492
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 204 points 2 weeks ago

"Somebody shit in my pants."

[-] SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee 38 points 2 weeks ago

"I don't know who it was but they must really like corn."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 163 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 132 points 2 weeks ago

The article claims "in droves" then doesn't give a number, or even an estimate.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 96 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, because google is vague.

Not sure what "100" means, but that's what it peaked at.

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 55 points 2 weeks ago

That is a percentage score. So you take the highest level of searches and it will always be 100% and all lesser scores are in comparison to that score of 100(%). If you can find out what the actual number of searches are for that one score, you can derive the approximate number of searches in the other places. It shows an informational tool tip on desktop.

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago

Well that's less than entirely helpful.

Thank you very much for the explanation!

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago

Your welcome... I liked it when it was Google Zeitgeist and they published hard numbers but since they rebranded and named their video series Google Zeitgeist good luck finding out the actual numbers 🤐

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago

Here are a couple comparisons that maybe give it more relevance:

Image

Image

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago

Of course its fucking IOWA

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 34 points 2 weeks ago

But droves though. Droves.

[-] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago

It could have been droves... it also could have been 10 people. It also doesn't say which way they wanted to change their vote. It could all be LIV's who learned something they didn't know after voting early or it could have been people torn about their vote panicking and seeing if they could change their mind.

This doesn't tell you anything but people searched it and not how many.

load more comments (1 replies)

"How to unsink the Titanic"

[-] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 96 points 2 weeks ago

Bloody hell, this is the US version of Brexit... this world would be such a better place if people just did the bare minimum of reading into what they were actually voting for before they fucking voted!

Also, seeing the other top searches being about the tariffs would have me creasing if it weren't so disappointingly stupid that these peoole seemingly knew nothing about Trumps most advertised economic policy before (assumably) voting for him

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Whenever I see all the trash on the side of the road, I know why the world is that way.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 81 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

i fucking called it.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13331955

turns out the answer to my question is “less than a week”

[-] Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago
[-] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Come on, Russian money wasn’t involved in ..

Oh

OHH

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 64 points 2 weeks ago

How are people this stupid?something in the water?

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 55 points 2 weeks ago
[-] karashta@piefed.social 22 points 2 weeks ago

Don't forget pesticide exposure which eventually has similar effects to lead over time: decreased intelligence and increased aggression

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 32 points 2 weeks ago

Some 'murican cities are unironically trying to get rid of fluoride from water. You know, the thing that also goes in toothpaste and is overall good for keeping teeth healthy

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 19 points 2 weeks ago

RFK Jr, who is likely to be our new head of health and human services, wants to ban it nationally.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Saleh@feddit.org 61 points 2 weeks ago

The relative numbers are worth little without knowing the underlying numbers. If it went from 100 to 700 people, that is still negligble. Also crazy how people immediately take that as a base to remove voters rights unless they pass some sort of test. Nothing could go wrong with stripping voters rights amirite?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 weeks ago

For all future elections I suggest we have one voter - me. I promise to deliver the optimally democratic outcome.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Ah, the Vetinari principle. One man, one vote.

Vetinari is that man, and he has that vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago

I wonder how many of these people are just now realizing that they have immediate family and friends who won’t be here next Christmas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 44 points 2 weeks ago

God I fucking hate humans

[-] pickman_model@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 weeks ago

Considering all of the shocking things Trump promised to do once he was elected, people are re-evaluating what they have gotten themselves into.

Sigh...

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 38 points 2 weeks ago

The republican anti-education campaign bears fruit I see.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago

You broke it, you bought it.

[-] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah except we're all going to pay.

[-] Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

America even does socialism the worst

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 weeks ago
[-] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 35 points 2 weeks ago

I do not put it past Russia to troll us like this

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 35 points 2 weeks ago

Once again, these are the a validation headlines that create and support echo chambers. Honestly, what does it matter now?

We already know the regret is strong on this nation and will only get worse.

[-] SeattleRain@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

To own the libs, they sold their soul.

[-] CAVOK@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago

Is this the "Find out" stage then?

Actions have consequences. Sad people had to figure it out this way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MurderCapitalism@feddit.org 24 points 2 weeks ago

When you realize memes shouldn't have influence on your voting decision...

[-] frezik@midwest.social 23 points 2 weeks ago

Something is seriously wrong with civics education in this country. People in power have no incentive to fix it. At least naturalized citizens have to take a fairly stringent test.

[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago
[-] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What ya'll upset for now? The economy was so good under Trump! Didn't you want him to deport all those "poisonous" immigrants. He's your retribution. And, besides, it's not like Harris would have been any better, because they're the same anyway.

/s

[-] whithom@discuss.online 18 points 2 weeks ago

I love it. America’s last hope and people failed. Fuck this place. Let the civil war begin.

[-] Cuberoot@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

Are we all just assuming these searches are from people who regret their votes and hoped to be able to change it?

I double checked my ballot before submitting it, with full knowledge that irrevocability is the price of anonymity. Nevertheless, I might use similar search terms if I was curious how many other voters, possibly in other states or with different political alignments, had written about regretting their votes. Or, perhaps, ... if I was doing research for a post-election article about the topic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago

I don’t know how trustworthy these search trends are. For example if you type in “where did I put my” it will complete all kinds of stuff like “keys” and “wallet” and “passport” which seems to imply that people are regularly asking Google where they placed items in their own house.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

This is all bullshit, designed to start another wave of outrage. Even after the election, we've gotta have more stuff to rage about. News these days is just rage all day every day, no matter what.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
492 points (95.4% liked)

politics

19143 readers
2311 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS