79

This is not me saying at all that Trump is better than Biden; it's more of an equalization argument that I truthfully can't see a fiscal difference.

It's been well known by people like us that the two bourgeois parties are basically the same, but I never really understood how close they were until the last like, 6 months.

Maybe it's JUST Biden that's super similar. But regardless, I just don't see the difference. He spews nice words about trans rights, workers, all of these good things. But the exact same shit that happened under Trump basically happened under Biden. Funding for genocidal states, proxy war funding, funding police, loss of abortion federal protection, separation of kids and parents at the border, etc.

People keep saying Biden is marginally better, where?

I don't know. I can't bring myself to vote for any of these guys this time around.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 53 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The irony is that the Americans are slaves to their electoral system. Liberal democracies are one big, pathetic myth where they make the masses believe that they are the ones in control of the polity and just like they elected someone into a position of power they can dismiss them in later elections.

The discourse that has been happening shows quite a different reality: Americans are treating the elections as if there is no alternative. Even if there indeed was no alternative, they don't bargain with the ones in power, they don't use their vote as a bargaining chip for political change. They are ready to vote unconditionally because they accept their candidate as is.

You don't see democrat voters pressuring the Biden administration to put an end to the genocide in Palestine. They feel uneasy towards what's happening but ultimately they consider themselves to be powerless. Western democracy and constitutionalism have politically alienated the people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kaplya@hexbear.net 44 points 6 months ago

You are not giving Biden enough credit.

Take a look at this:

From 2016-2019, white family wealth had stagnated under Trump. From 2019-2022, white family wealth exploded upwards while black and Hispanic family wealth had remained in stagnation, and that’s just the first 2 years of Biden administration.

In fact, black families found themselves getting poorer under Biden, while the opposite is true for white families:

Source: Federal Reserve

Under Trump, everyone suffered. But under Biden, rich white people are experiencing some of the fastest growth in their wealth in a long time, while screwing the other minorities along the way. That’s the difference between Trump and Biden.

[-] jackmarxist@hexbear.net 25 points 6 months ago

Trump somehow coming out as the better president just because of how much of an incompetent clown he is.

[-] Jennie@lemmygrad.ml 43 points 6 months ago

Racist geriatric maniac who bombs the middle east vs racist geriatric maniac who bombs the middle east. Neither is better or worse than the other at this point

[-] SadArtemis@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 6 months ago

At least one of the two sought to leave Syria (though they still also bombed it, because of course they did). Though when it comes to the MENA region I think I agree, both are as vile and deranged as it gets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ledlecreeper27@lemmygrad.ml 37 points 6 months ago

PSL is running Claudia De la Cruz and Karina Garcia. I doubt they'll win but their campaign might raise class consciousness.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 36 points 6 months ago

What baffles me is that democRATs cannot produce any viable candidate apart from Biden. Do they have no idea how bad it looks? Even disregarding that Biden is a racist genocidal piece of shit (something that democrats do not care about), he is degenerating neurologically by the day. Looking at him I cannot confidently say that one year from now he will be able to walk and talk at all.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I find this very peculiar. They are in the "vote blue no matter what" mode even if "what" is open genocide, so they should also with no problem vote blue no matter who, and their entire campain for Biden have exactly one point "he is not Trump" anyway.

So why that carcass, they could as well put up random John Doe, Florida Man or a cat and "not Trump" would still work.

[-] CommunistCuddlefish@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago

This is the problem with listening to their rhetoric rather thsn looking st their acrions. Their rhetoric is a smokescreen; their actions reveal their true values.

"Vote blue no matter who" is a rationalization. You are correct that if they wanted to win no matter what, they'd pick a better candidate than one who is explicitly pro-genocide, has dementia, and has fucked the working class over for his entire career. They'd go with a Bernie style populist and run on his wildly popular platform.

Western white liberals are at their core extremely racist. They fear and hate bipoc people, Middle Easterners, and especially Muslims. So Biden's genocide in Palestine is actually a positive for them -- but many* have enough self awareness to know they can't openly cheer for it without revealing how depraved they are. They don't just want to beat Trump, they want to do so while maintaining the fascist, imperialist, capitalist project. Biden is their guy

  • Thomas L Friedman who recently got an op-ed published in the New York Times likening Middle Easterners to wasps and calling for the entire region to be set on fire, is a notable exception
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As far as electoralism is concerned, I have fully embraced the grill pill.

[-] Hestia@hexbear.net 24 points 6 months ago

I just want to grill

up some pork

[-] barrbaric@hexbear.net 18 points 6 months ago
[-] lil_tank@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 6 months ago

Biden has better aesthetics. No anti-intellectualism, focus on respectability, posturing as progressive etc... in a world where I would buy into US propaganda I'd be inspired by the image that the Dems want to give and I'd be scared and revolted by the image that the Reps have.

But that's all just aesthetics. Libs who urge you to vote Biden are just not seeing beyond PR

[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 33 points 6 months ago

Him proposing to end asylum for migrants is objectively worse than anything Trump did on the border.

He keeps saying there are no conditions on support for Isreal. No lib has been able to explain to me what is way worse than "unlimited unconditional funding"

We are currently drilling more oil than any nation in history anywhere ever.

It's literally just lip service and then when a reporter literally asks "are you planning on doing anything other than having conversations" the press secretary gets pissed

[-] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 6 months ago

No lib has been able to explain to me what is way worse than “unlimited unconditional funding”

Direct involvement perhaps?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 6 months ago

There's no meaningful difference between republicans and democracts because both parties represent the interests of class that holds power in the end. And this isn't just us Marxists saying this, here's what a Princeton study analyzing many decades of US policy concluded:

What do our findings say about democracy in America? They certainly constitute troubling news for advocates of “populistic” democracy, who want governments to respond primarily or exclusively to the policy preferences of their citizens. In the United States, our findings indicate, the majority does not rule—at least not in the causal sense of actually determining policy outcomes. When a majority of citizens disagrees with economic elites or with organized interests, they generally lose. Moreover, because of the strong status quo bias built into the U.S. political system, even when fairly large majorities of Americans favor policy change, they generally do not get it.

US elections are just a circus with the sole aim of making people feel like they're participating in the political process. Republicans are a brand curated to appeal to social conservative people and Democrats are a brand for socially liberal ones. The goal is to get people to get invested in issues that don't threaten capital and to fight over them. As Parenti so aptly puts it in Blackshirts and Reds:

Seizing upon anything but class, leftists today have developed an array of identity groups centering around ethnic, gender, cultural, and life-style issues. These groups treat their respective grievances as something apart from class struggle, and have almost nothing to say about the increasingly harsh politico-economic class injustices perpe­trated against us all. Identity groups tend to emphasize their distinc­tiveness and their separateness from each other, thus fractionalizing the protest movement. To be sure, they have important contributions to make around issues that are particularly salient to them, issues often overlooked by others. But they also should not downplay their common interests, nor overlook the common class enemy they face. The forces that impose class injustice and economic exploitation are the same ones that propagate racism, sexism, militarism, ecological devastation, homophobia, xenophobia, and the like.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 6 months ago

I'm not USAyan, but Trump withdrawn troops and said he'd get USA out of NATO. If he delivered, he'd be the most significant political figure for a fight against neocolonialism. I don't exactly know the life within US for US people, but Trump is a significantly good choice for world politics from my perspective. Biden increased poverty death rate in Europe by approving destroying the gas line (I assume he partook based on his public statements) and general poverty suffering. He continues supporting the apartheid and genocide of Palestinians. I find people who wish to vote for him extremely evil, but if your life under Trump was indeed this bad then I can somewhat understand why you don't care about the blight your politicians bring to the rest of the world.

[-] relay@lemmygrad.ml 30 points 6 months ago

IF he delivered on getting the USA out of NATO

IF he didn't bomb Syria and get the approval of the Democrats. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-announces-strikes-syria-following-suspected-chemical-weapons-attack-assad-n865966

IF he didn't "solve" the conflict in occupied Palatine by not inviting Palestinian representatives. https://www.startpage.com/sp/search?query=trump+israel+deal&cat=web&pl=opensearch

Trump also brought sanctions back to Cuba and Iran after Obama removed them.

Both Democrats and Republicans are terrible. If one votes it is for the lesser evil. There is no choice that doesn't kill innocent civilians around the world. There is no choice to end the various sanctions. Any good done by one president can be undone by another.

Voting is not a method towards justice, only a compromise.

[-] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 6 months ago

Thank you for the information. I am reverting to my natural stance:

death to the US of AmeriKKKa*

  • US =/= America, Latin Americans and natives are mighty fine, may they get free of the oppressor
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 6 months ago

Trumps “anti-war” position was all a facade. He wanted to lower tensions with Russia as a fellow “white” socially reactionary state and instead focus on Venezuela, Iran and China. Plus he was just a wild card opportunist. One day he was pretending to be besties with the DPRK, the next people are worried he’ll start a nuclear war with them. Even with Russia he flip-flopped. At one point he talked about wanting to get “the ruskies” out of Venezuela.

The difference in foreign policy is chaotic evil vs “lawful” evil. Trump does whatever the hell and has different priorities. Biden tries to appear respectable as he escalates with everyone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 6 months ago

If Trump actually tries to follow through with pulling the US out of NATO, he'll get merked by the deep state in no time.

[-] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 6 months ago

I still wish he'd manage to pull it off still. 😔

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 32 points 6 months ago

I will actually be voting for Biden.

His dementia is so far advanced the next 4 years are going to be really funny.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago

Sorry, I just can't bring myself to do it.

That's why I'm voting for Hillary Clinton

[-] Yoholungfish@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 6 months ago

like Reagan funny? Ole Ronny was pretty far advanced - capitalist evil loves an empty suit, the emptyier the better

[-] D61@hexbear.net 28 points 6 months ago

Politics at the national level in the USA is pretty much just aesthetics.

Local politics might be a bit better but the higher up you go the only real differences seem to be how soon the candidate's masks slip.

[-] darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 6 months ago

I hope Trump wins if only because I want to see the liberals suffering and seething. It's hardly adequate karma for the genocide of the Palestinian people but it'll be something and maybe just maybe to someone somewhere it will send the message that supporting an open genocide even in the genocidal settler west is a bit too far. It also wrenches the system back and forth which is good. Forces all those Europeans who've been sobbing about NATO and democracy and liberal values and how evil Putler is to either embrace Trump and look like even worse hypocrites or to distance themselves. It won't be enough to destroy NATO naturally but any tension that can be added is good. Trump doesn't wear the mask of respectability Biden does to the world and that's something too which makes me feel it's slightly more positive if he's president in the long game-plan. Liberals won't be in the streets under 4 more years of Biden, they might be under Trump.

Of course nothing much will change either way. There is no lesser evil, only funny evil pedophile war criminal and not funny evil pedophile war criminal who is hidden by his staff and who make all the decisions for him and give him a veneer of respectability. If you're a Marxist you shouldn't vote for either of them. Vote for a communist on your ballot or do a write-in or don't vote at all for a presidential candidate. Amazingly you can just go and vote on local and state ballot initiatives while not putting anything down on the presidential race.

[-] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 6 months ago

to either embrace Trump and look like even worse hypocrites or to distance themselves

Or they could do what they did the last time trump was in office - pretend to distance themselves, while running backroom deals and agreements, further colonising Europe to US capital

[-] darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 6 months ago

Well that was happening anyways. The Ukraine situation has assured Europe's hollowing out and subjugation to the US and they did that all to themselves willingly in the open while proclaiming loudly it had to be done for democracy and liberalism and all that. I frankly don't see that trend reversing no matter who is president, just that they might have to seem estranged for a while it might encourage a few more politicians on the edges to grow a stronger backbone as Hungry has demonstrated.

[-] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 6 months ago

The only thing I can say is that the republican party might have a slightly harder time at pushing Project 2025 if Biden gets reelected. But the agendas and policies will be the same, and republicans will still control most local governments. And the fact that democrats are roughly equal to republicans in their evilness.

[-] TeezyZeezy@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 6 months ago

I didn't even consider that most localities are controlled by Republicans. That's wild

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 months ago

Trump might Mr Magoo his way into better policy by a combination of ignorance, incompetence, and contrarian willfulness. Biden will die in office after nuking Gaza because he has a dementia episode and thinks Hamas killed his son.

[-] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 22 points 6 months ago

The Trump admin was so incompetent that I think they had a net positive on foreign policy by bungling so many things. Lots of Latin American countries seemed to make progress that would normally have been suppressed by American influence in one form or another. I feel like Hillary wouldn't have let the whole Juan Guaido thing get so embarrassing.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 6 months ago

Trump started low burn trade conflict with EU over several things. Biden turned it around to complete vassalisation of EU.

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 23 points 6 months ago

Biden wants to destroy Russia before going to war with China

Trump only wants to improve relations with Russia in order to go to war with China now

Both seem to be interested in going to war with Iran in the next 5 years.

[-] QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 6 months ago

Whenever the party switches everything gets worse. Trump to Biden or Biden to Trump. Either will continue to support genocide and so on. Whoever wins nothing good will happen,

[-] Hexbear2@hexbear.net 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There has been no difference since Carter. Carter was the one who started modern neoliberalism with the idea that inducing a recession would be a good thing to stop run-away inflation, so he worked with the fed to start one.

It went Carter, Reagan, CIA, Clinton. (or, in other words, CIA, CIA, CIA, CIA).

By then, we were cooked, truly no difference in neoliberalism from either party, the cruelty towards the average person domestic and abroad is some sort of special evil.

Edit, in 1963, the CIA was successful in a coupe of the USA, and has been in charge ever since.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 6 months ago

They're both dumbasses and sides of the same coin. The difference is who they consider the biggest threat, Democrats think its Russia while Republicans think its China.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShiningWing@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Someone I follow(ed) on Mastodon was just trying to shame people who don't vote, because of the idea that "Trump is going to immediately round up all us trans people and throw us in camps if you don't vote Biden!!"

As far as I can tell, the claim seems entirely made up, and it feels almost malicious to be basing that entire decision around the idea that "Trump MIGHT come after ME hypothetically!!" rather than all of the people Biden has already thrown in camps and all of the people in Gaza that Biden has given his unconditional support to genociding

It feels downright selfish to still be pushing that "vote blue no matter who" bullshit for that reason, and they clearly haven't learned shit from 2016 and 2020

They're also still under the impression that people choose not to vote just so that they can "push the Democrats more progressive", when it's basically the opposite, people realize they can't push the Democrats left so they're choosing not to participate in the sham they call a "democracy", but I guess this is one of those people who can only see politics within the confines of the US electoral system

Edit: Not to mention all the other shit people have mentioned as having been actively worse under Biden, it makes it feels especially garbage and selfish that one is still pushing the idea of Biden being a human rights savior

[-] Hexbear2@hexbear.net 18 points 6 months ago

It's not true. Trump was President for 4 years, that didn't happen. It's histrionics.

[-] ShiningWing@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Exactly, people still have this cartoonish idea of what a Trump presidency would be like as if we didn't have 4 years of seeing exactly what it would be like

People are like "but maybe he'll be worse this time!", and like that could be true, but that's an entirely different thing than making very specific assumptions about specific actions he's supposedly going to take based on no actual evidence, it's just fearmongering to try to coerce people into reelecting a president who has already been actively materially worse (it's as if everyone's forgotten how much trans rights in the US have already been backsliding under Biden's watch)

[-] HakFoo 17 points 6 months ago

It tend to agree. The closest thing to a tangible delivered-policy difference is the flavour of grandstanding on social issues. Biden might be publically less hostile to certain ethnic groups and the LGBTQ+ community, and more willing to leverage abortion access as a policy. However, I feel like we're in a very "you let it break in the first place" scenario.

These issues should have been solved and locked down decades ago. Of course, we never solved the underlying social and economic tensions, so the public is hungry for scapegoats and targets. We can't blame Blacks anymore (in public) but "Illegal Immigrants" and transgender boogeymen in the ladies' room are an excellent distraction from the rich draining our planet dry.

Both parties dropped the ball there. The GOP used social issues as a wedge, but the Democrats relied on a lot of gossamer-thin legal precedent and social norms to keep everything gkued together- where was the explicit access-to-abortion law, or even constitutional amendment push?

[-] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 6 months ago

It was under the Biden regime that my home state stopped allowing me to update my birth certificate. He has clearly and obviously not done enough to protect us.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PoliticalCustard@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As someone who thankfully doesn't have the awful electoral choice that Americans do (I'm in the UK so although the choice is dire, it's not frighteningly dire), the question I usually ask myself is "Which presidential candidate will result in the fewest deaths?" and, in this case, that seems to me to be impossible to answer.

That said, in terms of "fitness" for office, Biden is literally a candidate who is unfit for office. Just this week he mixed up the border between Gaza and Egypt and spoke of it as "the Mexican border". And he also mixed up Macron with Mitterrand... it's really frightening. What's he going to be like in one year, let alone two or three?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
79 points (81.6% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2102 readers
91 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS