259
"Confederate Army Lt. Col. William F. Beasley gifted the county the monument in 1902."
Barely 100 years old? Fuck it, tear it down. You don't memorialize the losers in a Civil War.
Yep. Doesn't even have historical significance. It's just another of those Jim Crow statues meant to oppress black people after slavery ended. Fucking NC.
It annoyed me that I couldn't see the whole statue. It's just a statue of the local general but another part of the inscription was also interesting:
THE CONFEDERATE SOLDIER WON AND IS ENTITLED TO THE ADMIRATION OF ALL WHO LOVE HONOR, AND LIBERTY.
Uh huh. From a monument built 50 years after the war ended. Physical copium.
THE CONFEDERATE SOLDIER WON
Ah, now I see why conservatives want to learn history from statues.
White slave-owner: ... all those who love honor, and liberty
Black slave: Excuse m--
White slave-owner: Not you!
I’m not an NC resident and I want it gone. That shit is offensive on like a half dozen levels at the very least.
I am not even a US citizen or resident, and I want it gone.
It serves only to embellish history.
Write your Governor. Encourage others to do the same.
Meanwhile at City Hall:
I know getting funding to tear it down can be difficult but hear me out, why don't we just take out the "e" in slaves and repurpose the statue to celebrate our local Slavs by putting a track coat on it.
This would cost a lot less money to do since removing a letter is much less labor intensive than removing an entire statue.
(This is known as the Florence Y'all Approach)
That Wikipedia article was a great read lol
It actually was, though. I fell down the rabbit hole awhile.
Shit do they have the names of all the slaves that killed their masters on it? I would consider that closest to godlyness.
It would almost be better if it’s toppled by a large crowd of people. The people who support such a thing need to see the shitstorm they would rightfully face if they ever said it too loudly.
If by “shitstorm,” you mean “watching all the protestors get waaaay too long prison sentences, then yes
Still kind of relevant today; benevolent big corporate appreciating the work of its faithful office slaves
/s just in case
Not surprising. Drive down 40 from Asheville towards Charlotte and you’ll see 3 or 4 huge confederate flags waving right next to the highway. There’s so many homes and vehicles waving it too all over the place. Folks are loud and proud down there, it’s gross.
Proud of what?
"We used to own slaves but now we can't and still bitter about it"?
It should be illegal to fly confederate flags in the US, like it's illegal to fly Nazi flags in Germany.
Ironically, those that proudly fly a traitor's flag due to their proud heritage generally also think of themselves as patriots. Just like, ironically, those that fly the Gasden flag tend to be bootlickers and also tend to be the same people.
NC is so weird. Many whites there will tell you other than 'reverse racism' that racism doesn't really exist anymore all while being explicitly racist in the next sentence.
What a foul thing to still exist in 2024. I’m sure some chains and a big truck could make short work of the removal.
Pull it out and leave in on the mayor's lawn. It'll be disposed of in no time. You know, even just deface it with a chisel.
Just topple it and make sure the lettering is smashed to fuck.
.
It would be such a shame if some people who lived near there read this article but disregarded all the warnings printed clearly on it.
Some citizens want it gone, others can't believe it's still there at all.
Fuckin Confederate fucks!!
Let me guess, the faithful slaves wants the faithful slaves monument removed?
this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
259 points (99.6% liked)
politics
18821 readers
4696 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS