48
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

We should be getting someone in their 40s to groom them for their own presidential run.

But short term Kelly is the smart choice. An astronaut from Arizona is a no brainer.

I know nothing about his politics, but just from the optics of being an astronaut and his home state, he's the smart pick.

[-] Bernie_Sandals@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

He also has a twin brother who is also an astronaut, that means double the campaigning and no one will know! /s

For real though, Kelly would probably be a great choice, if nothing more than because his politics are at least okay, and his career hopefully makes it really really hard for Republicans to criticize him.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

How cool would it be to have twin astronauts as Prez and VP?

Just think of the twinanigans!

[-] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

The USA can be the second homozygotic state after Poland.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/wbna13800932

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Body double without the extra work. Putin is so jealous.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It would just break Republicans minds. And I think at least some of them would say it's a government cloning program and there's 100s of Mark Kelly's.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I really don't like that Kelly worked with Joe Manchin to attack the environment - https://web.archive.org/web/20240710182356/https://www.eenews.net/articles/manchin-kelly-urge-biden-to-open-new-gulf-oil-leasing/

Out of all the likely names I've seen, Roy Cooper (well liked governor from a swing state) seems like the one with the fewest turds on his record. He made some rough pro-Israel statements in October, but when progressives in his state complained he met with them and started stressing the need to protect Palestinian civilians after that (who had just gone entirely unmentioned in his first statements).

e; ftr, either way I'm voting for Harris

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Welp, that fucking sucks...

But hey, if he's the VP he gets taken out of the Senate and replaced...

So if anything I'd say that's more of a reason to make him vp lol.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

The VP is president of the Senate and has the tiebreaking vote

Not to mention, his wife was a politician who survived an assassination attempt - she was shot in the head and had to relearn a lot of basic tasks. Takes a bit of the wind out of Trumps sails on that front.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I wouldn't mind an astronaut. At all. He'd probably kick our space program in the ass and we can finally get that moon base done.

I read that most people that go up there, after they come back, their entire worldview changes from what they thought before, and all petty human issues become meaningless. You finally realize how precious life on Earth is, and how small we are. It's a documented phenomenon.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

I don't know if he's ever been to space. Most astronauts never go.

It's one of those "right place, right time" things.

Even if you'd be the best astronaut ever you need a mission to happen that requires your subject matter in a very short window.

Still undeniable badasses

[-] Kimano@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

He has. He and his twin brother were actually part of a study into the effects of long term space habitation (his trips were shorter). They're the only two siblings to ever both go to space.

[-] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

I don’t know if he’s ever been to space.

Shame there's absolutely no way in the world we can ever know if he's been to space. We'll just have to guess because of lack of recorded history.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

I dislike this VP->President pipeline it's deeply undemocratic... we should stop making that a thing.

[-] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 2 points 4 months ago

I mean, the VP does still have to win elections to get there, it's not really undemocratic in that regard, there's no garuntee. And it probably gives more relevant experience to the position than just about any other job

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I dislike the concept of a former VP rolling in as a presumptive nominee - I think it's fine for them to enter the race but being able to chose someone else during the primary is how we stay responsive to what excites people. It's important to remember that we essentially skipped this primary because no serious politicians would dare run against an incumbent because... tradition... and that's how we got in this fix in the first place.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

Better than father -> son or husband -> wife

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

Yes, it's better than literal nepotism... but I think we as a country can aim higher than "At least we're not literally a hereditary monarchy".

[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Seems like a good list of people who don't fuck couches.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Someone have the list?

[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung was asked by reporters during a rally on Wednesday whether the former president has said anything about Harris’ possible running mate.

“There is a short list of governors and senators. They are all interchangeable,” Cheung said. “It doesn’t matter.”

Imagine being this flippant about your job to try and defeat another political party in an election. "Yeah I don't care who she picks we're running the same hate campaign either way."

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

She should pick Biden. Then nobody has to replace their bumper stickers.

[-] TwentySeven@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

But they need to sell bumper stickers to fund the campaign!

this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
48 points (86.4% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2244 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS