582
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/til@lemmy.world

Then, responding to those who have said he’s “only doing this for the money", Szymanski tweeted: “Yes, no fucking shit. I make games for a living. If I didn't want to earn money from them I wouldn't charge money for them.”

The game follows the premise of being trapped in an underwater submarine out of necessity to capture deep pictures.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] superfes@lemmy.world 184 points 3 months ago

People will literally complain about everything, no sense in trying to appease everyone all the time.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago

No matter what it is you do or how well you do it, even if you do it for free, a specific subset of motherfuckers will still act like you owe them something.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 35 points 3 months ago

Especially when you do it for free. I write a lot of open source and sometimes the comments are real "nice".

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

That’s awesome of you and I hope, while those people are unlikely to disappear from your life, your memories of ungrateful feedback last no longer than they would for a salamander.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

I wish cities and elected officials would have the same mindset. Instead the best action for some reason has become inaction.

Best to do nothing, then have one group or another hate you?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 149 points 3 months ago

Lmao..

AAA dogshit shovelware game increases price from $60 to $70 and some people are unhappy.

Small time indie dev bumps game price from $6 to $8 to keep up with inflation and people lose their shit to the point it goes on gaming msm

No wonder we’re the most abused market.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

Well, one is a 17% and one a 33% price hike, so outrage is totally understandable! I'm not being serious, btw.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

This is an excellent example of how you can use statistics/percentages to push a false narrative.

Cause you hear "Dev increased game 33%" and you wonder what the fuck is going on, and in that same vein a 17% price hike doesnt sound nearly as outrageous. Despite the fact that 33% is a paltry 2 dollars, that came with a massive increase in content, and the measly 17% is a massive increase in price for a game that is fundamentally worse than what was made 10 years ago in scope and content.

and to be clear, I am not saying RecluseRamble is in any way pushing any kind of negative/false narrative. I'm just using his % without context (within the vein of his own post) to show how things can be manipulated.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kryllic@programming.dev 139 points 3 months ago

"I like the business model of ‘I want money so I make something that I think is worth money, and you pay me that money and you get the thing, and we're all happy’,” Szymanski continued. “That's it. There's nothing complicated or hidden here.

Lmao I love it, gonna get this game now

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Also check out Dusk. It's a full length game as opposed to a one and done streamer game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 111 points 3 months ago

No mate, I'm doing you a favour playing your game. You should pay me. It would be great exposure. I've got literally some followers.

And yeah, I'll bang on about minimum wage being too low and I'll post about AAA Devs ripping off their workers, but a lone developer asking $10 for something that probably took them months, too much. Too much.

What a sell out.

(/S just in case)

[-] adam_y@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

And what's worse, half of those complaining bought Elon's blue tick!

[-] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 25 points 3 months ago

Gamers: Where's my game? Why do you subject your developers to crunch? Why is it so expensive? Why don't you pay your developers more?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 93 points 3 months ago

Meh, it's two dollars and the dev is an indie, at least it doesn't go towards filling the pockets of a large publisher.

[-] _Sprite@lemmy.world 78 points 3 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer 71 points 3 months ago

"You're only doing it for the money" to a game dev is the same as being asked in a job interview to show all the git repos you worked on in your spare time.

People develop skills, and they often choose to use those skills to make money. We expect game devs to only break even now? F off with that shit.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 68 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The people complaining about a $2 price increase are the same guys harassing women on Instagram for free OF subs.

[-] whereisk@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I hope this is clever marketing from the developer because I had never heard of this game until now and also because I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone would abuse an indie developer for $2.

I understand some people might do that, but they'd have to be a tiny percentage.

[-] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 44 points 2 months ago

People bully FOSS developers when their creations are free so I can't say I'm surprised.

I hope this is clever marketing from the developer because I had never heard of this game until now

The same person made DUSK and Squirrel Stapler. Squirrel Stapler and Iron Lung are shorter games that have been popular with streamers.

[-] Kage520@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I once made an app for Samsung watches for disc golf scorekeeping. It could accept any number of players, apply a handicap throughout the game so you could know exactly how you were doing vs your opponent with different handicaps on every hole, and gave a nice scorecard at the end to view. It was $0.99

Someone complained that I made them "throw away their money down the drain" since it didn't also have gps to tell them how far they were from the hole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 46 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Did they face significant backlash? Or is IGN just trying to "make fetch happen"? I might have just missed it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

Fuck you all, im going to go buy it out of spite

[-] eskimofry@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Buying the game now

[-] runeko@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Drewelite@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 3 months ago

Consumers these days have so much entitlement. I understand not wanting to be tricked with advertising or wanting a safe product, without toxic chemicals or whatnot.

But at the end of the day, assuming that's the case, someone should be able to make whatever they want and charge whatever they want. If no one buys it, they're a bad business person. The end. But lately I've seen so many people doing things like starting witch hunts to go after makers of something they don't like. Or trying to strongarm a company into changing a product by holding their reputation for ransom. Or deciding as a community on an idealized business model and punishing companies that don't use it.

And the gaming community is the worst of them. Like if you don't like multiplayer games, fine. Don't shit on a game for like 5 paragraphs just to finally say, "See? RDR2 did just fine, we should be making single player games. Anyway I didn't actually play this and neither should you. 0/5 stars."

Like bro, this team worked really hard to make a game they believed in. They didn't have to run it by you. If you don't like it play something else. But people will claim you have no right to have created what you did, the audacity that you thought you could is appalling, and frankly... You're an immoral person to work for money. Like damn guys, chill. Nobody has to make you games. I don't go see Starry Night and write a letter to Van Gogh's estate like, "I'm not a fan of blue"

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 11 points 3 months ago

I picked this one up a few days ago, very cool game concept and well executed

[-] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Isn't only like an hour and a half or something?

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 38 points 2 months ago

The price change was accompanied by an update that included

the addition of the Terminal, which, located in the back of the Iron Lung, opposite to the photograph display monitor, could be used to look up certain terms relevant to the game's lore. Aside from the addition of the terminal, the update also included the addition of the SM-8[(a new location to explore)], Steam achievements, trading cards, and a point shop. The update also fixed collision issues with the Humming Monolith, as well as moved it to a different location.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
582 points (96.8% liked)

Today I Learned

16347 readers
388 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS