886
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] swordgeek@lemmy.ca 189 points 1 month ago

Convicted PEDOPHILE rapist!

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago

Why do so many headlines leave that part out? I swear like half the headlines don't feel that needs to be mentioned when it's really a huge fucking part of the story.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

if you're genuinely curious: my bet is to avoid lawsuits. mind that people who use the word pedophile colloquially usually mean people who prey on children.

in reality, pedophilia is not a legal term and not a part of the crimes or charges. it's a psychiatric disorder and in itself not the crime. laws are not concerned with the disorder so long as the person does not act on it.

on the legal side, crimes like statutory rape, child sexual abuse, or whatever it may be, are independent of the disorder and i would imagine a lot of people who engage in it might not have it; as sexual abuse is more often than not about power, not attraction.

so i imagine shit stain perpetrators like this can technically say they're not pedophiles as they aren't legally found to be so and sue for defamation. so media sticks to the legal terms.

that being said, even if they don't use the word, they should mention that the victim was a 12 year old. so instead of pedophile rapist, it can say rapist of 12 year old. afaik that's legally and technically true and shouldn't be a legal liability.

disclaimer that these are opinions of a layman, and I'm not a lawyer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yarrage@sh.itjust.works 163 points 1 month ago

As a Dutch guy I feel compelled to apologize for our national olypic committee selecting and sending this douche nozzle to Paris.

[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 62 points 1 month ago

He's still going to be representing the team in the next competition. You guys need to make sure your government knows it's not ok to send child groomer rapists onto the world stage to represent you. And his teammates seem to be ok with playing aside him again.

“If I can speak for him, after the match we lost, we were disappointed,” Immers said of his teammate Van de Velde. “But we said to each other: ‘Look what we did together. Look how hard we fought with all the attention.’ We stayed together. We cried together off the field and said, ‘OK, let’s just enjoy this moment.’ And we did that. So I’m happy we did it that way.”

Van de Velde and Immers will play together next in the European championships in the Netherlands right after the Olympics, and then the Dutch championships.

Sorry, but this is kind of fucked up. No offense to you personally, but my opinion of the Dutch just took a nosedive.

load more comments (46 replies)
[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fellow embarrassed Dutch guy chiming in.

Edit: why did I get down voted for being an embarrassed Dutch guy? LOL, that's what we are!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

That right there is more remorse than I've seen from the rapist himself...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 78 points 1 month ago

Let's do politicians next.

[-] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

Fucking finally. Price of shit rapist. Maybe the Dutch will reform their legal system in-time for the next Olympics?

[-] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 month ago

Im not sure if any legal system would say a felon cant join the olympics. Unless you mean having draconian punishments like the US. Then no, I hope they dont damage their legal system to become that corrupt.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 46 points 1 month ago

He got 13 months for rape and only one of those months was actually their choice the other 12 was the UK government's choice. Essentially they thought that one month of imprisonment for rape was acceptable.

They clearly need some change.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago

only if booing was able to remove pedophile and rapist politicians from power too

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TwinTusks@bitforged.space 40 points 1 month ago

He's only 29, this is gonna haunt him for a LONG LONG time.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 86 points 1 month ago

It might even ruin his chances for getting to the Olympics and representing his country on the world stage.

[-] TwinTusks@bitforged.space 15 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 month ago

I'm very conflicted about this whole thing. On the one hand, yeah it's kind of a scandal and people have every right to be booing him every time he touches the ball.

On the other hand, he was convicted, sentenced, did time and is now back in society apparently showing remorse. People are calling for his career to end and various wishes of death on him. Why can't he continue his life?

Are we supposed to lock up all criminals forever? Kill them? Just not allow them to follow their chosen career after getting out? Or is it just sports they shouldn't be allowed to participate in?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 120 points 1 month ago

apparently showing remorse

He showed no remorse. He called it nonsense. He said he made mistakes as a youth. He has not even bothered to offer anything in the way of an apology.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 month ago

He did barely a year of prison... I personally don't quite think it's enough for raping a kid, but hey that's just my opinion

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

It seems like a lot of criminals who "did their time" really didn't do much at all.

Compare that to a lifetime of hurt caused to the victim(s) and their families, and it just doesn't seem good enough.

load more comments (34 replies)
[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

It's a good thing the court of public opinion still has a voice and doesn't approve of child rapists quite so heartily as the Dutch government. What "time" did he do - like 11months? And he was never remorseful in the slightest. If his only real punishment is going to be him and his country getting booed by the world at the Olympics, I'm happy there's at least that.

[-] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

did time and is now back in society apparently showing remorse.

Nope, neither of those.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 1 month ago

On the other hand, he was convicted, sentenced, did time and is now back in society apparently showing remorse.

He hardly did any time at all. Frankly you do more time for a parking ticket. Also when did he show remorse like whenever has he ever shown any remorse at all?

[-] 100@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago

he can continue his life, but get the fuck out of public positions like this if youre a fucking pedo rapist

[-] Tja@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago

How about "not put them representing your country, where other people might understand that as an endorsement as see him as a role model".

There is shades of grey between "killing him" and "send him to the Olympics".

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago

Every time a rapist is sad or something bad happens to them, I smile. The worse the event, the happier I am. Death should be their only release from torture. I accept no less and grant no pity, no matter how bad it gets for them.

And it goes double for Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Good for the crowd.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Sad. Hope he doesn't fall into a wheat thresher on his way to the loser's bunks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] amanda@aggregatet.org 17 points 1 month ago

How is there no mechanism to remove him? I mean, ideally he shouldn’t have been selected in the first place but under the insanely charitable assumption that it was sloppiness and not active negligence that recruited him.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago

It's not the Olympic organizers' job to disqualify someone based on how immoral, criminal, of poor character or despicable a person is (on who's laws anyway?). This is a major failure on the country's olympic committee selecting these people to represent themselves to the world.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
886 points (98.0% liked)

World News

38492 readers
2897 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS