136
submitted 5 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 121 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Seems weird to call it an "inert nuclear missile" when the entire payload component with the "nuclear" trait was not included.

For any TL;DR folks: it was just the rocket without the warhead. Basically an empty fuel tank with a nozzle.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 57 points 5 months ago

"empty bag of gold"

[-] comrade19@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Inert nuclear missile aimed at america

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

FBI SLAMS LOCAL HOMEGROWN TERRORIST FOR TRYING TO KILL 1000'S OF CHILDREN IN FIREY NUCLEAR BLAZE

The next headline

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[-] Zorque@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

While saluting a coffee cup.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

From Kenya... or, so I've heard, from a man who came up to me, he said, "sir," he said to me, tears streaming down his face, he said me, "sir..."

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 112 points 5 months ago

told BBC News on Friday that the device was "just basically a gas tank for rocket fuel". He called the event "not serious at all". "In fact, our bomb squad member asked me why we were releasing a news release on a rusted piece of metal," he said.

Saved you a click

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Peak journalism. Thats like a 50% made up story.

[-] Jode@midwest.social 49 points 5 months ago

I don't blame the museum for calling the bomb squad. The fuel they put in those things is some real nasty toxic shit that if there were any trace left would be problematic. The whole "nuclear" part is the media being intentionally clickbaity.

[-] brognak@lemm.ee 22 points 5 months ago

Love my scrap metal with a nice healthy layer of hydrazine.

[-] muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Isnt the whole point that the fuels self combust so exposing it to air should make it all decompose right?

[-] TheOtherThyme@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

This has to be one of the craziest weapons ever made. An unguided, nuclear, air-to-air rocket.

[-] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 5 months ago

For when you've got really bad aim

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Well tbf, you don't need great aim when you can vaporize everything within several hundred meters.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Sure, but no plane within about 2km is going to stay in the sky….

The em pulse, the shockwave, the heat….

Aim is for handguns, this thing might take yourself out if you’re not careful.

[-] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

The Davy Crockett Weapon System would like to have a word.

[-] Zellith@kbin.social 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 5 months ago

it is, but, like, artillery...

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Project Pluto has a few words as well. Well, mostly just the one word, but it screams it repeatedly.

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Continuously to be technical, since it's a ramjet.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I was referring to the extra nukes it drops along the way, but yeah the nuclear ramjet also causes devastation all the way along the flight path

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago

TBF you don't really need to have good aim when using a nuke.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I would guess that it was intended as an interceptor weapon. It wouldn't be used on one plane but a group Bears flying over the Arctic circle.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Tin foil hat engaged: This is exactly the news story I'd have the papers run if it'd had a warhead and too many people were aware of the missile's existence for convenient disappearances to be an option. Make it safe, spin a story to reassure the public, breathe a sigh of relief that it didn't turn out differently.

Then get back to guarding the secret prison facility holding the aliens who shot JFK.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

Surprising he still wants to donate it to the museum after they grassed him up.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What else is he gonna do with it? I doubt there's a ebay category for "nuclear warhead delivery systems". The best he might do is get someone to haul it away for scrap metal.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

North Korea may be interested in purchasing it

[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

In all seriousness, they have much more capable rockets.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Keep it, or donate it somewhere else.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

He might have a new preferred method of delivery though. Think of it as an express shipping option with an unmistakable delivery notification.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

“Oh… is that what that is?”

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

"We'll shoot fireballs at it!"

[-] Mvlad88@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Ex Children of Atom member?

[-] proctonaut@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Wait until they find his sub.

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
136 points (83.0% liked)

News

21821 readers
5295 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS