98
submitted 2 weeks ago by StrawberryPigtails to c/news@lemmy.world
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 weeks ago

US farmers forget that Donnie fucked them last time around, too. Idiots.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Didn’t we then pay them subsidies after trump screwed them?

Wasteful.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago

Right out of the authoritarian playbook - be both the cause and solution to problems that people face. That way you can vilify "them" while also being the "savior".

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Boo fucking hoo. Stop voting for policies that directly hurt you and yours just to spite perceived threats, and then maybe I'll give a shit about your woes.

-- an "enemy from within"

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

People think of farmers as something Grant Wood would paint. It's not like that as much anymore. Big corporations control those guys.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah as soon as I started seeing signs in fields advertising the big corporation seeds that were used I knew something was up.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

They will just blame any and all negative repercussions on liberals and immigrants, continuing to vote in people who destroy their lives.

[-] root_beer@midwest.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Someday there won’t be any of those scapegoats left to blame but it’ll be too goddamn late. Pardon me if I don’t shed any tears over their desperation.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 weeks ago

And agricultural products would also be the obvious place for the EU to retaliate too, so if Trump goes ahead with his harebrained plan to impose ridiculous tariffs they can forget about exports as a viable business model.

[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

And why use Chinese fertilizer, Trump is producing enough shit to provide all American farmers. Who needs fertilizer anyway.

[-] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Faces will be eaten, let the feasting commence

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

wait til your lord king, savior, and chief diaper-wearer shrinks your labor pool and those still around willing to work demand more money.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago

US exports are limited to war, Boeing, Caterpillar, Deere, agriculture and climate terrorist energy. The Trump promise of reindustrialization of US is a fake one. If universal tariff threat is followed through, certain recession. Placing them on the world, is not going to strengthen alliances.

Just because DNC/Biden/Harris rolled over for Trump doesn't mean rest of the world will. But that is the big geopolitical question.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The problem is that the US no longer has the production facilities and capabilities for so many basic things. How many screws are actually made in the US? How many electronic components, not just processors, but capacitors and resistors? All the ingredients for the chemical and pharmaceutical industry? They basically all come from China.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes. The CHIPS act making processors, will still send them over to Asia to make motherboards. Robotics in China is much more advanced because that is where all the customers are, and you need a lot of hands on tinkering help from manufacturer to get them to work with other processes. Boston Dynamics may be smartest in the world, but they are just making warehouse robots, and I doubt their sales are high.

Trying to build the full industrial support structure for "highest tech" industries while tariffing all imports is just an extremely tough investment proposition.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

https://apnews.com/united-states-government-60b2acc81d394e01a78e428c48d53815

The Trump administration announced Tuesday it will provide $12 billion in emergency relief to ease the pain of American farmers slammed by President Donald Trump’s escalating trade disputes with China and other countries.

However, some farm-state Republicans quickly dismissed the plan, declaring that farmers want markets for their crops, not payoffs for lost sales and lower prices.

Looking forward to experiencing Groundhog's Day about leopards eating faces next year when I visit home in the rural Midwest.

[-] credo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

It’s because they were probably educated in the US.

[-] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck em, let their crops wither and die.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Or not? I'd rather not children starve to death because farmers made stupid choices.

[-] HK65@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh, they will not wither and die, it will just be bought by Nestlé et al. and you can either import food from abroad and pay the Trump tax, or you can buy the price gouged local produce after all competition is gone.

Fuck US politics in general.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

US citizens with delicious faces, vote to let all of the face-eating leopards out of cages - now facing uncertain future...

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

China likely to reciprocate against the tariffs, why? They only hurt us, and help them. Placing Tariffs in the other direction makes their prices rise in their country, that doesn't help them. They keep more industries by keeping prices low

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

It hurts them because imports will fall and that's how they make money.

It will just hurt Americans far more.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I suppose if the product in unnecessary, that would make sense. Required imports would stay selling at same prices until manufacturing plants elsewhere could be built for cheap enough to not just pay the tariffs. : /

Nothing except market manipulation

[-] hyperreal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It does help them if they think retaliation will pressure the initial levier (the U.S.) to scale back their tariff schedule. It hasn't worked out like that but that's the theory. Also, China isn't as subject to popular pressure as western democracies. Yes, I agree with you, trade wars are wasteful, harmful, and just a bad idea overall.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

China just usually buys its agriculture from friendlier countries without making a big fuss about "making China great again" public display. It does occasionally issue explicit bans against countries acting stupid, though. Brazil certainly feels confident to plant much more.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago

They did in 2018. Turns out they import lots of soybean and other foods from the US.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Someone used to tell me one of the largest exports of Panama City Beach when I lived there was mulch. They would ship it to China for fuel apparently. Never would have thought about a smaller town shipping trees half a world away... Talk about inefficient.

[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Wait till you hear about the farming that happens in Phoenix and then shipped to China.

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fruit and vegetable producers that rely on migrant labor are going to be double fucked.

[-] FlavoredButtHair@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck China.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
98 points (98.0% liked)

News

23409 readers
3188 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS