463
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/reddit@lemmy.world

The drama:

Some indian company made a "Anonymous survey" asking about a employee's stress level.

Then they fired all employees who had a certain rating, even though it was "anonymous".

The news article: https://m.economictimes.com/news/new-updates/startup-asks-employees-if-they-are-stressed-and-then-fires-them-leaked-letter-goes-viral/articleshow/116129662.cms

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 80 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The linked article says they could not confirm the genuineness of the email. Is there any confirmation that this is real? I did a bit of searching and several Indian sites are reporting on it, but they all seem to be reporting about the outrageous email going viral, not checking the source.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 83 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I started collecting all the times it happened but gave up after 3 of them.

[-] logos@sh.itjust.works 45 points 6 days ago

The only legitimate reason I can think of is that it’s viral marketing. I think they might be on to something.

[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 33 points 6 days ago

Makes the company appear deranged.

Who are they appealing to

[-] andyburke@fedia.io 40 points 6 days ago
[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 6 days ago

You are indeed correct.

If only there was a man with a particular adjustment skills...

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

They caught him :(. It’s objectively hilarious that his name is Luigi though.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz -2 points 6 days ago

Nah, Luigi is innocent. Luigi was having a pint at drag's house at the time of the assassination.

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I think name recognition is good no matter what in their eyes. Many companies don't care about bad PR.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 23 points 6 days ago

Interesting because most of the Reddit front page is viral marketing nowadays.

[-] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

The rules only cover viral marketing when they're not already paying off reddit.

[-] logos@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

That's a good point

[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 6 days ago

Who is viral marketing the adjuster hehe

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 46 points 6 days ago

WTF does reddit suffer from leaving this story up?

[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 81 points 6 days ago

Corporate owners don't like the anti capitalist sentiment

Also "racism"

[-] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 30 points 6 days ago

I got permabanned on there for saying child abusers should get beaten the same way they beat kids. The reason given for the ban was "promotes violence", I appealed the ban and their response was "we don't want people promoting child abuse, do not contact us anymore". I don't know if some admin was having a bad day or just illiterate but there are some power tripping mods and admins on there that will ban and remove for literally no good reason. The fact that they accused me of promoting child abuse when I was saying the complete opposite was pure trolling.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Maybe they think a child abuser who has just received a beating is more likely, not less likely, to go on and abuse children.

Think about it: do you really think a man who beats his children is gonna be a better dad after he gets beaten up?

Violence is a complex subject, and people’s instinct to solve problems with beating up people they’re frustrated with is a curse of humanity, no matter how obvious a solution it may seem in the moment.

Some people, lots of people actually, and with good reason, think that violence begets violence.

[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 15 points 6 days ago

Mods are like Catholic clergy... It attracts certain types...

I am always amazed at how Trump voter gets less sympathy than pedophiles on neo lib modded socials. That's the only calls to violence they will accept but god forbid we get a wood chipper going for a known pedo

ToS vIolaTioN

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org -1 points 6 days ago

So is Bill cliton and some prince andrew UK and Chomsky and dershevitz

Bill gates too

What's your point...

Diddy, Jay z

R Kelly

We are ruled and entertained by pedos

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

!yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[-] Heisenburner@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I got banned from the Ontario subreddit for "promoting violence" for saying that I couldn't wait to piss on Doug Ford's grave

[-] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Maybe it's taken down on the basis it's a private email including multiple identifiable names and doxs those involved.

Even the to field is visible with multiple identifiable.

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 19 points 6 days ago

Seems very much not real. :)

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 15 points 6 days ago

Neither the email nor your article indicates that the survey was anonymous.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Why is this downvoted? If it's true it's a valid criticism, and if it's false, I couldn't find a mention of anonymity either.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 days ago

because it's not valid criticism. no one is complaining about the context of the survey it's about Reddit suppressing a story on the whims of corporate moderators.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago

Same thing happened here. People here don't seem to be actually interested in the truth, or sources. They just want to feed their confirmation bias to feel better about themselves.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

Reddit ahh mental gymnastics

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

They just meant anonymous in the sense that they wouldn't publish the results on Facebook.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 6 days ago

An excellent reminder that "confidential" means "We won't tell anyone else what you said but can still use it against you."

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Is it just because the company is named?

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

seems plausible it could be a legal concern about being sued for defamation

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I suppose, althought the story is out there, and redacting the company name would be like a bandaid on a dead guy.

[-] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
[-] Alice@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 6 days ago
[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

r/India is a propaganda sub and you are not allowed to post anything that even remotely criticizes the government or points out social issues because it's against their subreddit rules. You may only post praise and admiration. You are also allowed, or welcomed rather, to shit on any other country.

[-] ultranaut@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

Modi has a troll army, you can find them all over the internet. They are a lot like the MAGA cultists.

[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org -5 points 6 days ago

Hindu nationalist are indeed brain dead clowns...

But you ain't got to reach for Maga when we got neo lib acolytes right on Lemmy constantly moderating "wrong" think.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 days ago

It's still an apt description, so I am confused about the point you are trying to make.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 points 6 days ago

He's trying to bash his adversaries here by bringing it up on an unrelated post.

[-] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org -2 points 6 days ago

We got this behavior on fedi and it ain't maga

[-] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Have you even seen r/india? It's the inverse of what you have written. Criticising the govt is the rule there, in fact, there was a whole subreddit called r/indiadiscussion originally dedicated for meta linking of why people got banned from r/india. (r/indiadiscussion isn't meta only anymore but if one trawls through the old posts, assuming they aren't deleted, one can see the breadth of bans from r/india)

It's r/indiaspeaks that was originally formed as a free speech bastion that turned rightwing because the main sub was staunchly on the opposite side of the spectrum(and loved to use the banhammer).

I don't think I can link usernames here but a notorious powermod of r/india used to moderate r/worldnews as well and banning from once meant ban from the other.

[-] monke@lemmy.cafe 2 points 6 days ago

This is simply false. Yes, r/India is a propaganda sub but it's very much anti-modi and people criticize the government all the time. r/indispeaks is very much pro-modi. I avoid both these subreddits.

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
463 points (97.1% liked)

Reddit

17779 readers
152 users here now

News and Discussions about Reddit

Welcome to !reddit. This is a community for all news and discussions about Reddit.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


Rule 1- No brigading.

**You may not encourage brigading any communities or subreddits in any way. **

YSKs are about self-improvement on how to do things.



Rule 2- No illegal or NSFW or gore content.

**No illegal or NSFW or gore content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-Reddit posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



:::spoiler Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS