952
submitted 11 months ago by _number8_@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

this country is so fucking cool

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 307 points 11 months ago

Cool. Let's see the legislature's browser histories.

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 144 points 11 months ago

My money says this guy can't even close his closet door anymore for all the skeletons.

[-] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 54 points 11 months ago
[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 69 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, loves talking about his creepy spy app he and his son have on their phone that alerts the other if they visit naughty sites. So the writers of this proposal and all that vote for it would be happy to put the same program on their devices and computers, right? And tie that straight to a public feed we can all see? Great Great.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 28 points 11 months ago

See when I read this story it isn't really that bad.

They believe porn is bad and use the app to keep each other accountable. I don't really have an issue with that. You do you.

But when they start trying to enforce that view through the government it's obviously not okay.

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago

Aside from it being creepy as hell to do that with your son (who probably didn't have a say in the matter) this is a massive national security risk. Spyware on a Congress member's phone? Not a great idea.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

It's creepy because it's his son, and he clearly is only doing it to control his kid.

You think the dad doesn't have a second device that's dedicated to wanking?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] StinkyOnions@lemmy.world 229 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry, I didn't know we lived under Sharia Law.

[-] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 120 points 11 months ago

It's hilarious and ironic that Christian nationalists hate sharia law whilst wanting their own brand enacted.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 113 points 11 months ago

They don't hate sharia law because it's abhorrent. They hate sharia law because it's not Christian based.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 91 points 11 months ago
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 115 points 11 months ago

Sex dick? Really Oklahoma? Are you guys OK?

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

They want to ban porn because it might tempt those who desperately want to be one of the straights.

But seriously, that congressman is so scared of being gay that they want everyone else to give up porn so they won't be challenged by easy dick.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] quirzle@kbin.social 46 points 11 months ago

Those poor, lonely Alaskans.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

I like that of all the states, Hawaii and Utah remain on-brand.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm in Wyoming. There's only ten of us here. The goth search was mine. The rest didn't bother with PornHub after I explained that "bear sex" wasn't going to give them the result they were expecting.

Idaho's "dildo ride" absolutely tracks. I have been wearing a Bad Dragon cap for weeks (it's an amazing hat) and it was a ~50 year old woman on the Idaho side of the mountain who recognized the logo.

EDIT: I am not joking. The caps are sick.

https://bad-dragon.com/products/caps

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 36 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Lmao.

Sex dick.

Also, damn Arkansas. You nasty.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (33 replies)
[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago

That guy watches so much porn

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 53 points 11 months ago

I don't want to engage in slander, but just extrapolating from previous conservative projection, that guy has a 15 year-old Honduran boy chained in his laundry room.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 67 points 11 months ago

Everyone involved in pushing this law should be barred from working in government, and fined for wasting our time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ryan213@lemmy.ca 67 points 11 months ago

Let's take bets on who's getting caught first! Drag queens or some god-fearing dude??

[-] Alto@kbin.social 45 points 11 months ago

Don't pretend for a second itll actually be enforced against the in group

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 65 points 11 months ago

I wish I didn't live in my COMMUNIST blue state where I can freely watch porn, read books, receive healthcare, feed hungry kids, breath clean air, turn around in driveways without getting shot and an abortion if I or my 10 year old daughter gets RAPED! I would MUCH rather live in a Red State where it's only legal to shoot homeless people, go to church and breath fumes from the coal plant next door unless it gets too cold and I freeze to death!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 59 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This guy is nuttier than squirrel shit. Total christofascist.

https://x.com/DustyDeevers/status/1734792445789884779?s=20

Besides banning porn, he wants to ban no-fault divorce, and ban abortion with no exceptions. He called COVID vaccines a"mark of the beast", called for the jailing of Fauci, and the virus was engineering by Bill Gates to decrease population.

[-] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

Please consider posting Nitter links, so it doesn't give Musk a single cent in advertising by using privacy focused Nitter: https://nitter.net/DustyDeevers/status/1734792445789884779

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MenacingPerson@lemm.ee 48 points 11 months ago

FREEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOM πŸ¦…πŸ¦…πŸ¦…πŸ¦…πŸ¦…πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ‡±πŸ‡·πŸ‡±πŸ‡·πŸ‡±πŸ‡·πŸ‡±πŸ‡·πŸ‡±πŸ‡·πŸ‡±πŸ‡·πŸ‡±πŸ‡·πŸ‡±πŸ‡·πŸŸπŸŸπŸŸπŸŸπŸŸπŸŸ

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago

Taking bets on how long it takes (not if, but when) this man is hacked and found to be absorbed in the exact thing he's trying to ban.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 42 points 11 months ago

What is wrong with Americans?

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

a brand of conservatism driven by religion

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago

This is like... Middle East religion police stuff.

[-] TK420@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago

Proof once again these delusional religious people need to fuck off.

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 36 points 11 months ago

So what do you think? How many of the politicians pushing for this are sexting with children?

[-] fsr1967@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

The Venn diagram is a circle

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

Land of the free, home of the American Taliban

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 33 points 11 months ago

The bill, set to be introduced next month by state Sen. Dusty Deevers (R-Elgin), would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that β€œlacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

Ok then, every piece of sexual content I produce or consume is in political protest of this specific bill. That should hold up in court. Bust one for Dusty!

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 33 points 11 months ago

I love watching our clueless citizens just allow this descent into fascism. Who knew it would be as simple as just not teaching kids what the word means.

[-] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

would prohibit consuming or producing sexual content that β€œlacks serious literary, artistic, educational, political, or scientific purposes or value” in any medium.

So you get get around it with a whiteboard in the background that has a math equation on it. Kinda like you can get around the swimsuit ban on twitch if you have an inflatable pool with water in it in the background.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

We really need a law where any politician who wants to vote to ban something has to first disclose their own relevant actions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 30 points 11 months ago

Both of those are constitutionally illegal.

[-] ExLisper@linux.community 42 points 11 months ago

Let's ask the Supreme Court what do they think.

...

They're on a private plane with a billionaire. Will get back to us later.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Does Oklahoma not have any real problems going on lol?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] books@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

God I lm glad I live in a blue state.

Backwardass motherfuckers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
952 points (98.1% liked)

News

23618 readers
3621 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS