this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
359 points (99.7% liked)

News

36835 readers
1821 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Data from Vanguard shows Americans are pulling money out of their retirement accounts early at record rates to help make ends meet.

Last year, 6% of Vanguard's clients took a hardship withdrawal, which allows them to access funds in tax-advantaged retirement accounts, such as a 401(k), before they reach retirement age. That was up from 4.8% in 2024, the asset management giant said.

Taking a hardship withdrawal is not ideal for a few reasons, one of them being that investors are subject to a withdrawal penalty of 10% for taking money out of their account before 59½. On top of that, they are then taxed on any gains. However, perhaps most importantly, they rob themselves of future growth potential on that money, especially if they are still far from retirement age.

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beeen132@feddit.org 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You all should pull out. It's obviously a scam of the ~1% holding 90% financial markets. They're draining your money. How can the economy provide a livable retirement in the future when it can't provide a livable present?

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

This is just nonsense why is it being upvoted just because it's 'leftist shaped'?

The stock market is the primary means of wealth transfer from the working class to the owning class. For a working person buying stocks allows you to recapture some of that wealth transfer.

You don't get to opt out of the wealth transfer part of this by not owning stocks, you're just letting the already wealthy increase their share of the extraction.

How can the economy provide a livable retirement in the future when it can’t provide a livable present?

This is either meaningless or even worse, anarcho-primitivism. Assuming you meant the stock market then the people who are extremely wealthy with passive income from stocks are certainly living off it.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Why the actual fuck do we need to pay a penalty on our own money? We put the money in, it’s my fucking money. I love how something absolutely fucked up needs to happen just so you get the luxury of paying a fee on TOP OF fucking your savings over just so you can get over the hurdle of what ever terrible happened.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because Mitt Romney needs three fucking private islands and if that means you have to suffer, so be it.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago

Finally, a real fucking response.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Because that was the deal to be allowed to invest that money without paying taxes

The goal, at a societal level, is the incentivize keeping it in a retirement fund

You can always pay yaxes and invest the money in a brokerage account if you don't want to risk penalties

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

Putting fees on early withdrawals actually disincentivizes people from using 401ks or Roth IRAs. I’ve been unemployed for 3 of the last 5 years and I know that I will not be investing in retirement accounts until I have several years of steady employment under my belt, simply because I know I may need that money. The job market simply isn’t stable enough for me to even think about parking my money somewhere I can’t access it. I know I’m not alone.

I get what you’re saying but they should at least allow you to withdraw if you become unemployed.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

That’s fine but why does the incentive become a hurdle when life gets in the way? If I lost my job, and my house, and needed money, getting penalized for having life happens doesn’t look like an incentive anymore.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because if you didn't do that, everyone would put 100% of their money into their 401k (at least up to the contribution limit) and then withdraw it right back out to avoid paying taxes on it.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

You pay taxes when you withdraw. The 10% is additional penalty for early withdrawal.

You are generally better off doing a loan if your plan allows since you pay yourself back with interest. Of course that requires you to be employed and planning on staying at that job until it's repaid.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You pay income taxes when you withdraw (meaning withdrawals are treated as income). However, 401ks also have the benefit of not being taxed while they grow. So you can contribute money pre-tax and don't pay taxes while the money grows.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yes of course but what we're discussing here is ramifications of early withdrawal. There is a 10% penalty on top of the regular income tax.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Fair, I was trying to add context on why there is a penalty. Should have made that more clear.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I understand that, but the other user can't seem to imagine why they won't let you withdraw this tax-free income without any sort of penalty.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They said they can't understand why they have to pay a penalty not why they have to pay income tax.

[–] ChexMax@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Because the cost of the agreement is the promise not to withdrawal. Otherwise you're asking for something for nothing.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So I should have foresight to years later if I may have a life altering instance happening in my future?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

Yes typically you would build an emergency fund before investing money so that you're prepared with a plan for a life altering event same as investing in a 401k is preparing for retirement.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Also makes everyone with a 401k push for lower taxes long term.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Taxes exist to shape behavior. The behavior they wanted to shape was to get you to save for your own retirement.

[–] traxex@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Taxes should exist to create and fund the things that hold society together. There should be incentives to save money for retirement. Those do not always need to overlap.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Taxes should exist to create and fund the things that hold society together.

IOW: shape behavior.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

All part of the plan. Work until the janitor finds you at your desk, Slave!

[–] asim0v@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I had to do this once. Had car issues due to running over a crowbar that somehow bounced up and hit my car. I heard and felt the impact, saw smoke in my rear view mirror, and immediately pulled off the highway into a parking lot. I got out and a soon as I turned the car off all of the oil poured out. The oil pan got ripped, and later found out the engine got damaged.

Mechanic and insurance both decided it was least expensive to spend $9k parts and labor to replace the engine rather than total the car. I had to pay $3,000 for the deductible. Being young, renting, and making $11/hr, I didn’t have that kind of savings. I did have the money in my 401k.

My 401k allowed me to take a loan out against my 401k. It would get deducted out of my paycheck each week until it was paid off. The advantage to this was there was no interest, but I did have to pay a 10% penalty for early withdrawal, so I ended up having to take out more than $3k to cover the penalty.

Only other catch was if I quit or were fired before repaying the full amount the remainder of the balance was due the next month - and I was close to quitting to change careers. A few months later got a much better job in IT but could not repay the loan amount, so I “defaulted” on it which isn’t as bad as it sounds. The loan amount just gets reported to the IRS as income, and I had to pay taxes on the full amount in addition to the penalty.

Not ideal at all, but being young-ish and only having the option to try and get a loan from a traditional lender at a much higher interest rate would have been worse.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

When I took a 401k loan, you paid yourself back at 5% interest I believe. That makes up (mostly) for having the money you borrowed out of you portfolio. You should not have had to pay the 10% penalty size you didn't take a distribution.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 6 points 12 hours ago

Damn good job navigating through that so well man

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Before Trump finds a way to siphon them dry no doubt. Also,people are out of work and under paid

[–] Kayday@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember my dad emptying his retirement savings in the wake of '08. Super fun to be experiencing all this again. Troops in the middle east for extra nostalgia.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Gosh, damn. Exact same story here too. If we could just go back and tell them, right?

My dad was upset and panicked "Every time Obama opens his mouth we've lost more money!"

I didn't get how any of this worked back then. I still don't completely but I was just a kid. I wish I could have just convinced him to chill and wait it out. (And I knew enough to tell him to turn off the "24/7 screaming heads channel" but was unsuccessful...)

The upheaval that followed was not a positive life experience...

So freaking sad reliving all of this again and seeing people either haven't learned to not panic-pull or are just that terribly desperate.

Weirdly, with my meager means, I'm trying to figure out where to put money in... y'know just in case this thing starts working again like it's turned around in the past...

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not ideal, but keeping food on the table, a roof over your head, and light/heat running are going to be bigger priorities than worrying about a tomorrow that might not come, anyway.

[–] half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 day ago

Yeah, the real dystopian truth is that people who are able to pull from a retirement account as a stop-gap are in a much more fortunate position than countless peers who live paycheck-to-paycheck and haven't been able to squirrel anything significant away.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

This is exactly my mindset these days. I never managed to get ahead, hell i barely ever managed to catch up. I've been paranoid in the past about my inability to put aside any savings, but now i don't even think it matters. In the end, the healthcare industry will ultimately take all of my money--there's no way i can afford treatment for even minor problems, much less the big stuff that lies in wait for us when we get older. So why bother trying to create a savings--just to have them take it all away? So i can squeak a couple more years of life, penniless after having battled cancer? Fuck that.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Boomers traded stable pension funds (minus the occasional embezzlement scandal here and there) for funding your retirement based on gambling in the stock market....

My parents are getting rekt right now....

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

A boomer should have very little money in stocks at this point since they're so volatile. As you get closer to retirement, its better to transfer your investments to something more stable like bonds.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Must be fake news. Trump himself said usa does better than ever. Prices down, afordability up, gas almost free, more jobs, more profit, all ~~wars~~ special ops won in a day and foreign countries pay for all that via tariffs /s

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

“They’re begging to make a deal, we can go wherever we want”

I feel like he’s talking to the American people, telling us we better drop the Epstein shit or he’ll invade more countries and thereby ruin ours even harder

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

You will own nothing. You won't even be happy. You just own nothing.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Buy the dip?

I'd like to get back to contributing, but I'm getting close to 12 months unemployed. :(

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

almost 2 years over here. As much as I hate what such a stupid thing it would be I am hoping trump will try to termporarily improve the economy by allow people to take money out after age 50. Lots of folks will be on social security with no savings in a few years. After he is gone of course. OMS at least I hope he will be gone.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 8 points 1 day ago

I thought it's because they don't trust the money to be there anymore in a few years (or be worth nothing), but apparently it's mostly because of economical struggle.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Really sucks for them because the market has been fucked to hell by trump and his anti-Epstein-attention event