Do people really do that?

My dude, all fancy, expensive brand have their logo plaster on their product. Uniqlo sell BRAND printed on their shirt, depend on who they work with at the time. People also wear shirt with band or pop culture printed on it as well. People pay premium price for bags like chanel or lv just for that logo. Ford have their stupid name displayed in ultra large size on their stupid truck front grille. It's all brand ads.

All the "luxury" clothes with big logos are low tier variants and the really luxury ones have more decent design.

At least that's what I've heard, I don't buy "luxury" brands, I like my clothes clean and brand free.

I wear band t-shirts, but I feel like wearing a T-shirt the bassist handed to you at a show is s different category

IDK if it's the ADHD or the autism, but I hate logos on clothes.

It's neither; you are just a person of some integrity and intelligence. Nothing wrong with paying more for quality and durability, but if you're paying more to be a walking ad, well... let's just say it's not flattering look. (I get that not everyone are sensitive to these things though, and that unbranded clothes are hard to find.)

I refuse to buy anything with a visible brand - I even remove the neck and washing labels inside of garments. When I bought it, it's mine, it's not [brand name]s anymore. Sneakers and similar shoes are harder to find unbranded, sometimes you can remove sown-on labels, sometimes I even tape over labels with black tape.

It actually makes wearing the clothes a much better experience as well. Instead of thinking that I'm wearing a shirt from [expensive brand], I see the shirt for what it is.

I didn't pay much attention to the fact that I was an advertisment, but in the last few years I realized it and got really intolerant of ~any cloth that uses its brand name/logo as its design. (And I prefer it even more if there is no logo of the company on the outside of the cloth at all.)

They should do better, they should come up with better designs or just use plain colors. I dont want to have their brand name on me.

(They could also play with the shape, not just the colors of the clothes, but gendered/fast fashion has decided that men shouldn't have many options, especially on that aspect..)

I've got some old polo shirts from my dad's closet that I still wear. The material is sturdy, easy to clean, and doesn't noticeably fade over time. Tiny little logo on the breast, but it's this shade of blue I swear you can't find in stores anymore. Looks good, fits good, feels good on my skin. This shirt is easily 20 years old.

I got to the store to buy a new polo and the logo is practically across my chest. The stitching is already fraying. Fades after the first wash. Paper thin and easily torn. It'll be in the rag pile inside two years.

They really don't make'm like they used to

Yo, that's $590 for a t-shirt

If you like nice shirts with no design or logo, Kohl's has some really comfortable shirts in several colors and no logo at all. They're some of my favorite shirts right now.

Store brand tshirts from places like C&A are often entirely plain, meanwhile expensive brands like Gucci are all about plastering their logo everywhere. I'd be surprised if Gucci shirts actually had lower production costs than C&A shirts.

An individual with refinement and culture

Ironic how that video is blocked in the US due to copyright.

Someone will think you're more refined if you don't watch a YouTube ad though, whether it's through ad blocker or premium, that's the comparison you should be making.

True, but I do get irrationally mad if someone else wants to show me something and there are several ads before it.

they pay me $13 an hour to be a walking Publix ad 😔

I don't mind wearing shirts with brands on em, just not clothing brands. I love wearing tshirts with old company logos or weird stuff like froot loops or a vintage coca cola shirt.