this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
342 points (97.2% liked)

Greentext

4975 readers
1001 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah fake. No way you can get 90%+ using chatGPT without understanding code. LLMs barf out so much nonsense when it comes to code. You have to correct it frequently to make it spit out working code.

[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 29 minutes ago

i guess the new new gpt actually makes code that works on the first time

[–] janus2@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

isn't it kinda dumb to have coding exams that aren't open book? if you don't understand the material, on a well-designed test you'll run out of time even with access to the entire internet

when in the hell would you ever be coding IRL without access to language documentation and the internet? isn't the point of a class to prepare you for actual coding you'll be doing in the future?

disclaimer did not major in CS. but did have a lot of open book tests—failed when I should have failed because I didn't study enough, and passed when I should have passed because the familiarity with the material is what allows you to find your references fast enough to complete the test

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

I know people that used to work in programming with zero internet connection... this was ~10 years ago... never underestimate the idiocy of companies. P.s. it wasnt even a high security job, the owners were just paranoid boomers.

With that said, with a decent IDE with autocomplete, you can get by a lot without documentation. Its ussually the niche stuff that you need to look up on how to do it.

[–] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 3 points 58 minutes ago

I mean, I don't know how to code but I imagine it's the same as with other subjects. like not being able to use a calculator during some math tests. The point of the examination is for you to demonstrate you know and understand the concepts. It's not for you to be tested in the same way you would be in the real world.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

pay for school

do anything to avoid actually learning

Why tho?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 31 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

This person is LARPing as a CS major on 4chan

It's not possible to write functional code without understanding it, even with ChatGPT's help.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] nthavoc@lemmy.today 3 points 57 minutes ago

Giving me flashbacks to a college instructor that marked my entire functioning code block, written on paper, as wrong because I did not clearly make a ; on one line of about 100 lines. I argued that a compiler would mark that in the real world, but he countered with "It still won't run without that ; " That made me rethink my career path in CS. Fuck that guy.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

You would think eventually some of it would sink in. I mean I use LLMs to write code all the time but it’s very rarely 100% correct, often with syntax errors or logic problems. Having to fix that stuff is an excellent way to at least learn the syntax.

[–] HotCoffee@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

U underestimate the power of the darkside, how powerful ctrl+c ctrl+v is young padawan

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 44 minutes ago)

If you copy and paste from ChatGPT your code won't compile.

You need to know what the peices of code do and how to peice them together to make it work.

Which is kind of impossible to do without understanding it

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Unless they're being physically watched or had their phone sequestered away, they could just pull it up on a phone browser and type it out into the computer. But if they want to be a programmer they really should learn how to code.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I work in a dept. at a university that does all the proctored exams. None of that technology is allowed in the exam rooms. They have to put their watch, phone, headphones, etc in a locker beforehand. And not only are they being watched individually, the computer is locked down to not allow other applications to open and there are outgoing firewalls in place to block most everything network wise. I’m not saying it’s impossible to cheat, but it’s really really hard.

Some instructors still do in class exams, which would make it easier, but most opted for the proctored type exams especially during Covid.

[–] aliser@lemmy.world 89 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 55 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Probably promoted to middle management instead

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 15 points 5 hours ago

He might be overqualified

[–] UnfairUtan@lemmy.world 155 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (7 children)

https://nmn.gl/blog/ai-illiterate-programmers

Relevant quote

Every time we let AI solve a problem we could’ve solved ourselves, we’re trading long-term understanding for short-term productivity. We’re optimizing for today’s commit at the cost of tomorrow’s ability.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

"Every time we use a lever to lift a stone, we're trading long term strength for short term productivity. We're optimizing for today's pyramid at the cost of tomorrow's ability."

[–] julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago

Precisely. If you train by lifting stones you can still use the lever later, but you'll be able to lift even heavier things by using both your new strength AND the leaver's mechanical advantage.

By analogy, if you're using LLMs to do the easy bits in order to spend more time with harder problems fuckin a. But the idea you can just replace actual coding work with copy paste is a shitty one. Again by analogy with rock lifting: now you have noodle arms and can't lift shit if your lever breaks or doesn't fit under a particular rock or whatever.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Actually... Yes? People's health did deteriorate due to over-reliance on technology over the generations. At least, the health of those who have access to that technology.

[–] Ebber@lemmings.world 8 points 3 hours ago

If you don't understand how a lever works, then it's a problem. Should we let any person with an AI design and operate a nuclear power plant?

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

"If my grandma had wheels she would be a bicycle. We are optimizing today's grandmas at the sacrifice of tomorrow's eco friendly transportation."

[–] Daedskin@lemm.ee 16 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

I like the sentiment of the article; however this quote really rubs me the wrong way:

I’m not suggesting we abandon AI tools—that ship has sailed.

Why would that ship have sailed? No one is forcing you to use an LLM. If, as the article supposes, using an LLM is detrimental, and it's possible to start having days where you don't use an LLM, then what's stopping you from increasing the frequency of those days until you're not using an LLM at all?

I personally don't interact with any LLMs, neither at work or at home, and I don't have any issue getting work done. Yeah there was a decently long ramp-up period — maybe about 6 months — when I started on ny current project at work where it was more learning than doing; but now I feel like I know the codebase well enough to approach any problem I come up against. I've even debugged USB driver stuff, and, while it took a lot of research and reading USB specs, I was able to figure it out without any input from an LLM.

Maybe it's just because I've never bought into the hype; I just don't see how people have such a high respect for LLMs. I'm of the opinion that using an LLM has potential only as a truly last resort — and even then will likely not be useful.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] boletus@sh.itjust.works 25 points 8 hours ago

Hey that sounds exactly like what the last company I worked at did for every single project 🙃

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 6 points 6 hours ago

Not even. Every time someone lets AI run wild on a problem, they're trading all trust I ever had in them for complete garbage that they're not even personally invested enough in to defend it when I criticize their absolute shit code. Don't submit it for review if you haven't reviewed it yourself, Darren.

[–] Guttural@jlai.lu 9 points 8 hours ago

This guy's solution to becoming crappier over time is "I'll drink every day, but abstain one day a week".

I'm not convinced that "that ship has sailed" as he puts it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 46 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

I don't think you can memorize how code works enough to explain it and not learn codding.

[–] Paradachshund@lemmy.today 2 points 3 hours ago

I'm pretty sure chatgpt just tells you how it works, so they probably just memorized what it said.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You'd think that, but I believe you are underestimating people's ability to mindlessly memorize stuff without learning it.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's what we're trained to do throughout our education system.

I have a hard time getting mad about it considering it's what we told them to do from a very young age.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

It's super easy to learn how algorithms and what not work without knowing the syntax of a language. I can tell you how a binary search tree works, but I have no clue how to code it in Java because I've never used Java.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And similarly, i could read code in a language I dont know, understand what it does and how it works even if I don't know the syntax well enough to write it myself

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, exactly. At least any fairly modern language. I don't think I could just pick up assembly and read it without the class I took. Heck, I don't think I could read it anymore now that it's been several years since that class.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] boletus@sh.itjust.works 66 points 10 hours ago (18 children)

Why would you sign up to college to willfully learn nothing

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

To get the peice of paper that lets you access a living wage

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of kids fresh out of highschool are pressured into going to college right away. Its the societal norm for some fucking reason.

Give these kids a break and let them go when they're really ready. Personally I sat around for a year and a half before I felt like "fuck, this is boring lets go learn something now". If i had gone to college straight from highschool I would've flunked out and just wasted all that money for nothing.

[–] boletus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 42 minutes ago

Yeah I remember in high school they were pressuring every body to go straight to uni and I personally thought it was kinda predatory.

[–] Gutek8134@lemmy.world 40 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (4 children)

My Java classes at uni:

Here's a piece of code that does nothing. Make it do nothing, but in compliance with this design pattern.

When I say it did nothing, I mean it had literally empty function bodies.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

Mine were actually useful, gotta respect my uni for that. The only bits we didn't manually program ourselves were the driver and the tomcat server, near the end of the semester we were writing our own Reflections to properly guess the object type from a database query.

[–] boletus@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 41 minutes ago)

Yeah that's object oriented programming and interfaces. It's shit to teach people without a practical example but it's a completely passable way to do OOP in industry, you start by writing interfaces to structure your program and fill in the implementation later.

Now, is it a good practice? Probably not, imo software design is impossible to get right without iteration, but people still use this method... good to understand why it sucks

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 hours ago

run it in a vm

load more comments
view more: next ›