273
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 31 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

A 74-year-old who is dying of cancer was chosen over a 35-year-old rising star at the insistence of an 84-year-old woman (who is currently undergoing hip replacement surgery) just months after an 81-year-old Presidential candidate was forced to drop out of the race because he showed sever symptoms of cognitive decline during a debate. If this were a satire about a gerontocracy, I would think it was too over the top.

[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Unfortunate, but it'll give her more time to work with Bernie and labor leaders to organize a general strike

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 18 points 15 hours ago

Gerry Connolly more like Gerry Atric.

If AOC sticks with the Democratic party instead of going independent she proves the DNC was right to deny her power. Why bother caving to AOC'S demands if she will keep sheepdogging people to the party and get nothing in return?

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 57 points 18 hours ago

"Everyone sort of made the case that they would be the best to help change the message across the country. ... He's a very good communicator," said Beyer.

Oh yeah that's exactly what's going to fix the problem Democrats have. Electing another old ass Clinton era Democrat to a position of power. It's not like everybody's pissed at them for losing the Presidency, the House, and the Senate all in one go.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

See it from their perspective. They are doing their hardest to be as useless as possible and people still vote them.

At this point, how pissed everyone is matters jack shit because they know their public loves outrage for the sake of outrage, and the very same public that votes them, is totally neutered and incapable of choosing or voting for anything else

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

They are using the fact that people can't go anywhere else and are weaponising that to do absolutely nothing.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago

It’s not like everybody’s pissed at them for losing the Presidency, the House, and the Senate all in one go.

With their amazing communication skills.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 hours ago

Let's not forget that AOC voted to protect the rail corporation from a union strike.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

kindly take your scarecrow to another field.

[-] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 30 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

She lost to a 74yr old…yeah that guy needs to retire. Get out of the fucking way.

[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 29 points 18 hours ago

Democrats running out of foot to shoot themselves in

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 107 points 1 day ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

AOC runs several investigations that lead to results.

Connelly... Is old and has seniority.

Great fucking job Democrats. Getting my seat warmer ready for ~~2022~~ 2026 already!

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago
[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

AOC should abandon the Democratic party. She should join Bernie as an god-damned Independent.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 1 day ago

She and Bernie should start a progressive party.

I'm tired of Democrats bowing to oligarchs.

[-] SilentFury@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

I read that as Democrats blowing oligarchs... Same feel tho

load more comments (49 replies)
[-] xenomor@lemmy.world 193 points 1 day ago

I’m glad congressional Democrats are finally taking steps to deal with their sclerotic, ineffective and increasingly out-of-touch leadership and building a future with younger—oh wait.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 131 points 1 day ago

Shit like this (Pelosi putting her thumb on the scale) is why people are questioning if they'll ever vote Democrat again.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 11 points 18 hours ago

Shit like this (Pelosi putting her thumb on the scale) is why people are questioning if they’ll ever vote Democrat again.

Yep, 100% this is at Pelosi's feet. Fuck Nancy Pelosi, and honsestly fuck every D Boomer in congress who won't get out of the way for the younger generations. You are actively holding us back.

load more comments (28 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
273 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2292 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS