672
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 117 points 3 months ago
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 89 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I hope they use an empty lectern and focus at it every time Kamala mentions Trump.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 39 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Naw. Use a cardboard cutout, and have recorded statements of his that then she can play according to a little prearranged sounding board. Play some of his greatest hits, like grab ‘em by the pussy. Play back some of his Biden debate answers and go into depth as to why they are false. Play a little montage of things he was saying about how COVID’s not that big a deal.

You can set it up a HELL of a lot better than just her giving a speech and focusing on an empty lectern. You can still have an exchange between the two of them without needing him to be there. And then, have her finish it up by saying hey Donald there was a lot of stuff I didn’t get to. We’re gonna do this again in two weeks; if you want to be here we can do a debate, and if not, no biggie, I’ll just pick up where I left off. Let us know and all the best.

Oh, and then at the very end play back him saying any time, any place, and just sort of shrug and look around confused, like you’re searching for him somewhere on the debate stage. And then say all right then, see you in two weeks I guess, maybe, and then wave to the crowd and say all of y’all have a good night.

[-] Nurgus@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A British politician once failed to show up for a panel show and they replaced him with a literal tub of lard. For the whole thirty minutes.

It seems fitting for Trump.

Link in case anyone cares: (be warned, it's old TV) https://youtu.be/3dZMvrClypM

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

I hope they place a chicken in a bad toupee at the otherwise empty lectern.

[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 7 points 3 months ago

Put a bag of cheeto's there, and have her refer to him as 34 time convicted felon. Don't say his name, he's not worth it.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 64 points 3 months ago

Maybe Old Man Trump forgot he agreed to this specific debate with Harris? He's weird, but give him the benefit of the doubt (until he doesn't show up).

[-] Rob@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

You mean the senile senior, Dementia Don? 34 times convicted felon and racist rapist?

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

We cannot be certain it is age-related dementia. It might be from syphilis or drug abuse. He is indeed too old for this job, regardless.

[-] remotedev@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

He goes by many names, and pronouns

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

He goes by many names, and pronouns

Weird is one now.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

DonOLD needs a reminder - that's weird.

[-] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 5 points 3 months ago

Well, everyone is saying it! Poor Sleepy duhnOLD can't say the Vice President's first name correctly despite having known about her for many many years. Even now he has trouble! Not just sad. Weird!

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago

Something about petards and vertical displacement comes to mind

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

I hope he tries to make a last minute appearance and gets turned away.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 60 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because they do a civics test and they won't let him in.

Edit- that was supposed to say covid test, but if the ignorance fits...

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

We would've dodged Donald and Ronald if presidents had to pass a civics test or dementia screening.

[-] quicklime@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

"Where would we be without this great country of ours?" -- Ronald Reagan

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

No, if he shows up at the last minute, and complies with the pre-negotiated terms, they should let him in. If he shows up at the last minute and complains about he fact-checkers or the moderators or the lack of couches, to try to renegotiate things at the last minute, they should just tell him to pound sand.

[-] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago

Then he'll say that Crooked Kamala & the Fake News Media™ (great band name, btw) wouldn't let him in the debate because they were scared to debate him!

His base would eat that shit up, not realizing that he's basically trying to bring a bowling ball to a basketball game, taking his ball & going home, then complaining that no one will let him play.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Right, that's when you just ignore his tantrum and go on and have the debate without him. His base is not gonna listen to reason, no matter what. Harris's goal should be to persuade the people who are not down the rabbit hole to show up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago
[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

I'll keep repeating it: send Baldwin on and have Harris fake shoot him

[-] Draegur@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

And make sure it REALLY IS a "cold gun" this time.

Even then, after the Rust incident, I don't imagine Baldwin is in much of a mood to participate as a trump standee in the first place, let alone in a skit that might give him PTSD flashbacks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ech@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Incredibly disrespectful to the deceased.

[-] Entropywins@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Not everyone's the same but I'd appreciate people putting some laughter in the world due to my tragic avoidable death if it were me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Flip-flopping weirdo “Lyin’ Don” the bombastic orange makeup wearing racist rapist, lied again

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

She should just take all the crazy stupid s*** he's been saying on the campaign trail and debate against it.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

That would be great. If Trump doesn't come she can just take his turn for him, "What former President Trump, who was to scared to be here, has stated on the issue..."

[-] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago

Or just use canned video of him talking, complete with date/time/location stamp and a QR code to the full video so nobody accuses them of taking things out of context.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Yes. They can then string segments of different videos together for the debate so Trump stays on topic for the first time ever.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 3 months ago

And Fox will give Trump equal amount during the same time slot, thus completely defeating the entire purpose of a debate.

I think there needs to he three televised debates between presidential candidates, by law. Two for VP. All on PBS, C-SPAN, Twitch, YouTube and whichever network decides to participate.

More information, by law, or you don't get to play.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 months ago

Discord Trump vs Kamala twitch debate

[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Discord kitten Trump. There. You made me say it. “MAGA uwu”

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Good, Anakin, good

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

It doesn't matter if he gets equal time on fox. The people that will watch that are going to anyway, and the people that won't, won't. He doesn't have anything new to say and no one is wondering what his policies are. The only people that matter are the ones who are on the fence with Harris. And more serious people will watch her on almost anything other than fox. Let him go on fox and reeeeee into that sycophant echo chamber all he wants.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Saw somewhere that fat orange wants to debate her at fox news. heh

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Compromise: Host the debate on Fox, but have the lady that confronted him with his own words at the National Association of Black Journalists event be the moderator.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
672 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19086 readers
4214 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS