133
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Biden actually gained a point since last month’s survey, which was taken before the debate. In this poll, he leads Trump 50% to 48% in a head-to-head matchup. But Biden slips when third-party options are introduced, with Trump holding the slightest advantage with 43% to 42%.

Those numbers, though, do not represent statistically significant differences, as the margin of error in the survey is +/- 3.1 percentage points, meaning results could be 3 points higher or lower.

The poll also found that, at this point, no other mainstream Democrat who has been mentioned as a replacement for the president on the ticket does better than Biden.

The results reflect the hyperpolarized political environment in the country and the reality that both of the major parties’ presumptive nominees bring with them significant disadvantages. Majorities of those surveyed continue to say they have a negative opinion of both men, and neither, they say, should be on the ballot at all.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240712121307/https://www.npr.org/2024/07/12/nx-s1-5036518/biden-trump-poll

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 67 points 1 month ago

I'd rather vote for a literal corpse than vote GOP at this point.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago

Be careful what you wish for.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Well personally I'm looking forward to the corpse administration.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's only right they get a representative, they outnumber us. I remember trying to find out the ratio a while ago and it was surprising then and it only gotten more surprising. With all the power of today's estimates provided by google there are roughly 14 dead humans for every human that is currently alive.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Exactly, that's why I always try to drive a few to the polls, usually have one or two in my trunk anyhow.

[-] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

You already had it. Ronny had two terms even.

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Mel Carnahan won his Senate race.

[-] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago

I'm the same, my goal in November is to vote against trump. I would love to be able to vote for a candidate that I think would be a great President, or a good President, or even just not an evil President... but barring a better choice, I'm voting for the Democrat option.

Biden isn't a good choice, but the team he has put together is doing a good job of running things with or without him and I'd be fine keeping that going for another 4 years - or however long he has left. I'd be happier with a more progressive, younger, sharper candidate, but ultimately my goal for this next election is to vote against trump.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I suspect that the debate was an "emperor has no clothes on" moment for Democratic politicians. Everyone already knew that Biden is old but no one who thought that was a big problem wanted to be the first one to say so. (Why risk being sidelined for disloyalty to the party in the case where you speak out but then no one else does?) The debate was just the tipping point that made age an issue the politicians were willing to talk about, but voters don't have the problem with being disloyal that politicians do so they had already taken Biden's age into account in a way that politicians publicly hadn't.

With that said, these national polls are fun for people who watch the election like a sporting event but they're a poor way to actually predict victory. How many electoral college votes each candidate will have is independent from his support in much of the country, where only a catastrophic event could possibly change a state's electoral outcome. Meanwhile in swing states the small difference in polls like this appears to be magnified in Trump's favor.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

National polls are essentially garbage in close elections. They really only say if there's going to be a landslide. The fact nationwide polls are close and getting closer is generally bad for an incumbent.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

With you until the last line. I guess "generally" saves it. I don't think you can say these close polls are bad for Biden, because as you pointed out polling is essentially garbage. I think it's a mix of selection bias and some phenomenon by which some people just lie to pollsters. Even exit polls have been increasingly unreliable.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is not good news.

Reminder:

  • Biden was TEN POINTS ahead of where he is now back in 2020.

  • Biden ASKED for this debate because he was already trailing in the polls and not where he needs to be. At best things remain the same, which is to say poor. At worst, they are worse.

  • 2020 was decided by 40,000 undecided low-info apathetic voters in 3 battleground states. If those people remain apathetic and polls remain this close, Biden will lose.

  • His own campaign staff is now reportedly saying they see no viable path to victory.

Further key points raised in this poll/article:

Nearly two-thirds of the more than 1,300 respondents said they believe Biden lacks the mental fitness to be president. That includes almost 4 in 10 Democrats.

That said, politicians tend to be good political weathervanes, with their own high-quality polling, and several of the Democratic House members who have advocated for Biden to leave the race are from competitive swing districts.

Third parties pull younger voters, Biden doing better with those most likely to vote

When third parties are factored in, Trump and Biden are statistically tied, with Trump at 43% and Biden 42%.

[-] aramis87@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

they believe Biden lacks the mental fitness to be president.

I don't care. I absolutely know that trump lacks the mental, moral, and leadership fitness to be President. And if both candidates were President now and died in their sleep tonight, I have absolute faith that Biden's team would do their best to keep the country running while Trump's team would immediately start dismantling the country and handing the pieces to those least fit to be near power.

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

All due respect to your views and my views, but unless you're my low-info apathetic battleground swing-voter uncle who will decide this election, your opinion and mine matter very little.

If the country were as informed as you and me, then we wouldn't have either of these candidates to begin with.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

It’s good news relative to my expectations which were that things would get worse. But yes, the situation looks quite dire here.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I still remember when the Biden campaign was promising the debate was the moment that was going to turn everything around. That obviously didn't happen, but I also don't know if the debate actually changed anything or just made everybody who was going to vote for Biden/against Trump anyway more depressed without changing their votes.

For whatever this voters' opinion is worth - I think Biden's an overly conservative ass, but I think anyone that's likely to replace would be too, so that's a wash, and as far as the age thing goes I think we've had less functional people in the oval office and figured it out (see; Reagan's second term), so I don't really care about that. I just want Trump to lose and for the DNC political machine to have a major change in their leadership and direction before 2026 and 2028.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

It’s worth noting that NPR’s national newscast mentioned that, with 3rd party candidates, and since Biden is trailing significantly in key swing states, he would need to do be doing better in a national poll if he were to be doing well. Right now the odds are still in Trump’s favor.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

If they're polling "likely voters" then it really shouldn't change. The people most likely to vote are usually also the most engaged, therefore they've already decided. I think most "swings" in the polls are just due to sampling. It's the unlikely or sort of "fair weather" voters that are going to make or break things. Also, gerrymandering and vote suppression.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Nearly two-thirds of the more than 1,300 respondents said they believe Biden lacks the mental fitness to be president. That includes almost 4 in 10 Democrats.

And 60% polled said trump was going to win....

But I'm sure people are going to say this poll is good for Biden.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It doesn't matter who people expect to win and who they consider the underdog. The only thing that matters is who actually gets the most votes.

And in this poll, that person was Biden. So this poll is good news for Biden.

The only thing that matters is who actually gets the most votes.

*In swing states, unfortunately.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And in this poll, that person was Biden. So this poll is good news for Biden.

Factually untrue:

But Biden slips when third-party options are introduced, with Trump holding the slightest advantage with 43% to 42%.

You didn't even have to click the article, OP quoted it in the summary...

Did you not even read that?

Are you going to change your conclusion now?

Or will you act like a trump supporter and change your "logic" so that you still get the conclusion you want?

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

A lot of people are afraid Trump is going to win, and that's motivating them to vote for Biden. The results you're quoting support this.

I want Democrats to think Trump is going to win, otherwise they'll stay home like they did in 2016.

[-] originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not quite. 60% said they don’t think Biden can do the job, not that Trump would win

Edit: read further down and yeah 6 in 10 said they think Trump will win, you right

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I agree things are bad, and I wish we had a better candidate than Biden.

But we don't. Biden is the candidate, and he must win.

I just want to point out that it is a good thing if Democrats are afraid Biden won't win. Overconfidence hurt Clinton in several states. Democrats are going to be talking about it, encouraging their friends to vote, shaming people for supporting Trump, and freaking out about another Trump presidency. We don't want complacency.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I see every headline references "polls" now. That's bad.

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Suppose the "best case" scenario for Biden materializes. He hangs on, remains the nominee, and pulls an upset against Trump in November.

Even in this scenario, I'd argue that his legacy is irrevocably tarnished. His decision in 2022/2023 to run would still be a terrible decision, like a poker player betting the whole pot on a horrible hand and winning by dumb luck. His staff would still be complicit in lying to the world. It would be the shabbiest victory imaginable... and all that before the question of how he lasts another four years in office.

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago

None of that matters as much as beating Trump tho

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, he said exactly that in the speech last night. Didn't anyone watch it?

Someone asked him "What about your legacy?" He said he didn't care about his legacy, he cares about "finishing the job" and getting things done for the United States of America. That's exactly what you want to hear from a presidential candidate.

"Legacy" is something journalists care about because they don't do anything tangible. They just write articles about people who actually do things. Biden's focus on action actually made me like him more.

[-] cyd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's the point. Biden's legacy is most likely a Trump second term, alongside a Republican Senate and House. Even if he wins by dumb luck, it would still have been a bad decision, like a bad poker play that wins.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that's about what I expected. No one cares that Biden is a low-energy gaff machine, because he wouldn't've ever been president. Biden had the opportunity to rise above expectations, and he failed. But that just means he performed as expected, and no one is going to think less of him for it.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The results reflect the hyperpolarized political environment in the country and the reality that both of the major parties’ presumptive nominees bring with them significant disadvantages.

“This is an unpleasant rematch with two unpopular people,” said Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion, “but Biden gets points for honesty and character.

A Democratic presidential candidate typically needs a wider margin in national polls for that to translate to an Electoral College victory because of the nature of swing states.

That said, politicians tend to be good political weathervanes, with their own high-quality polling, and several of the Democratic House members who have advocated for Biden to leave the race are from competitive swing districts.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pulled 8%, tied for the lowest support for him since Marist started including him in the survey in April.

Vice President Kamala Harris, the most likely successor if Biden were to decide against continuing his campaign, also gets 50% compared to 49% for Trump.


The original article contains 932 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
133 points (90.3% liked)

politics

18586 readers
4541 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS