1157
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 142 points 2 months ago

I guess I'm not surprised that programmers don't know how to follow meme standards.

The three panels following the first one are supposed to be helping the first one.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 187 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I am altering the meme. Pray I do not alter it any further.

[-] Buttons@programming.dev 44 points 2 months ago

Senior developer here, it looks like they are helping to me.

[-] Midnight1938@reddthat.com 13 points 2 months ago

Sending you on a side quest isnt really helping efficiently

[-] entropicdrift 3 points 2 months ago

But it is helping effectively.

It's less efficient to learn how to do something than to have somebody who knows how do it for you, but it's more effective to learn for yourself. Hard won knowledge is rarely lost.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 2 months ago

Yeah but it's funny in a different way; they are giving ignorant and condescending advice because while big cats have impressive hunting abilities, they don't normally hunt mice.

[-] Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 months ago

The person you're responding to is giving advice in an ignorant and condescending way as a joke

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Someone else already did. Marked as duplicate.

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 2 months ago

Part of language (which memes are a part of) is changing it to express new ideas and new forms of humor.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Is anyone going to tell them about stack overflow, or...

[-] olutukko@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

how dare people alter the meaning of a meme? there are meme standards for a reason!! /s

[-] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago

We live in a society. We have laws. And order.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 117 points 2 months ago

“Insufficient detail. Please ask a specific question.”

“Read the wiki”

“Nobody here is interested in holding your hand.”

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 49 points 2 months ago

“Insufficient detail. Please ask a specific question.”

This is a very real problem from the answering side. So many people would rather have you guess what they're trying to ask and then get mad at you when you guess wrong.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 20 points 2 months ago

I know whenever I try to help someone with a Linux issue it's always an uphill battle to get them to stop guessing what they think the problem might be and show me the logs.

People really don't want to give you the information you need to help them.

[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

To be fair, people who know which logs to attach and how to get them usually already know enough to troubleshoot the issue by themselves.

[-] png@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 months ago

This is such a hard part of learning Linux. "Just look at the logs" Which logs? Where? How?

[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

journalctl > logs.txt (don't actually do this)

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago

You'd think so, but the logs often contain a ton of noise along with the one line that tells me what the actual issue is.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago

I make sure to give my guess and also append as many logs and exact information as possible, right down to every step I took that produced the problem.

So far my success rate with the forums is 0%. But hey, people at least tried to be helpful!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 17 points 2 months ago

Stop, stop. It hurts, it's too real.

[-] alyth@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 76 points 2 months ago

“Relying on humans” is open to interpretation.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 12 points 2 months ago

For food. You know... nom nom (the humans as food I am hinting at!:-P).

[-] candyman337@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I once submitted an issue to a devs GitHub. The apps login page would not load without large bg pictures loading first. I asked if he could add an option to disable it in the settings, as my self hosted site was slow.

I essentially got back, "why would I do that? It's not an issue for me! Besides the login page should load before the background picture" issue closed

😑😑😑😑

It's like you're SO CLOSE to seeing the issue.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This image macro is supposed to be supportive

[-] revisable677@feddit.de 56 points 2 months ago

So was stackoverflow when it began

[-] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago

I'd rather rather run my nuts through a wringer than deal with that shit.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Hey u/wringer4u

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago
[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Can confirm, the support forum crowd are dicks

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 28 points 2 months ago

It's an X Y problem. Please retell the history, starting from your birth, that led to this moment before I contemplate answering your question

Signed, somebody who would rather waste your time than answer the bloody question.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago

My for-profit large language model will not be stopped by your "anti commercial ai license" because it hasn't learned to read yet.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 months ago

Ive seen people link that one multiple times and i am at a loss what its about.

The cc 4.0 license it points to does not mention AI at all.

CC even has a page where they state that it probably is legal to train on cc protected content but it depends on context.

https://creativecommons.org/2023/08/18/understanding-cc-licenses-and-generative-ai/

I think someone used ai to mean attribution/alike, international. Which are part of the full name (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) but still make little sense as an acronym next to CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 being the official acronym.

[-] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 24 points 2 months ago

There's no point looking for logic. These people truly believe granting a licence restricts the rights of people who don't agree to the licence, which is the exact opposite of what licenses do. It's blatant misinformation but if you call them out on it (even by quoting their own link) they literally think you're an astroturfer for AI, because that makes more sense to them than the fact they're obviously wrong.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

You don’t understand: these comment footers are the only thing between us and Roko's basilisk.

~ NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE ~ PRIVATE MODE OF COMMUNICATION ~ NO STEP ON SNEK ~

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

i am at a loss what its about.

The only thing worse than the tech-bro's worshiping AI like it's the next messiah and we all must pave way for this revolutionary technology that will only seem to benefit white Americans with disposable income, are the people on the opposite end of the spectrum who are have a hysterical hatred for LLM's because their favorite Youtube streamers are getting clicks by ranting about how bad AI is. They are not being personally impacted by AI at all but are delusional enough to think that there will be laws and regulations and that AI will be "banned" if we all "raise awareness" and it's about as useful as the Bud Lite protests but not even remotely as entertaining.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 34 points 2 months ago

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Spam/misinformation: Not an anti-AI licence.

This person may be confused, but still your tagline is a waste of mods’ time. And just speaking as a user I find it to be annoying visual pollution, especially since I think it’s ineffectual, unless your only goal is to “raise awareness.” Beyond that I think any effectiveness is about as plausible as that of sovereign citizenship.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

"Catching mice is a stupid question."

[-] bulwark@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Well this makes me feel better about my stupid questions on stack overflow.

[-] embed_me@programming.dev 10 points 2 months ago

Look at this fancy person with enough reputation to ask a question

[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 months ago

I know you're trying to make a joke about SO's restrictive rep system, but asking and answering questions doesn't require reputation, at all. If anything, that's where you start building rep.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Emmie@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hot muscular felines as coworkers? Sign me the f up

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

is that tiger using a freebsd laptop

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago

Would buy immediately if they had wifi 5/6

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] itsnotits@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's* still deprecated

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
1157 points (97.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

31687 readers
28 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS