54
submitted 6 hours ago by BigLenin@hexbear.net to c/slop@hexbear.net

Context:

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 28 points 4 hours ago

Liberals larping as revolutionaries will never stop being funny

[-] Real_User@hexbear.net 26 points 4 hours ago

They wanna hold onto that "firebomb a Walmart" tweet so bad

[-] 51dz31@hexbear.net 17 points 4 hours ago

I think contrapoints is ok for "radicalizing" liberals a bit, but she is a liberal deep down and a shill for Obama and Hillary Clinton

[-] BigLenin@hexbear.net 27 points 3 hours ago

I think contrapoints is ok for "radicalizing" liberals a bit

I disagree. All her fans just seem to stay Libs, now they're just more articulate and aesthetically creative Libs which makes them more annoying.

[-] 51dz31@hexbear.net 20 points 3 hours ago

From my experience, when I was a "baby leftist" aka anti "tankie" lib, what got me into reading was "watching" some of her videos. Later, when I got more knowlegable I started to absolutely despise her and hate her "politics".

But if she has a parasocial relationship with her fans, similar to the one Vaush has then I agree, maybe I just didn't take all of her words for granted like her viewers do

[-] GrosMichel@hexbear.net 18 points 3 hours ago

I'd say the people who've stuck around to support her are liberals. It's possible she did radicalize a bunch of people and they're some of the ones dunking on her.

[-] BigLenin@hexbear.net 12 points 3 hours ago

It's possible she did radicalize a bunch of people and they're some of the ones dunking on her.

I think a lot of those people were headed that way anyway, and without contra they would have ended up here regardless. If anything she delayed their evolution.

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 6 points 2 hours ago

She was pretty good in 2017-2018 (up until the truscum/enbyphobic stuff), but once she started spiraling, god damn.

I remember her having some real influence when she was doing her videos about incels and 4chan and such. She (understandably) didn't want to be the trans "incel-whisperer" and moved on to making whatever it is she makes now.

I definitely got a few people interested in her videos in 2019 or so who were encountering the idea of socialism for the first time. Don't know if they continued beyond her stuff as I don't work with them anymore.

[-] miz@hexbear.net 33 points 5 hours ago

Natalie's theory of change is having meetings with Hillary Clinton

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 47 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

First off, when has a liberal ever done anything. Second, if an action is leftist it ceases to be right-wing.

Killing CEOs is a leftist act that empowered leftist discussion about healthcare.

[-] JayTreeman@hexbear.net 19 points 5 hours ago

And why are we supposed to throw away this leftist act because the perpetrator may have had questionable takes? Nobody's perfect, and people change. Some of the decisions made here make me question if this place is a psyop

[-] M68040@hexbear.net 4 points 1 hour ago

I kind of regard the situation as a “critical support” sort of thing. These sorts of “dubious person does something good” situations are generally where the concept is applied, aren’t they?

[-] Kuori@hexbear.net 43 points 4 hours ago

no one is asking for that. they're just asking people to stop inventing a redemption arc for this dude so they can justify riding him into the sunset

he did something cool. that's all. treating him as a hero is goofy shit

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 17 points 4 hours ago

And even if he did have questionable takes, we can't even be sure the guy was even the real shooter and not just a patsy

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@hexbear.net 15 points 3 hours ago

I'm combining conspiracies: unidentified drones in Jersey are searching for the real adjustor

[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 27 points 5 hours ago

I just treat it like this:

action is as leftist as whacking ex-PM Abe

person is as rightist as Ted K. until he proves himself recently otherwise

[-] this_dude_eating_beans@hexbear.net 17 points 4 hours ago

because you're doing a tailsism when you should be doing a sonicism or something idk i block anyone that tells me to read

[-] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 6 points 2 hours ago

When in fact, it was a Luigi-ism. Meanwhile, the TurboGrafx 16 is left in shambles because Bonk's Adventure was single-player only, so he didn't have a sidekick after which we could name an -ism to describe current and not-so-current events involving based actions and cringe ideologies. Good job, Atlus.

[-] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 23 minutes ago

Can't wait until some CEOs get Geno Beam'd

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
54 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

208 readers
619 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS