What's your opinion about Luigi Mangione? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by SolarPunker@slrpnk.net to c/anarchism@lemmy.ml

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare since 2021, was shot and killed outside an entrance to the New York Hilton Midtown in Manhattan, New York City, on December 4, 2024. He was in the city to attend an annual investors meeting for UnitedHealth Group, the parent company of UnitedHealthcare. Authorities believe the attack was not random. Thompson had been criticized for UnitedHealthcare's rejection of insurance claims, and his family reported that he had received death threats in the past. The shooting occurred early in the morning, and the suspect, initially described as a white man wearing a mask, fled the scene."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Brian_Thompson

(edit) I would like to point out that Luigi Mangione is only a suspect and there are currently doubts about the integrity of the evidence.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Zectivi@sh.itjust.works 47 points 4 days ago

I’ll be honest, I’m ok with what happened. Someone at work gave me shit over “oh but he has 2 kids …”

Murder in the general sense is not ok. People shouldn’t be able to end the lives of other people just because without response. But this guy... How many lives did he decide to end so he can get a little bigger of a paycheck?

The kids? Yeah, as a parent, I have sympathy. But as a human, fuck that shit.

[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago

If a drug dealer who had 2 kids sold fentanyl laced drugs that killed several people just to make some money got murdered in the streets nobody would say "oh but he has 2 kids".

They might say the drug dealer was doing something illegal. How this CEO was running things should be illegal. Countless (innocent) people died so he could get more money.

Oh also he was doing illegal things including insider trading and drinking and driving so there's that.

[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah.

Honestly I see Brian Thompson as way worse than this hypothetical drug dealer.

Obviously, the drug dealer is bad: he's effectively killed people by selling fentanylaced drugs (presumably without telling his buyers what they were actually buying). But Brian has effectively killed thousands.

In both cases I have sympathy for the kids. In the drug dealers case, I might not be crying my eyes out about the death; but I still wish some form of non-lethal recourse had been taken. This person's death doesn't send a very effective message, as most other people in his position have already accepted the risk inherent to what they're doing.

In Brian's case, non-lethal recourse wouldn't have been effective. If he was left alive he would've just kept killing people for his own profit, but his death sends a message to others in his position. People who usually wouldn't see any sort of consequences for their actions.

[-] hank_the_tank66@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

I feel bad for the family. Losing a loved one sucks. I don't know anything else about him, his family, or their life outside of this story to build an opinion on their suffering, but I'm sure it is immeasurable and only made worse by the media circus that has developed.

But one thing I do know is that this same terrible thing happens to so many families across the world every day. And the impacts can be harder than just dealing with the loss - what if the person murdered was the earner for the family? Or supported their disabled partner or child? What if a couple wasn't married/legally bound, so the partner can't get any of the deceased's benefits? Imagine having to try to figure out childcare if you were a stay at home parent and had to go back to work. Imagine having to go back to work period after suffering a loss like that?

This is where my lack of sympathy for the current situation manifests - because Mr. Thompson's family is ridiculously rich from his time as CEO of UHC, they will not have to worry about these scenarios. Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy safety and security and eliminate worry. They will be able to fully mourn their husband and father, knowing that their millions and millions of dollars are sitting there earning more money without them having to lift a finger. Their future is secure.

To become that rich you either profited off the efforts of others, or profited from the suffering of others. Or both.

[-] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I personally find it absurd that a murder involving a few people makes the world talk about these health problems much more effectively than street demonstrations of thousands of protesters. The real fact is that the protesters are us, here on the net, now much more impactful online than one on the street, and I don't know if this is worrying or not but this is the reality (at least in many contexts).

[-] MarxMadness@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 days ago

But this guy… How many lives did he decide to end so he can get a little bigger of a paycheck?

Another factor here is that not in a million years would Brian Thinpson face any measure of official justice for this. The government has completely given up on the idea that this sort of harm should be stopped, or its perpetrators held accountable.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 39 points 4 days ago

People like Brian Thompson enjoy(ed) a life of care free luxury and comfort because people have been abiding by societal norms...the social contract. Eventually, those care free days are going to be a distant memory and "corpos" are going to need armed security 24/7 like every cyberpunk novel ever has predicted.

There is one truth about Americans. You do not want them to agree that you are the baddie they should focus on.

[-] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 days ago

You reminded me of something by mentioning cyberpunk: if this case does not lead to an actual mass movement, it will probably accelerate in the opposite direction, of unlimited capitalist liberalism in which every CEO is a demigod with a private army for his personal defense. Which, as you well said, is narrated in every cyberpunk story but which is a symptom of its realization.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 days ago

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In case anyone is curious like I was, the original artist of this portrait of Mike Pondsmith - creator of the Cyberpunk TTRPG - is Lauren Tamaki, it was originally for The Atlantic article "The Role-Playing Game That Predicted The Future" written by Darryn King from December 2020, her other portraits are available here: http://laurentamaki.com/portrait-gallery

[-] CyLith@lemm.ee 29 points 4 days ago

I do not condone murder. But this was not a murder, this was an assassination, and we need more of that.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

More random assassinations by lone wolves will yield more state brutality, more cop cities and expanded security state powers.

(In case anyone thinks I’m speaking from a liberal position…)

https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Adventurism

[-] entropicdrift 7 points 4 days ago

This. This may be a moment where American class consciousness has flickered to life, but without theory and organized movements nothing will come of it besides crackdowns.

[-] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

More random assassinations by lone wolves will yield more state brutality, more cop cities and expanded security state powers.

It was not random, it was clearly targeted.

Cop cities, state brutality and expanding state powers are already the realitiy in the US.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago

By random I mean it is not organized. It is random people doing their own thing.

[-] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

Sounds like anarchism to me

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

At this stage though I can't really condemn it, I've seen class consciousness only evaporate more and more over the course of my lifetime across the general populus, while concentrating in a few unions, which isn't bad of course as it gets workers better material conditions, but it's a far cry from a revolutionary movement. At this stage I feel all that's left is individual actions, though perhaps I'm dooming.

I think prolewiki is a bit overly critical there, nobody thinks tagging a wall like some teenager is going to spread class consciousness enough to lead to anything, though a good art piece or slogan may make people stop and think, we'd be overwhelmingly closer to any kind of lefty utopia if the guy shooting trump didn't miss.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

we’d be overwhelmingly closer to any kind of lefty utopia if the guy shooting trump didn’t miss.

I don’t see how. He’d just be replaced by Vance or some other clown. Trump isn’t some unique villain, his rise is a product of late-stage neoliberalism. Fascism isn’t on the rise all over the Western world for no reason, it’s because of grinding neoliberalism throughout the imperial core.

[-] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Bruh I know what the imperial core is.

Yes trump would be replaced, that much is obvious as there is a league of even shadier mfers behind him, but whether his replacement would have the charisma to actually succeed in getting enough people energised to suceed is a different question entirely.

Yes there is a global rise in the far-right and yes it is in large part due to the decay of brief prosperity for the imperial core countries due to the failure of neoliberal policies, in many ways failure that is created by inherent contradictions within capitalism as described by Marx, but this rise is also tied together by strong charismatic leaders who are able to seize the moment in ways the left can't counter because we cannot offer the simplicity of lies.

So to avoid the pendulum swinging to the right, keeping those individuals out of power is our only option and is a shared want between us and the establishment.

I see no reason not to seize the opportunity and utilize electoralism to our advantage, even in the absence of meaningful change, a rightoid passing legislation means a press environment even worse than typical neoliberal press, and that makes it that much harder to organise, to do mutual aid, talk about theory or spread solidarity.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

It's immoral to be more mad about Brian Thompson's death than about the countless millions he killed and tortured and bankrupted with his pen.

The killer is a symptom, not of Brian Thompson but of the system he was a replaceable figurehead for. If we have less violent means of stopping insurance executives murdering millions, we should jump at them. Can't let millions die like that though. Do anything else.

Even making the discussion about Luigi is a little misleading in the wider sense, although it's not invalid by default to discuss it.

[-] kata_ton_daimona@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago

A cold (maybe rational?) thought: some assassinations are milestones of time; this could be one.

From my point of view: we could feel bad thinking was a "good" assassination, but we've also to think about all the people murdered by UnitedHealth. For the average media is simple to manipulate narration, even without saying the false: he had children, he had a family; we could say the same about many officials of the German Army in WWII, they had families too.

Thompson's sons are not assassin's victims, they are victim of the system. Also Thompson himself could maybe seen as a collateral victim.

I'm waiting to have more information about the assassin to formulate a thought about him (could be a big misinformation about), my comment is about the fact in general.

[-] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

he had children, he had a family; we could say the same about many officials of the German Army in WWII, they had families too.

He had been living separately from his family for some time. He had a DUI conviction. On the same day that the company suffered a ransomeware attack that wiped $46B from it's market cap, he dumped $1.5M of his stock and along with others, was being investigated.

The media has obviously done a whitewash of the guy, as it's in their class interests but to call him a piece of shit would be going lightly.

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 16 points 4 days ago

I'm surprised these replies in an anarchist comm haven't brought up concepts like Propaganda of the Deed already. (that said, I know for a fact some people responding aren't anarchists)

While I consider PotD of the 1890s-1900s to have failed in its intentions and is worth strongly critiquing, and while the crappy neo-Nazi imitation advocated by their popular text Siege has also been extremely ineffective, this assassination has provided an interesting case study - the killing of a healthcare CEO with no innocent bystanders is one of the least controversial extreme deeds yet. I've seen people even claiming this could become the new Columbine (we'll have to wait to see if that prediction is worth anything, but it would be nice to see the ruling class be shot up for a change).

[-] lukes26@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago

I think the biggest issues with the gilded age PotD was that a lot of them hurt innocent people, or had collateral damage which hurt everyone in the case of a lot of the bombings. Not all of them by any means, but when innocent bystanders got hurt or killed it made the deed a lot less supportable. Plus there's just something about a health insurance CEO that makes literally nobody like them lol.

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 days ago

The innocent people, and also some who the anarchists wouldn't consider innocent but a typical citizen might. Again, a parasitical CEO, no-one likes them but their squealing fellow upper-class. And this really had the effect of clarifying the economic classes - the booj and their megaphones yelled in unison that this was bad, while the worker class, regardless of any cultural "left"-"right" divide, overwhelmingly said "he got what he deserved".

[-] lukes26@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah, seeing people from both sides trashing politicians or influencers who spoke positively about Thompson or negitively of the killer has been so cool to see. There are still the liberals opposed go any type of visible violence that didn't like the murder, but even most of them didn't support the statements in support of Thomas. The Facebook post with like 100,000 laugh reactions has to be such a sign that no one is mourning a ceo and no one will care if you get killed. Like it's facebook, if you get that reaction on facebook you know it's bad lol. I know it won't lead to anything on its own, but I hope it makes them uncomfortable at the very least. It's long since time that the owner class feel a modicum of the pain they cause millions daily.

[-] comfy@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

I'm amazed they haven't deleted it:

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Honestly this is very clarifying and we should be jumping on this as a tool to further understanding of our cause. Not because the shooter was one of ours but because support for him is common ground we can use to talk to everyone who we want to talk to.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

I think, taking the leaked manifesto as legit here, the guy was aware of this. One of the lines basically says "it seems obvious we need to take matters into our own hands and I guess I have to be the first to do it".

That said, i think this works because it's not just propaganda of the deed. These masters of the world are still only human. They have manipulated the world so they get to decide what happens to who, when, and accept no input from anyone else. Well, when they use that power to cause millions of excess deaths it's no surprise their victims will (eventually, after much patience) simply step outside the social contract to deal with them.

[-] Manticore@beehaw.org 5 points 3 days ago

Curiosity, resigned frustration.

Whether it was him or not, whether evidence was real or not. If the goal was to spark a revolution, if it was to wake people up to their collective power, if it was to scare the elites...

This person took action because they were desperate for change. But he didn't reveal anything we didn't already feel, and most people are continuing to do what they've already been doing: making memes about their malcontent in their comfortable communities.

I imagine it must feel so disempowering to sacrifice the only thing you think you have left - your free life - in order to spark change, only to watch all those who approve still continue to do nothing at all.

I like that the solidarity in conversation has drawn more attention to class rather than affiliation, that the profitable infighting between Team A and Team B (Left/Right, urban/rural, etc) has temporarily cooled while Americans look upwards.

But if there is change, it's still a while away. The disenfranchised still have something to lose. They still think they can't matter, and the lack of meaningful change will continue to prove that to them. Complacent malcontent.

It must be so miserable, being manhandled and denigrated by law enforcement, mistreated and neglected by imprisonment, dehumanized by the self-righteous; and see that the 'movement' your last hurrah inspired was the internet's Meme Flavour of the Month. The sheer impotence of watching everybody laugh and keep waiting for somebody else to save them.

I can barely imagine how that must feel. To sacrifice everything and watch the world laugh.

[-] PegasusAssistant@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

We're less than two weeks out and I think the real legacy of this assassination isn't going to be seen immediately. If someone has been heavily influenced by the example that Luigi is setting, only an idiot would be posting about it online.

Just the very fact that people are praising this action is going to be the green light for some people. I'm not surprised that most people aren't taking to the streets en mass, but I don't think people are going to forget this moment either.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 19 points 4 days ago

I feel SO BAD for that CEOS kids! And ZERO Sympathy for the Tens of Thousands of Parents and Kids who he Killed through his Denial of Healthcare Coverage!

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

Luigi did nothing wrong

[-] PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Mario did it, it’s easy to confuse them

[-] 1984@lemmy.today 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think it sends an important signal that when people are pushed too far by the greedy capitalists, this may happen.

I read about him and I understand what he was feeling. He is not a evil person.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

Why are you asking about opinions of Luigi Mangione and not the assassin? Are you really taking the police's word for it that they're the same person?

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Probably because even the media outlets are failing to use words like "suspected" or "allegedly".

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

He didn't do it, but if he were Muad'dib, he'd be a hero and not guilty of any crime, because self defence is legal.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think your question comes with the assumption that authorities are correct in pinning this on Mangione, but I make no such assumption. I know almost nothing about him, and I’m not interested in learning any more. I don’t have an opinion about him and don’t care to form one, because I don’t care about some random guy who might not even be the guy.

I’m more interested in the invisible hand’s culpability in the slaughter of millions. This media spectacle is starting to go off the rails, distracting from the real prime suspect. The media would rather we focus on the sizzle of a whodunit/whydunit than on the worst healthcare system in the imperial core, or on capitalism in general.

[-] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I actually took the killer for granted since it seems like a fact online now, furthermore the resemblance is remarkable and, if we stick to the police, it seems he was found with a loader and a manifesto.

I completely agree with paying attention to the mud machine, the first thing they will do is distract public attention on trivialities such as the personal lives of the protagonists, promptly hiding the social problem.

[-] zante@slrpnk.net 13 points 4 days ago

Rational and courageous.

[-] thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago

Don't really respond you these types of things. But for someone with cptsd with a shit ton of people in my past who manipulated me, gaslighting me, abused me and lied to me. I became very good at knowing if someone is lying to me and manipulating me. Also my autism has my pattern recognition extremely high and know people very well very fast and with high degree of accuracy, with even just a few genuine pictures of themselves.

But this guy. He seems. Off. His pictures, his "manifesto" all of it. Seems like a abusive person trying to gaslight me and manipulate me into thinking "yeah! This guy did it! Look at the evidence".

From my experience in my life. This doesn't seem right, things don't add up correctly. I don't know if he did it or not but from that picture of the assassin, the person is extremely generic and could be a lot of people.

As always, question all information about it. Don't believe everything you read on the news as they are pretty much a propaganda machine, oh hell don't believe any social Media or anybody really. Fucking propaganda is so imbedded in this fucking country that it's hard to tell who's doing it because they want to Truth or want followers or just spreading misinformation.

[-] hamid@vegantheoryclub.org 5 points 3 days ago

I think he is being framed by the cops who are unable or unwilling to find the actual killer

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 11 points 4 days ago

Doesn't seem likely he's guilty to me. The police claim to have found him half a state away, with all the evidence on him? Lol

[-] dRLY@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

If it was or wasn't him (and was someone else), it doesn't change that the action (or PotD) was the correct move imo. "Correct" forms of protests and legal actions only work so much in a system rigged against the working class. But the "peaceful" options never work against the rich/corporations. So I kind of hope more CEOs in all industries meet the same punishment for all lives that they have played with. Even if we are shown that dude hates leftists, doesn't change my critical support of his (or whomever it was if not him) action. But it will be very important for leftist orgs/groups/collectives to start going hard for waking up the masses while there is such a good point of unity to work from.

[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

He's the face of a shithead corpo and had responsibility to make shithead decisions for shareholders where he indirectly caused deaths of thousands.

It's a vigilante move where Luigi is the hero. He should go through the justice system with a gofundme team of lawyers.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024

64 points (95.7% liked)

Anarchism

3456 readers

1 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules:

Be respectful
Don't be a nazi
Argue about the point and not the person
This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.