1602

John Barnett had worked for Boeing for 32 years, until his retirement in 2017.

In the days before his death, he had been giving evidence in a whistleblower lawsuit against the company.

Boeing said it was saddened to hear of Mr Barnett's passing. The Charleston County coroner confirmed his death to the BBC on Monday.

It said the 62-year-old had died from a "self-inflicted" wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 4grams@awful.systems 483 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I am not a conspiracy theorist. Reality is trying it’s damnedest to make me one.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 218 points 5 months ago

Eh. There will always be real conspiracies and then...lizard people conspiracies.

This shit right here? yeah.....they killed him. 100%. No doubt in my fucking mind.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 171 points 5 months ago

I mean, he was old...people die—

It said the 62-year-old had died from a "self-inflicted" wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

oh shit they totally fucking killed him

[-] STOMPYI@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

THEY FUCKING KILLED HIM!

[-] xapr 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Relevant Chart (open image in new tab to see it larger):

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Not sure what to make of this chart except that a few items are misplaced imo and I agree conspiracy shit is an alt right pipeline in most cases. Maybe it wasn't always but whatever.

Anyhow.

I haven't followed up on the news. But there sure wasn't much available yesterday. So as far as actual reliable evidence we the public have little.

The guy being dead with an apparent self inflicted wound (as BBC and others said) or gunshot (as Corp Crime Reporter said) during whistleblower court proceedings against a giant company is consistent with suicide from:

  • Stress of the case or from blackmail
  • Stress from something totally unrelated.
  • Some other cause (depression, terminal illness...)

It is also consistent with:

  • murder made to look like suicide to silence his further testimony and dissuade others

Any of these is certainly plausible at least. As is Epstein being murdered. Actually, that one is more plausible, given the few suspicious coincidences and the sheer number of people who wanted his secrets to stay that way. Whereas extra-terrestrial UFOs aren't all that plausible based on our current body of scientific knowledge.

[-] xapr 3 points 5 months ago

I agree with pretty much everything you've written. The only point I would like to make is that the section where the UFOs sits is the "We Have Questions" section, which is between the "Things That Actually Happened" and "Unequivocally False But Mostly Harmless" sections. I interpret this section as containing things that cannot (as of 2021) be conclusively shown to be true or false. Also note that they're not even saying ET UFOs, but just UFOs. I think the flying saucer is just for visual flair. If I recall correctly, the person who designed this is/was an actual graphic designer.

[-] gila@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Lol, they mustn't be a great one, because their design seems to have led at least one of y'all to interpret the labels as denoting for the category below, rather than upper/lower bounds between two categories. i.e. things in the blue category above the "speculation line" label are speculative but not yet "leaving reality"

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Epstein didn't kill himself though. The circumstances where above the level of questioning, there were cameras turned off and he was supposedly on suicide watch.

[-] xapr 1 points 5 months ago

As I much as I also believe that, there is no hard evidence (that we know of) that he didn't kill himself. I think that's why it's in that section. The suspiciousness of it is through the roof, but we can't prove it.

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Sure we can't prove it but that diagram puts it at the same level of UFOs.

[-] xapr 1 points 5 months ago

Right, the chart is far from perfect, but they just grouped them both under the "we have questions" section. We have lots of unresolved questions about Epstein's death, we have lots of unresolved questions about UFO sightings.

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

No, I understand we have questions but explaining epstein requires a couple of details, while UFOs require new laws of physics.

[-] xapr 2 points 5 months ago

You definitely have a good point. I don’t think the designer probably meant much by it though. It’s only a casual classification.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

this is bulshit, epstein definetly didnt kill himself, for starters.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

How did they make hollow earth antisemitic? MF'rs

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 158 points 5 months ago

It's possible it was stress from the litigation. In fact, if you don't specify whose stress, I'd almost guarantee it.

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

There are circumstances where conspiracy the likeliest explanation.

This is one of those.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

If it actually happened, it's just a "conspiracy," not a "conspiracy theory."

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 32 points 5 months ago

He didn’t show any signs of depression or suicidal tendencies… signs like voluntarily flying on a boeing plane.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

It's no longer a conspiracy when it's proven true.

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

This isn't proof. That's the crazy part. I hear ya. I'm with ya. I don't see anything that is concrete physical evidence to tie it all together. As of now.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago

I agree, I just was making a joke. It's a conspiracy until you realize it's a fact. MK-ULTRA, Government spying on you (which time? ) , Big tobacco hiding that cigerettes cause cancer, Stacks of ET games are buried in New Mexico, even dark stories like the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments were all conspiracy theories at one time. Sadly they all turned out to be true.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago

There's also the conspiracy theory of conspiracy theories that the government actually likes and even spreads conspiracy theories so that the real ones get lost in the noise and written off by the general public as "just another loony conspiracy theory"

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 13 points 5 months ago

I like that one because I absolutely don't like it, but it's hard not to like and think that it's worth being a likable conspiracy theory.
And that's the problem with conspiracy theories, you like to like them and then you can't be sure.

It's just like that sometimes.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

Very few conspiracies are as dark and terrifying as (checks notes) Atari games buried in the desert.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago

A conspiracy is when a group plans to do something unlawful. So if it's proven true it's still a conspiracy. It just stops being a theory.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A "theory" is a collection of information we currently understand to be true.

The term "conspiracy theory" is a misnomer that should be correctly expressed as "conspiracy hypothesis". But that's just a theory.

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think the confusion arises from the secrecy part. A conspiracy is understood to be a secret unlawful activity, especially of subversive nature. When it's not secret anymore is it still conspiracy? or is it just organised crime? I know it feels just pedantic, but this is why the media abuses words to steer collective opinion. Nowadays you can just say something is a conspiracy and people will believe it's fake without recourse.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I was just being kind of funny. Language is weird and I'm pretty sure that the word conspiracy is headed through the change to mean "Crazy people think this thing is true"

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Then we need to find another word to express when people gets together to do shady shit, which happens more often than not.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

No arguments here. I'd like to be able to differentiate between people going shady shit and flat earth believers.

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That's the most annoying misunderstanding. A conspiracy is still a conspiracy when you prove it happened/it's happening. Conspirators remain conspirators, which means they were working together to do something illegal in secret. Ok, so now it's not secret anymore, but they still conspired.

[-] Kalysta@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

The Gulf of Tonkin incident being created by the US was a conspiracy theory until it wasn’t.

Not every “conspiracy theory” is wrong. Sometimes people in charge are actually trying to cover something up. It’s not insane to be skeptical of an official line until it’s backed up with proof.

Lizard people, however, don’t exist.

[-] 4grams@awful.systems 5 points 5 months ago

My comment was meant to be tongue in cheek but you pretty much nailed the message I’m after. Don’t jump to the conspiracy conclusion but you have to have something wrong with your brain if this doesn’t at least tickle your skeptic gland.

[-] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Lizard people, however, don’t exist.

Speak for yourself, upright ape.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 2 points 5 months ago

That's what they want you to think.

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
1602 points (99.2% liked)

News

22488 readers
4289 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS