944
This one's a doozy (sh.itjust.works)
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 month ago

Third panel: Sex offender running for president gets shot, and survives.

[-] meant2live218@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Am I crazy for not wanting anyone to get shot? I know how crazy our politics are getting, and I'm afraid of the future, but we shouldn't be wanting anyone to be shot at. Life is life, even if it's attached to the absolute worst person on Earth. Sure, lock up people who are a danger to society, but let's not celebrate gun violence.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Trump is responsible for locking people in cages and having them die in there. And after being notified he doubled down on it. And many other acts that have led to people's deaths.

Why are murderers above being murdered?

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you want to talk about justice you need to maintain superior standards and morals.

Your argument is no better than the "Saudi Arabia doesn't allow the building of churches, so why do we allow the building of mosques?" The answer is that we're better than fucking Saudi Arabia.

Eye for an eye types of justice quickly become escalated and end up in a race to the bottom.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago

Killing Nazis IS superior standards and morals. What, you gonna tell me liberating Auschwitz was wrong because the Allies used violence? You gonna say it makes them no better than the Nazis to solve problems with guns?

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

I don't think an assassination attempt on Trump is equal to ending fascism in WWII, although I understand why it is tempting to draw a comparison.

If you want to try normalising and rationalising assassination attempts on world leaders, then don't act surprised when someone comes for the one you support.

No matter how much you hate Trump, this act should absolutely be condemned.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I would be very happy if the democrats assassinated Trump and the Republicans killed Biden. Problem solved!

But if you mean "what if the CIA assassinated communist leaders", uhhhhhh they already do.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I think any endorsement of violence is absolutely terrible and wanting leaders shot is an extremly slippery slope.

That's not what I meant but it's also something that I don't endorse.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Tolerating intolerance is intolerant. If you allow there to be people in your government who assassinate communist leaders, lock babies in cages, and deny lifesaving healthcare to minorities, then that stuff is gonna happen. Problems with society member got solved with wishful thinking and fairy dust. They got solved with blood. The Nazis had to be shot. The crusaders had to be stabbed. The conquistadores ought to have got arrows in their throats. It's the same in fiction, too. Luke Skywalker didn't get rid of the Death Star by sitting down and talking with Darth Vader, he used a bomb. Frodo and Aragorn didn't defeat Sauron by voting, they used their swords. The Avengers didn't debate Thanos into leaving them alone, they cut off his head with a magic axe.

What on earth do you think we're supposed to do with Nazis except kill them?

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've already stated that equating killing Trump to ending fascism is a bit of a stretch. And you can tell me until you're blue in the face about how much you want Trump killed, I disagree, I think it sets a terrible precedent.

This is real life not a fantasy film.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Alright, thanks for dodging the question and regurgitating thought terminating cliches.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yh we've both been repeating ourselves. I'm not going to change your mind, you're not going to change mine.

All I have left to say is that I hope that there isn't someone else out there who thinks it's OK to kill someone they hate and who then decides that they hate people like you.

[-] meant2live218@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Because we don't have to be all "law of the wild." Murderers deserve imprisonment, not death and endangerment.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

Wanting to shoot Nazis is patriotic

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

You need to be careful that you don't become what you hate. There are always going to be people that you disagree with on the strongest levels.

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I know. Killing fascists is a full time job.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

How many have you killed? Zero? Shut the fuck up then.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

These people are the leftist equivalent of the special forces spaghetti. It's fucking weird how little self awareness they have.

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

If I believed everything people think Trump would do if elected, how could you ethically not want to do it yourself?

Put every marginalized person on one track and trump on the other. Do you pull the lever?

[-] meant2live218@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Then I ask you: if this is how you rationalize the violence, what prevents you from doing the same?

In a different vein of thought, does this same argument justify those on the far right who are frightened (logically or illogically) of the left threatening violence on their perceived opponents?

[-] PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Then I ask you: if this is how you rationalize the violence, what prevents you from doing the same?

Faith in humanity? Optimism? If the gas trucks roll out I won't last long, but I'm not convinced terror is inevitable if Trump wins.

In a different vein of thought, does this same argument justify those on the far right who are frightened (logically or illogically) of the left threatening violence on their perceived opponents?

Most of the right's concerns are amorphous nuttery. The left's concerns are very concrete and frightening. They also have evidence (such as 2025) to back them up.

If they're honest about their concerns, I really don't know what to think about doing nothing about it. What are you willing to sacrifice to prevent a holocaust? At the very least we should all be quietly arming ourselves. Prefer private transactions.

My belief in robust self defense matches that of most self defense laws, and I'd wait until they're killin' to support armed resistance.

[-] Twelve20two@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

If anything, everybody should really, really, really start doing workouts at home and try to get some cardio in, too

[-] Twelve20two@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

The supreme court has kinda set things up so that he won't face prison, though.

Presidents being shot is not unprecedented.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Right. Endorsements of violence are not Ok just because you hate an individual.

And to anyone endorsing what happened, I certainly hope that a group of violent people or a violent individual never decide that they hate you.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Shot AT- if it’s even true. He’s not a victim.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Being shot at still makes one a victim of a shooting. Unless you wanna clarify that to all the kids at Sandy Hook, Uvalse, and the myriad others in this country.

Meanwhile, if the shooter had better aim, we'd have a better country.

[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

nah, trump isn't what make your country that shit hole, it's your's "democracy" that create them, killing trump would only made him martyr

[-] MetaCubed@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Being shot at does make one a shooting victim, even if the rounds missed.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

You're missing a key point. Victim implies they suffered, where in trumps own words he should just get over it.

[-] III@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Now is not the time to be talking about gun control. Think of the family.

[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Hey, gun control is a very serious issue.

I suspect the shooter picked an incorrect weapon and this negatively affected their ability to accurately place shots center of mass.

[-] III@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I don't think Alex Jones would agree with you.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

good thing we're not asking one of the worst people ever what he thinks about our opinions, isn't it?

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago

The bullet hit a teleprompter. He wasn’t shot. He was shot at. He’s not a shooting victim. He’s a teleprompter that got shot victim.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Maybe Katie Johnson said enough is enough

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sounds like it was glass from the teleprompter that got him (shooter shot the teleprompter?)

Edit: Turnip is now claiming a bullet hit him. Not sure which story is true

[-] SlothMama@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Turnip? Intentional or hilarious unintentional typo?

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Intentional

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Now they are saying his foot was on the line!

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Need more of these loaded

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
944 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

5033 readers
2779 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS