1214
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rah@feddit.uk 125 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why not prefer apartments in your own town?

Noise. Neighbours being closer.

[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 80 points 1 year ago

That’s only true if the apartment is a shitty American 5 over 1 stick building. In a modern concrete apartment with concrete internal walls you wouldn’t hear the neighbors.

[-] blueson@feddit.nu 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. Here in Sweden if you live into a newly built apartement you are basically guranteed grade A sound isolation.

Even older ones usually hold high quality because of renovations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

You don't even need concrete. I'm in a modern building made from mass timber construction, and it's dead quiet inside my apartment -- except for the hum of my AC and the sounds of my cat meowing whenever he wants attention.

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

You'd think living in a building that was built in 2020 would be good enough. But here I am every night cursing my neighbors who stomp around at 11pm

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Blame shitty government regulations and capitalism for shitty apartments.

The minimum standard we should expect is that you can pound a punching bag at 3am without your neighbours hearing anything.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

100% we need better regulation

[-] theparadox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, I live in a America and can't wait to get out of apartments. I've moved a lot in my life and have a lower middle class income. I've never found an apartment or condo where I didn't have to deal with hearing neighbors yelling, stomping, talking outside my front door in the hallway, opening sliding doors, listening to music, etc. Only twice, when I lived with a friend in their house, did I feel like I had any peace or privacy.

Sure, there would be lawns mowed and all that, but I'd take that over the things I've heard and worried about my neighbors having heard.

If I could have real privacy in an apartment I could afford I'd continue to rent, assuming I don't get priced out of the market completely at this rate.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The entire reason your prices out is that there aren't enough apartments though.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

This is the shit that exhausts me about NIMBYs. They have cause and effect totally reversed and I don't know how that myth got so ingrained.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Exactly! We've gotten into this weird feedback loop where NIMBY policies like restrictive zoning and parking minimums and setback requirements have made there be a systemic shortage of housing in total, but particularly a shortage of dense, walkable housing near transit. This has warped the market such that large houses on large plots of land -- which are objectively the luxury housing option -- are cheaper than apartments or condos in a dense, walkable community near transit. This makes people think density = expensive, which makes people think we need to get rid of density for the sake of affordability, which just makes the shortage even more severe!

Utter insanity

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Ownership. You will not own your apartment, it will be owned by your landlord and you will pay him whatever he demands. You will not own the forest, either. The state will, or some private entity will. No trespassing.

[-] J4g2F@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago

You can still own and buy appartements in most places in the world. Then there are many forms of social housing.

Rent to own is also a possibility but not seen in most countries.

Seems your problem is not ownership but landlords.

Some countries in Europe have the right to roam on any land. State owned and private owned. (Maybe more countries somewhere else have it to but I don't know)

It does not need to be so terrible. In some places it just is because of profits

[-] neatchee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Owning an apartment and owning land are wildly different. The housing structure alone is not the entirety of home ownership.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Since we're just talking hypotheticals anyway, let's say in the second image the land is actually owned by the owners of the apartments, like a co-op.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] neptune@dmv.social 20 points 1 year ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

what no right to roam does to a mfer

[-] firadin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Have you heard of a national or state park?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 18 points 1 year ago

Uh yes, the suburban tranquility of non-stop leaf blowing, lawn mowing, and pickup humming.

Musics to my ears.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I live in an apartment with actual good sound-proofing. It's almost dead silent inside except for the quiet hum of my AC. It's legitimately so much quieter than my gf's family's house, where you constantly hear the rush of cars driving by on the street. Not to mention leafblowers and lawnmowers.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

We should amend building codes to require sound insulation

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You realize you are speaking from a very lucky position right? Everyone here agrees quiet apartments with clean facilities are pretty nice, but a large majority of apartment dwellers live in older, very noisy, very poorly managed facilities.

It's very fair to want the conversation on improving apartments, it is super important. But you.have to acknowledge that people's response about their apartment history is informed from lived experience.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Kichae@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

suburban

Assumptions being made here.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rural neighbors. Even worse. Cowshit, ag runoff ruining our waterways, heavy machinery blocking streets, Trump flags inside every house and old boys racism everywhere the moment you're 'in' with them.

Instead of loud neighbors you have to deal with white trash family fights and drunk driving everywhere. Meanwhile everyone has a chip on their shoulder about city and suburban people ruining their world somehow yet they never participate in any of it lmfao.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

You're still too close if you can hear all that.

And I rather like the smell of cow shit

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, I doubt there is anyone here against rural self-sustained living, it is probably one of the more eco-friendly and humane way of living.

But once frequent car trip and road maintainance cames into equation, it might not be the most eco-friendly way any more. I understand not everyone cares about their fellow human being, but this is the point this post is trying to make.

[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

iirc, the further away you live from a city then the worse you impact the environment. Unless you're literally a fully self-sustaining homesteader with no roads or utilities anywhere near you, then living in a city is basically always better for the environment.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Turns out commuting by a gasoline-powered car on a sea of asphalt roads every day is bad for the planet. Who'd have thought?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Suburbs are the worst of both worlds. Gimme a cave on the top of the mountain miles from anywhere, thanks.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

All the fun of overbearing neighbors telling you what you can or can't do with all the inability to take the train anywhere

[-] Fredsshilksirt@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

don't forget the dudebros driving around blasting bass every 20min. I hope they all go deaf. peacocking morons.

[-] bustrpoindextr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yes, that doesn't happen in cities at all.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Cities are 100x worse for noise levels.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It'd take it over the sound of the upstairs neighbor fucking his microwave while bowling at the same time

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This isn't a particularly convincing analogy. Islands have limited space. The suburbs where I live border tons of open space and parks. Meanwhile, our school district is already overwhelmed with children, so converting commercial spaces into apartments will merely add to congestion and sprawl. NIMBY's make a convincing argument against denser residential construction.

A better focus would be the ability to simplify public transit and walkability. Town centers and public spaces could be more accessible with denser residential construction, and the additional green space can be closer to where you live without everyone needing their own half-acre yard to mow and water.

[-] rah@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

This isn't a particularly convincing analogy.

I think you replied in the wrong place? I didn't give an analogy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The suburbs where I live border tons of open space and parks.

Yeah but then they build more houses and destroy more of those open spaces to make room for more suburban sprawl

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1214 points (86.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

9662 readers
1235 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS