this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
252 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

12133 readers
602 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

A fixie without brakes? With that weight on the handle bar? With the most awkward stance because of that huge metal column piercing the riders sternum?

They really didn't like their soldiers, didn't they?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Pull the trigger to use your state-of-the-art recoil-assisted braking system.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 months ago

this reminds me of gta vice city. I used to enable the cheat that allowed cars to fly. One problem: once the car was off the ground it lost traction and all power.

solution: spawn a tank, turn the turret backwards, and use recoil as the airborne thrust.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

back then they were still trying to find a way to securely stop these bikes ☞ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_brake

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm curious if the pedals even had a sprocket on that thing so the wheels could spin without the pedals spinning. That would give it a means to slow down, though it wouldn't be comfortable. You'd have to spread your legs to coast and it would take some skill to get your feet back on the pedals without banging up your legs.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

may be

but the pioneers of fitting the freewheel to the safety bicycle were Linley and Biggs Ltd who fitted a freewheel from the summer of 1894, in part to assist the operation of their 2-speed 'Protean' gear.

By 1899 there was widespread adoption in UK bicycle manufacture of the freewheel, usually combined with the back-pedal brake, and conversions were offered to existing bicycles.

In 1899 the same system in the USA was known as the “coaster brake”, which let riders brake by pedaling backwards and included the freewheel mechanism. At the turn of the century, bicycle manufacturers within Europe and America included the freewheel mechanism in a majority of their bicycles but now the freewheel was incorporated in the rear sprocket of a bicycle unlike Van Anden’s initial design.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Us military? Pretty sure I saw this in detroit last week.....just some guy.

[–] Ste41th@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 months ago

Balancing on that must be shit

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The USAians will put a gun on and into anything, won't they?

[–] Voixe@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I can tell you I put my gun on your mother last night

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

Shit, that's why my Glock 17 wouldn't fit?? How many times do we have to go over the rules, longer barrel lengths to the back of the line so the average folk have a chance.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That gun needs to be mounted further forward, and higher

[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No. It has been my dream to have a crotch operated machine gun mounted to a fixed gear bicycle and I'll be damned if I'm going to let you take that away from me.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

Ohh, sorry. It's the handle and trigger that need an upgrade. I don't know your anatomy but there might be sex specific models

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Bike polo upgrades

[–] TwanHE@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Looks like you're meant to dismount and use the saddle as an armrest

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago

pff, that's not a very interesting approach

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My guess is its designed to be shot only when parked

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 4 months ago

Skill issue :p

[–] resin85@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If you ever have the chance to visit the Anne Frank house in Amsterdam, during the educational talk they discuss why the Dutch army wasn't able to resist the German tanks. They show this picture, and at least on our tour said it was ok to laugh.

[–] pc486@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Vietnam is a counter-example with quite effective bicycle troops. Their army and insurgency was supplied with bicycles on the Ho Chi Minh trail.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Amusing...but their web page goes into the more serious reasons. The main one being that the Nazis were going to carpet-bomb Dutch cities if they didn't surrender.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The modern version:

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What's on the rear rack? Explosives?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Looks kinda like a slightly modified ammo canister. Like this one.

The one I just showed is a .50 caliber round can, which I would guess is close to the size of bullets the machine gun fired.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

This thing required some serious legs. No gears, bad roads if any. Christ...

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Just watched Number 24, which is about Nazi resistance in Norway.

It was wonderful to see them planning and carrying out acts of sabotage by bicycle.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Based honestly

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

A six axle light attack vehicle!!

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Vehicles that don't take user safety into consideration are the best vehicles

[–] Havald@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Lol why did they put wheels on the wheels?

[–] __nobodynowhere@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

2 wheels = fall over

4 wheels = no fall over

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Probably for easy moving for a place like a museum?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

But it has wheels for easy moving.

[–] Amanduh@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Those wheels ARE good for moving, but only moving. Once it's stopped it needs some help to stay upright, and a place like a museum might use a mechanism such as in the picture so they can move the exhibit when needed.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago

Maybe to reduce wear on the original mechanism.

[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He used a NYC ebike to get away

[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago

how does that make it make sense