389
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
389 points (98.5% liked)
politics
18129 readers
3649 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Someone paid it. Not entirely convinced it was directly from Trump.
It was definitely not directly from Trump.
Let me save you some trouble:
Wouldn't be the first time Trump has paid good money for a chubb
Of course it's the Chubb group. Of course. It's funny they are supposedly a huge corp, but the only time I hear about them is when they're meddling and buying politicians
I would love to know about more instances about this.
I wonder what kind of insane terms are on that loan
Not that it would matter. Trump doesn’t honor agreements.
Exactly. So what kind of terms would it take for someone to loan nearly 100m to someone like that?
Well, not financially anyway. Maybe a promise for a future political favor if he wins? Not that I'd accuse a Swiss financial interest of working with fascists...
I think he probably put up a building or two as collateral, kind of like a HELOC. If it's not paid back, they repo the building(s).
I hope they got their own appraiser, because the Trump org is infamous for making up numbers. Better check the paperwork at city hall, too, to make sure there are no undisclosed mortgages, leans, or easements on the property.
An institution capable of making risky loans of substantial size certainly should have high quality risk and valuation assessment capabilities.
I imagine it's fairly standard boilerplate for the situation 'You must install corporate fascism and give me a job with medals and stuff if we manage to lie and cheat you into power again'
so some of us premium payers took the risk, and he could send us a personal letter like he did when "He" sent us Covid Relief Checks.
Trump's broke. That's why he put Lara trump as co chair and you hear that some ppl want the RNC to pay donnie's bills even though that would mean less money for down ballot candidates. Basically means about a billion needed and it would fuck the GOP in congress. I hope they go bankrupt.
Ivanka fell out of favor?
From the NY fraud case testimony and word on the street, she's distancing from daddy. She sees the writing on the wall. Plus, kushner got 2 billion for the Saudis so she don't need his money/ connections.
I think you misunderstood their statement: Trump wants Laura to help him fuck the RNC, whereas Ivanka he just wants to fuck.
The catch is that Trump's a prodigious fundraiser for the party. So not putting Lara on the co-chair spot could conceivably mean she runs of and does independent fundraising at the RNC's implicit expense.
I hate to say it, but Trump's coat-tails alone are probably worth a billion in GOP organizing and advertising. His base loves him and his name at the top of the ticket will get out far more votes in 2024 than the GOP received in 2022.
Thanks for this nightmare take.
This combined with the inability of the DNC to come up with any sort of unified messaging other than defeating Drumpf is terrifying.
For Putin, a small price to pay if it means solidifying his grasp on American politics.
Isn't he under financial monitoring due to the NY case? Am I mistaken?
An insurance company named Chubb put up the bond money and they are not under financial monitoring.
https://www.chubb.com/us-en/surety/transactional.html
Yeah so he must have signed over some collateral.
Putin is worth $200 billion. Easily enough to cover all of Donnie's expenses. Vlad wants Donnie in the White House, and will settle for complete chaos in the West. If the GOP collapses, there will plenty of Lorena Booboos running around at the state level. Think of what the real Lorena has done, then multiple by 100.
I mean, he's under serious financial scrutiny right now. Its not clear to me that this would even be possible.
Time to short Chubb.
Ooo getting a chub at the thought
That doesn't necessarily make it public. In the NY case I remember reading that if someone paid the $354m bond even that wouldn't necessarily be transparent as to who paid it.
Sure but there is a court appointed monitor. Like, some one knows who is empowered to raise a flag if its clearly shady?
Right?
right?
Not him personally, but his companies are.
My understanding is that the distinctions are a bit grey insofar as how they are managed, but sure.
Its not clear to me he has any real kind of money laying around at this point. Maybe he does.