540
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 73 points 1 month ago

135° for anyone wondering.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

correct, just commenting the 100/80 intersection looks like 90/90, i think it was intentionally misleading, classic trying to get you problem

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Yes I originally thought 90 but then noticed the absence of a right angle sign. Also 60+40=100 which means the last angle should be 80. Making that perpendicular 100/80

[-] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 month ago

What a bunch of bullshit. Just draw it way off 90 if you don't want people to use a protractor. I calculated 125° because of this (but I'm happy I still got the right wrong answer, if that makes sense)

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

In my geometry classes, it's only 90 degrees if it's marked by a right angle marker. Otherwise, no matter how "right" it looks, if you assume before proving, it's on you.

[-] jdeath@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

this is a meme tho. i wanted to treat it like a "real life" problem where if i saw those obviously 90 degree corners, i would just say it's 90 because nowhere else in all my life outside of stupid schoolwork trick questions would that happen. which meant i got to the answer in a few seconds, which is a handy skill in real life.

[-] Glemek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You could potentially run into this or something very similar in cad when your sketches aren't fully defined yet. I've definitely ran into models that are slightly off square because someone missed a constraint much earlier in the timeline.

[-] 299792458ms@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its not bullshit, its conventions that make a lot more whole sense later on.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, simple doodle below for anyone wondering.

You start from left, and calculate them 1 by 1, based on the angles that you already know. It is quite simple actually, you just have to know they always add up to 180 (within triangle, and when you “split” the space over a straight line).

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago

you mean to say the right angles aren't right angles? disgusting, get this outta my sight

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

evil math teacher laughing in background

[-] spiffpitt@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

this diagram does not provide a right angle indicator, and thus should not be assumed as a right angle

[-] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

yes that's the stupid excuse my math teacher would give

[-] lugal@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago

For context: it used to be 675° a few years back so the math checks out.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

that's not how global warming works

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Nope. The value is "undefined". You don't have enough info to arrive at 135 - you are assuming that the bottom angle (sum of the angles that touch) is 180 degrees. Since there isn't a datum saying the bottom "line" is straight, nor does it say the triangle on the right is an isosceles triangle, it is impossible to solve.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

I don't see any indication that this is limited to the Euclidean plane either

[-] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Haha, I love this.

Also nothing indicates the numbers are Arabic numerals.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

You can't prove it's not hexadecimal.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

I think assuming 2 line segments which make up a larger straight line segment to be parallel is generally accepted practice, and that would trump the angles that are drawn inaccurately.

Of course, it'd be better to put a hash through them both to indicate they're parallel, especially given the deceptively drawn most-likely-not-a-right-angle.

I got 125.

180-(90-35)=x 180-55=x 125=x

[-] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You're assuming it is a right angle

Nothing states that it is

[-] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oh shit you're right. The left triangles unmarked angle is 80, meaning the right triangles internal angles are 100, 35, and 45. This means X is 135

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Even if it was a right angle, I think a second assumption is that the top left and bottom lines are equal length, which is also not stated.

I think there's just not enough information in this picture to calculate the angle, and it can only be determined by measuring. But the image also does not specify that it is drawn to scale.

[-] erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

It isn't 90 degrees because the image is misleading. 60+40+y=180. y=80

[-] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 1 month ago

I hated pictures like this in school. The numbers are just slapped on an inaccurate image and somehow they expect people to ignore the obvious right triangles and just focus on the math part of it.

[-] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago

Fun fact: In Turkey's university admittance exam, all angles have to be absolutely accurate, and measurements have to be scaled down perfectly to the visible shape in a geometry question.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

all angles have to be absolutely accurate

To what tolerance, though? Writing math exams has now become an engineering problem.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

If it was to scale you could just use a protractor and skip the whole math part, which is the entire part of the lesson…

[-] Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

I don't see that as a downside as long as these two questions are also included.

How many degrees make up the inner angles of a triangle?

How many degrees make up one side of a straight line?

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Big assumption that the bottom line is straight / not two lines connecting at a different angle

[-] elxeno@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Then they could use decimals so it's unlikely to get it right without calculating, 60.17°, 40.29°, 35.43°

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And what’s wrong with that. Utilizing real world solutions to problems is a life skill. Not some obscure formula that you will forget anyway.

[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

Adding and subtracting is a real life solution. Not sure how that is "obscure"

[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

You are being obtuse. You know what I mean by obscure.

[-] Glemek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Its intended to focus on a specific skill, the other skill can be valid and not be the point of the lesson.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

If the student eventually does geometry for money, they'll discover that customer CAD files invariably have some bizarre error like this.

[-] nul9o9@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I was scared I forgot basic trig stuff.

[-] wieson@feddit.org 20 points 1 month ago

It's even easier than going the triangle route.

A four-corner shape always has 360° internally.

So the internal angle of corner X is 360-(60+40+35).

The exterior angle therefore is 360-360-(60+40+35) = 60+40+35 = 135

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

That's based on the assumption that the two angles in the middle add up to 180, which can't be assumed by inspection alone as demonstrated by the visibly square 80° angle

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

No, you should completely ignore the bottom half of the center line. You end up with a shape with four turns. Those four internal angles always add to 360.

[-] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

He is saying your shape might have 5 turns instead of 4 if the bottom line is not actually a line. Though if that was the case, the problem would not be solvable, so I doubt it.

[-] anonymouse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Nice one, forgot this was an option too. You are missing a set of brackets though ;)

[-] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I love that every comment focus on the math puzzle. Since the other stuff is clearly uninteresting.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
540 points (97.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26753 readers
3891 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS