing about those is the interest gets paid into your own account). Otherwise, basically anything else is the way to go, whether that's a self-directed IRA or even just a regular brokerage account, real estate, literally anything. The only problem being the learning curve, but learning is more accessible than ever. If you really don't want to learn there are also broker-managed accounts now that are fairly cheap.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Because Mitt Romney needs three fucking private islands and if that means you have to suffer, so be it.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 15 hours ago

Finally, a real fucking response.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 20 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Because that was the deal to be allowed to invest that money without paying taxes

The goal, at a societal level, is the incentivize keeping it in a retirement fund

You can always pay yaxes and invest the money in a brokerage account if you don't want to risk penalties

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Putting fees on early withdrawals actually disincentivizes people from using 401ks or Roth IRAs. I’ve been unemployed for 3 of the last 5 years and I know that I will not be investing in retirement accounts until I have several years of steady employment under my belt, simply because I know I may need that money. The job market simply isn’t stable enough for me to even think about parking my money somewhere I can’t access it. I know I’m not alone.

I get what you’re saying but they should at least allow you to withdraw if you become unemployed.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

That’s fine but why does the incentive become a hurdle when life gets in the way? If I lost my job, and my house, and needed money, getting penalized for having life happens doesn’t look like an incentive anymore.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Because if you didn't do that, everyone would put 100% of their money into their 401k (at least up to the contribution limit) and then withdraw it right back out to avoid paying taxes on it.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

You pay taxes when you withdraw. The 10% is additional penalty for early withdrawal.

You are generally better off doing a loan if your plan allows since you pay yourself back with interest. Of course that requires you to be employed and planning on staying at that job until it's repaid.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You pay income taxes when you withdraw (meaning withdrawals are treated as income). However, 401ks also have the benefit of not being taxed while they grow. So you can contribute money pre-tax and don't pay taxes while the money grows.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes of course but what we're discussing here is ramifications of early withdrawal. There is a 10% penalty on top of the regular income tax.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Fair, I was trying to add context on why there is a penalty. Should have made that more clear.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I understand that, but the other user can't seem to imagine why they won't let you withdraw this tax-free income without any sort of penalty.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They said they can't understand why they have to pay a penalty not why they have to pay income tax.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

And my comment was regarding the reasoning why they charge the penalty. It's not a rainy day savings account.

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Because the cost of the agreement is the promise not to withdrawal. Otherwise you're asking for something for nothing.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

So I should have foresight to years later if I may have a life altering instance happening in my future?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

Yes typically you would build an emergency fund before investing money so that you're prepared with a plan for a life altering event same as investing in a 401k is preparing for retirement.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Also makes everyone with a 401k push for lower taxes long term.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Taxes exist to shape behavior. The behavior they wanted to shape was to get you to save for your own retirement.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Taxes should exist to create and fund the things that hold society together. There should be incentives to save money for retirement. Those do not always need to overlap.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Taxes should exist to create and fund the things that hold society together.

IOW: shape behavior.