197
submitted 7 months ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/games@sh.itjust.works
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 191 points 7 months ago

Think most people are more interested in what Larian is cooking up, the IP barely matters.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 60 points 7 months ago

Yeah anyone apart from Larian making BG4 is basically fucked. Maybe if they wait 5-10 years and a studio with an established brand comes in, but that isn't what's going to happen.

Prior to BG3 I held BG1&2 somewhere in the top 5 games of all time. BG3 had an impossible bar to meet and they not only met it, but far surpassed it.

I'm genuinely sad at whatever BG4 releases as. It's like someone who loved Diablo 1&2 looking at Diablo 3&4. Diablo 3 was a shell of Diablo 2 and I literally just had to check if Diablo 4 was a released game. Maybe it's fun to someone, but I've completely checked out of the series.

So here's to BG4, BG:TCG, & BG:Mobile, shells of the greatness that came before them.

[-] Ilflish@lemm.ee 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

~~Oblivion~~ Obsidian is the only other company that can hold expectations currently

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 46 points 7 months ago

Exactly. This headline read as "Interested investors want to throw money at someone because BG3 did so well and then demand they release a half finished product so they can meet their quarterly financial date."

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

I think people are sort of over wotc ever since the OGL fiasco, plus milking mtg for all it's worth. This is probably a result.

[-] Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago

You'd be surprised how many people don't know about that or think everything is fine now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

That's not how IP holders think. Their ego ruins our fun.

[-] MrBusiness@lemmy.zip 11 points 7 months ago

I think Paizo would be a good collab. Personally I'd love to see Larian do something with Starfinder.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 164 points 7 months ago

Idk if anyone could do half the job Larian did.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 111 points 7 months ago

I have a feeling this will just be a cash grab to milk the IP for as much as they can.

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago

Imagine if bg4 is a mobile game with micro transactions? Hasbro would totally do it

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 29 points 7 months ago

Don't you guys have phones‽

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

Is that the corpse of blizzard being piloted by Activision I hear??

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Obsidian could maybe, they did a couple classic BG-style Infinity Engine games in Pillars of Eternity I & II.

...but that's a little bit like a step back/down from what we saw in BG3.

[-] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

One huge advantage Larian had was years of experience making games in this genre, and I doubt many other studios have that sort of corporate knowledge. Obsidian may be the only sizable one that comes close. Maybe Beamdog too, as they are responsible for the Enhanced Editions of all the old Infinity Engine games, including some original content.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tomkatt@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

I have full faith in Tactical Adventures. Solasta is the closest translation of tabletop D&D to CRPG ever made IMO. All they need is a better than indie budget and permissions to use the full license and content instead of just the SRD.

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 10 points 7 months ago

The gameplay is good but from what I played, outside of combat, it was a bit lackluster, and rations were a pain when I played. Though it's hard not to compare it to BG3 in that regard. I did like Larian's system to interact with the environment and liquids too that made some battles more dynamic. Maybe there's more of that is Solasta than I saw too, I didn't get far, should give it another go, it has solid combat which is at least half of a good DnD game.

load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 88 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
  1. Old series that has a decent following of mostly niche dedicated fans is left to sit without a new installment for many years.

  2. New title is announced. It's sells gang-busters and flips the community on its head.

  3. Corporate Executives prioritize short term profits and begin planning a quick and easy cash grab. !

  4. Second new installment comes out. It is a shell of the previous title with the soul sucked clean out.

  5. Fans are dissapointed and outside of a small niche following the game series falls into obscurity.

  6. Repeat.

! we are here right now

Look.. Maybe BG4 will be good. But after watching this exact cycle play out over and over again for the past decade I'm not sure how you can expect anything else.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

When will the business world realize that anything business majors are given control of turns to shit. Like I know that it's not impossible for a AAA game to be good but I also know that most companies that can handle that kind of a budget are run by people who just think gamers love throwing money at anything labeled "video game", proved by so many out of touch quotes.

Like the BlizzCon "don't you have phones?" showed that Blizzard didn't even realize that their main demographic and shitty f2p phone games didn't have much overlap.

Or EA's "sense of satisfaction" was transparent when they give a paid path to skip a ridiculously tuned grind.

Or Ubisoft's "AAAA" said they hadn't even noticed that "AAA" was starting to be considered synonymous with "shit".

The funny part is that they aren't even wrong about the potential to make a lot of money from video games, it's just not by using business major tricks to extract the maximum short term gains or approaching making a video game by thinking about how to make the most money from it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] betz24@lemmynsfw.com 41 points 7 months ago

BG4 is going to be BGOnline 😂

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but it's a straight terrible port from a mobile game with a solid gacha foundation and Baldur's Gate skins tacked on. Also you need to subscribe and pay a weekly fee to get access to the premium lockboxes that may or may not (spoiler: they do not) give you the characters/skins/whatever that you actually came for. Everything is time-gated unless you pay more of the premium currency to be allowed to grind more for a chance that won't proc anyway unless you go into debt to buy enough crates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Let's see ~~Paul Allen's~~ Owl Cat's ~~card~~ Baldur's Gate.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

WotC like FEED ME A STRAY DEV

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shani66@ani.social 6 points 7 months ago

Please no, i want owlcat to work on good things. Things very, very far removed from dnd.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Conyak@lemmy.tf 22 points 7 months ago

I’m good. Not really interested in supporting Hasbro after all that’s happened since BG3 released.

[-] necromancyr@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

So...a new Dark Alliance game is up next?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Okay. I mean that's fine but I won't be buying shit until after it comes out and has reviews.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

BG2 was a huge game too, and it took 25 years for a sequel.

They're not going to pick a studio and crank out bg4 in just a couple years.

I'll be surprised if it takes less than a decade.

[-] reversebananimals@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago

WOTC can put the name "Baldurs Gate 4" on whatever they want. They could make a Farmville clone in 2 months and release it as "Baldurs Gate 4" if they want. They own the copyright.

It just won't be good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] li10@feddit.uk 36 points 7 months ago

Isn’t Wizards of the Coast scummy af?

Larian are the studio with integrity, why wouldn’t Wizards of the Coast go for the cash grab?

[-] bizzle@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

100% BG4 will be a cash grab

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The problem is that Hasbro is desperately trying to make more money from WotC. But fairly recent actions indicate that they don't have players' best interests at heart. They fired all the contacts that Larian worked with. So nobody is left who has even a modicum of insight into how BG3 was done so well.

I fear several cheap cash grabs are in store for us. The first will probably be a quick and dirty DLC that will come out in a year or two.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Yeah, cranking out another entry to capitalize on BG3's success would be a terrible move. I'm so glad Hasbro/WotC are not known for making terrible moves. That would be so unlike them to trade in goodwill for short-term profits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] misk@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It took less than 2 years to release BG2 after BG1. In the meantime Bioware licensed Infinity Engine to Black Isle who released Planescape Torment and Icewind Dale one year apart.

It took Larian 6 years to develop BG3 after Divinity 2. They moved on to their new game but that engine and assets could be similarily licensed to other studios to churn out some games using similar or simplified formula.

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I believe the engine is larian's

[-] nman90@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Definitely is. Try playing Divinity 2 and you will realize it's the exact same engine just with a modified ruleset to match Baldurs gate more. I actually prefer Divinity, they just have more freedom as far as setting and the ruleset than a liscensed ip owned by another company

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

RIP Baldur's Gate, at least you had one final hurrah with 3

[-] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

It's gonna be blizzard isn't it...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
197 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16834 readers
1023 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS