787

The GOP hold on most of American radio seems pretty unshakable, but Democrats must get into the talk-radio game before ever more damage is done.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 110 points 1 month ago

There should be regulation around use of the word "news". Many of these stations call themselves "News Radio" as if they only reported verifiable facts, but well over 50% is opinion.

[-] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

Anything presented as news should be kept separate from opinion. If it's news, you should be able to defend it like it was said under oath.

Personally, I would love it if news channels had to distinguish opinion content from news by removing the word news from the screen and replacing it with the word opinion. That or some other clear and unmistakable signal to the audience should be there to establish whether the station is going on record and asserting facts or whether this is some talking head spewing bullshit.

[-] Scrawny@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

It's crazy that news papers have been doing this forever. You have your news section and opinion and editorial section. TV and radio should definitely follow the format and be clear about what they are presenting.

load more comments (1 replies)

Speaking of regulation, their hateful opinions getting such a far reach is a direct result of the telocommunications act of '96

[-] IcePee@lemmy.beru.co 11 points 1 month ago

Whilst the act for which you speak definitely accelerated the bullshit, it wasn't peaches and cream back in the day. Just look at the film Citizen Kane a fictitious (and lawsuit resistant) depiction of William Randolph Hearst. In it an exceptionally wealthy business man uses the media to promote his political aims. And to skew narratives outside of strict politics. A man who craves love and adoration but can't reciprocate. Remind you of anyone? I would say Musk's purchase of Twitter fills at least one of those molds, Trump the rest.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

True and by way of conversation, Chinatown (1973) might as well have been made yesterday.

[-] Coach@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The milk and meat industry lost their shit when soy milk companies started calling their product "milk." The same outrage should be spent on these "news" organizations.

[-] Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world 92 points 1 month ago

They tried with air America and it was ok but not really all that compelling. Truth and facts just don't sell like toxic divisive fantasies.

[-] Repelle@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Isn’t that how we got the national treasure that is Rachel Maddow?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 77 points 1 month ago

Ronald Reagan started the fight to get rid of the Fairness Doctrine.

Back in the Cronkite Era, if a station ran an editorial it had to provide equal time for opposing views.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 46 points 1 month ago

Rush Limbaugh and his gross career owes its entire existence to that. He is someone who believes that drug dealers and smugglers need to be shot without trial... and he himself was a drug dealer when he was hard for cash.

Tells you a good deal of what kind of person we're dealing with here.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

He is someone who believes...

I just want to point out that this dude is dead in case you hadn't heard that piece of good news.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Oh I know he's dead. Best part is he is so old school that he dies at the age of 70. Which was the life expectancy of that time period.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

that probably ranks near the bottom of the worst things he's said and done list.

[-] GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

And Clinton put the final nail in the coffin with the telecom Reform Act.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Reagan/Bush era lasted 1988 to 1992.

But yeah, let's blame Clinton and ignore the GOP controlled Congress.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hold my beer!

-The Telecommunications Act of 1996

[-] GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee 65 points 1 month ago

US fascism had been here for decades. Too many people don't recognize fascism because they think fascism will arrive selling oppression and tyranny. If you're part of the privileged group fascism is selling you safety, normalcy, and tradition. (status quo)

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

The key point is they are selling BULLSHIT. Even if you are of the right color / party, you are one misstep away from being burned at the stake.

That's what most of these MAGA morons don't realize, they aren't going to be the rulers, they'll be cannon fodder for the 1%, and even part of the 1% IE Muskrat will have to watch their backs.

Fascism benefits no-one in reality... Even the leaders of the movement are constantly watching their backs because their allies are scumbags like themselves.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

The big shift from Truman to Trump has been the number of domestic residents benefiting from our fascist policies. That number is shrinking year after year.

Half a century ago, you could talk to a rising tide carrying all our ships. Did that tide come from blood spilled in Africa, the Middle East, and the Pacific Rim? Sure. But that wasn't our problem.

Now we're seeing the kind of brutal police tactics reserved for Vietnam and Iraq show up in Florida and on the Columbia University campus. We've got paramilitary goons targeting Haitians in Ohio, rather than in Haiti. We're increasingly reliant on prison labor to do the work of historical migrant labor. Our agitation against China isn't generating jobs in the MIC nearly as fast as it's killing jobs in the civilian sector.

If you’re part of the privileged group fascism is selling you safety, normalcy, and tradition.

A big goal of the AI Revolution is to shrink the number of people the Executive tier have to pay in order to keep their positions. And even executive positions are consolidating as businesses merge and buy one another out.

It's terrifying everyone, and Trump is just the guy who figured out how to sell traditional Republican voters a way out. Traditional Republican leaders only know how to preach austerity and justify poverty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 month ago

Even in Canada. Most talk radio stations are right wing hate BS.

[-] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

That’s why we need to defend cbc

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

And also strict regulation regarding broadcasted information. There ought to be fines for misinformation. Spreading lies and hate shouldn't count as "free speech".

[-] rf_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Go to the top podcast lists and you’ll see that one is also dominated by right-wing personalities too.

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Those that talk the most are usually the ones you should listen to the least.

[-] eacapesamsara@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago

US fascism arrived before radio was invented.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 21 points 1 month ago

"Has arrived," as though it hasn't been churning just beneath the surface since the beginning, and succeeding in lifting its filthy maw above the water line many, many times.

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

No one who wants to hear what the left-of-right has to say listens to talk radio, but everyone who needs to hear it listens to talk radio.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 15 points 1 month ago

You can literally see the generational technical divide which is not clean.

I'd bet most households /car owners could have their age and political alignments rated solely on a few metrics.

  • Do you watch cable? Do you stream shows? Do you pirate.

  • Do you own a car? Use the radio or Bluetooth? Have a Spotify or YouTube account?

You'd easily see people's politics fit in with where they get their content.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Car use wouldn't be a good metric in the US (maybe more so in other countries). It's too necessary in most places. But otherwise I agree.

Talk radio is a bastion of old white men. Trying to sway it is a lost cause. The only hope is out lasting their deaths.

If Harris wins I think we have good shot of things moving back towards sanity, especially if she lasts two terms.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago
[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

I don’t think there’s been one since Air America. Al Franken hung out there. Rachel Maddow.

[-] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Talk radio is essentially a person telling you what to think and feel. It can't even be classified as learning because it's being done to you when you listen. It's a confirmation bias circle jerk. Democrats tend to be educated and educated people usually are repelled by the format.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

I think NPR does a good job providing talk radio type material that isn't repellant to people with critical thinking skills.

Do you consider their offerings substantially different than talk radio?

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

NPR usually has a diversity of views and the dialogue isn’t as 24/7 emotional.

I think the big thing with conservative talk radio is that it’s the verbal equivalent of Micheal Bay - 24/7 PAY ATTENTION RIGHT NOW. Think Alex Jones’s incoherent screaming rants as he plays air raid sirens. He does have guests/callers, but any views that he doesn’t agree with will get shouted down. (He has the illusion of disagreement with more explicitly racist guests - he won’t boot you off if you start talking about the Jews, but will pretend he’s a little uncomfortable). But it’s lots of yelling, and THEY ARE TRYING TO CUT YOUR SONS PENIS OFF! Pretty sure that format goes back through Rush to Hicks.

NPR doesn’t really tell you what to think. It comes across as left leaning because the Overton window in the US has been pushed so far to the right that our Democrats have the positions that Republicans did 20 years ago, while our Republican Party is fantasizing about purges. But NPR has calm, reasoned discussions between folks of all political persuasions. You can even hear it in the voices - it’s a common punchline how calm the reporters are.

It’s not the talk format - it’s the content and presentation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Honestly radio is dying much like television.

Podcasting is the better space to get going.

Also tictoc.

We need to get the young folks of the incel pipeline .

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Podcasting is the better space to get going.

Joe Rogan and other right-wing cranks.

Also tictoc.

A significant part of the rise of fascism in Europe among young people.

Anyway I do like podcasts, and it's full of good content (and so is tiktok presumably) but neither are lacking right-wing content.

[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's better in my opinion to meet people where they're at. Radio isn't where they're at. That was my point.

The Majority Report on YouTube is fantastic.

The Daily Beans.

Beau of the Fifth Column.

I've Had it Podcast.

Vaush.

Pod Save America.

Bad Hasbara.

There are many more, but it's a matter of putting ears and eyes on where they need to be.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Getting young folks off the incel pipeline is going to be really tough in today's environment.

Incel is the new fat. Most of society immediately treats them like scum that did it to themselves. In a lot of cases both fat people and incels are at fault, but trashing them isn't going to fix the issues.

Your need to understand them and how they got there to try and change them or at least reduce new ones from being created. Not just hate them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Can we start labeling opinion articles? It can be misleading

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

The time to stop this fascist talk before it became a problem was 69 years ago

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
787 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3526 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS