366
submitted 4 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 95 points 4 months ago

Good on NPR and the effort to fact check that dumpster fire must have been exhausting, but the damage is already done. No would-be Trump voter is going to read this and change their mind on anything. The only thing that could make a difference is live fact checking and calling Trump out as he makes the statements.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 53 points 4 months ago

They think NPR is state run and operated deep state propaganda

[-] Godort@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago

Well obviously that sub-1% revenue they get from places like the board of education means that the state has a controlling share, right?

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 25 points 4 months ago

They don't care that he's lying. Doing it in real time would make absolutely no difference

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 23 points 4 months ago

To his base, no. His base is lost for the world bar some extremely large scale cult-deprogramming. But for independents and undecideds it would still matter to not let the lies linger in the air. Not that it will ever happen, of course.

The comment I replied to was specifically talking about his base.

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You replied to my comment, though? That's why I clarified.

EDIT: I concede I might have worded it poorly. What I meant was: his base isn't going to change his mind regardless and few undecideds/independents will read this. But live fact-checking and calling Trump out properly could affect the latter group.

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

~~They~~ His base don't care that he's lying. Doing it in real time would make absolutely no difference

Would've been clearer if you specified your comment.

I agree his base is a lost cause, but live fact checking would absolutely make a difference to the uneducated brain rotted masses that are just going with the flow.

Calling him out as a lair to his face live on the air might even make him snap. Sadly no one has the balls to do it.

[-] ArbiterXero@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

And that’s terrifying

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

Every news channel must display his lies count and lies-per-minute of speech (lie rate) whenever they broadcast his campaign coverage. That should be the bare minimum standard

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 14 points 4 months ago

What, do you want us to run out of numbers?

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Make it a counter like “ObAmA NaTioNAL DeBT CoUNteR” and display/project it on wall behind Trump at his own rally

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Haven't read this because "water is wet"....but was the only thing he said that was true was "the"...

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago

Back in 2016 I got into it online with a MAGoo. Trump had just plead guilty to defrauding people with Trump University. The MAGoo said that it was the fault of the students for not reading the terms and conditions properly. They really thought Trump was on their side. The lies don't matter because he's 'their guy.'

[-] some_guy 10 points 4 months ago

I started to peruse the list and was burned out by number ten. I already know he lies with nearly every sentence. My time is more valuable than that. Although the stat that it was nearly two lies per minute was helpful in terms of quantifying what we already knew.

[-] workerONE@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

They need to do this in real time as he's trying to talk.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Wouldn’t it be easier to truth check rather than fact check. The owner of truth social has said zero truths this speech. Same as last speech

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

The party of fiscal responsibility that constantly grows our national debt every time they are in office

The party of Lincoln that actively works to make life harder for minorities

The party of pro-life that stops caring about the child once it leaves the womb

The party of 'child protectors' with a ridiculous number of convicted child molesters sitting in high government positions

I'm beginning to thing that these repugnicans might not be very honest...

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
366 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19233 readers
2175 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS