824
Plasticccc (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 14 points 18 hours ago
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 20 points 23 hours ago

Oh I see, they mistaken thought the title was "No, MORE Plastic!"

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago

They're saying Boo-urns!

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

How did he pick out the publisher... Just whoever was offering the best deal?

[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The way publishing industry has been for a very long time, authors (especially first time ones) don't get to pick whoever pays the best deal. Just whoever pays the first.

Edit: Also, theoretically, publishers should accommodate author wishes once a publication contract has been made. Actually not unheard of that a publisher would do something cool for their up and coming star. But this? Sloppiness on the publisher's part, plain and simple.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

The author doesn't get to pick who can print his book? Or do you mean he has no real choice because he's got bills to pay?

[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago

Authors have to submit manuscripts to publishers individually (or, in some markets, agents who work with multiple publishers in the same niche).

Publishers get showered with manuscripts. Very small percentage of them are what publishers deem will meet market goals.

In standard publishing contracts, the author gets paid an advance. This is basically the royalty percentage for the entire first print run. It's not refundable. It represents the trust the publisher puts on the author, and if the publisher can't sell all copies, well, tough for them. (They'd probably just not work with that author again.)

Getting to that point is a pretty massive hurdle to clear for first time authors.

So no, authors don't really get to pick their publishers. The only scenario where people get to pick their publishers is some celebrity deal bullshit.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

Interesting! I'm curious if he addresses this lack of choices in his proposals for how to make a difference.

Maybe I'll just download it though.

[-] konju376@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago

From what you hear it's that they have bills to pay. If a publisher doesn't know your name, they're not going to assume it's an automatic best-seller so they're less likely to actually look at your work to see if it's worth it.

Also, to pay your bills before the publisher actually prints the book, you have to find one way ahead of you finishing the book, meaning that you have to send them an unfinished manuscript, further hurting your chances - but if they like it you get that money before it's done, with the caveat that they're gonna sue if you don't deliver.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

No. He's that one unique author who looked for the worst deal for his work.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago

Or terms he finds acceptable

[-] spongeborgcubepants@lemmy.world 180 points 2 days ago

It was a typo, he meant: No, more plastic!

[-] Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago

Lionel Hutz, Esq

Free consolation? No, money down!

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Better get rid of this bar association sticker too.

I don't understand why some books are wrapped in plastic at all. Like is it to protect the cover? Prevent people from reading it at the book store? Some weird contract with a vendor that requires a percentage of books be wrapped? A quirk of the shop that printed the book?

It makes zero sense.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 71 points 1 day ago

Probably so they can be stored carelessly in dirty warehouses that may or may not control for humidity

[-] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 20 hours ago

Probably also in case the shipping container leaks or has some termites or something?

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Used to work in a warehouse that did exactly this, can confirm drove a forklift loading pallets of books on trucks and “humidity control” meant closing the bay doors that didn’t have trailers backed in so the snow wouldn’t blow inside.

Aren't books shipped in boxes though? I guess maybe a printer might palletize the books and find it cheaper to not wrap the whole pallet?

It still seems like the individual book is the wrong place to focus on protecting it from damage it might incur in transit.

[-] sibannac@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

When it's wrapped in plastic it can be individually picked. In a warehouse large quantities of stuff is stored away in bulk, sometimes palletized. A picker goes around and picks out the items from the larger bulk of items to put together a shipping order. If they were individually wrapped, whether by the warehouse or their distributor, it is for general protection(so that it feels new) and ease of handling.

Source: worked many of the lower positions at different warehouses for some years.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

They are shipped on shrink wrapped pallets in boxes. The thing is, your local Walmart/target/airport shop doesn’t need 1500 copies of the latest Patterson novel, they stock a few of each current book in store. Meaning that pallet gets opened up at a hub warehouse and 2-3 books are going to 2-300 different stores along with whatever else has been purchased that week to restock the shelf. That book passes though a lot of hands before you buy it at the register

[-] Chev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Both is correct. But the second one is less about reading and more about making a crease. People who buy new books, want to be the first ones to read it. If they wouldn't care, they would just go to the library.

[-] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Them: *lists 4 options*

You: "Both"

[-] Hupf@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago

What do you mean? Of course I can count to two!

[-] ChillPill@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

That's a typo, it should read: "No. More plastic!"

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I shouldn't have this ALA logo here either

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 52 points 2 days ago

He’s right about sleepwalking into oblivion

[-] db2@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Plot twist: it was corn starch based.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 63 points 2 days ago

that's still bad though. it requires petroleum based processes to grow the corn and then convert the starch into a plastic like substance when the book could have just not been shrink wrapped. i get that you're joking, and i'm being pedantic, but not enough people realize bioplastics are not the solution, they're a gap measure, like EVs, and i'm usingeyour comment as a soapbox

[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Bioplastics also cause contaminated petroplastic recycling batches, are difficult to compost (my city, like many cities, does not have the facility), and release methane when breaking down in a landfill.

[-] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What’s up with cities (in the US) not having the facilities for this? I know it’s not a perfect solution but everyone I see walking their dog in Los Angeles has these compostable bags.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but it sounds like Europe does (generally speaking). Is it a matter of laziness or something else on our part?

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

building these facilities must be funded by levies, and most jurisdictions vote no on most levies because no one ever feels like they can afford more taxes. really, if the world worked correctly, the richest people and companies would just pay for these things because society benefits them more than the rest of us, and we should receive benefits from society

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I guess they could have been wrapped in bulk, but I wouldn't say you can ship books around without any protection.

It could have been an e book though

[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago

A paper band is pretty good at protecting a book in transit.

[-] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago

My e-reader is e-waste.

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What about cellophane?

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 2 days ago

Plasticccc

Aye, but it’s based on a real treasure chest!

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee -2 points 1 day ago

No. More. Plasticccc? Whelp, there goes my new hip and wheel chair and pain here I come!

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 6 points 21 hours ago

I dunno, friend. Maybe the title doesn't contain the entire contents of the book.

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 0 points 2 hours ago

The title most certainly doesn't contain the whole book. But it does contain the whole belief of the author.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 2 points 19 hours ago

Somehow I doubt hips and wheelchairs are among the top offenders

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

Well, stop and think about all those plastic medical devices that get used. Everything from syringes to hips, to air tubing, to the packaging of sterilized surgical instruments. That's a metric carp tonne of plastics. There are a LOT of life threat level safety devices that use plastics also.

We probably don't need to bottle soda pop or water in plastic bottles, but the use of plastics will never go away.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Transparent paper just doesnt have the same luminosity

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
824 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26838 readers
5446 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS