this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
553 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19916 readers
5227 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) repeatedly shouted an anti-trans slur despite objections from Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly.

She defended her remarks by attacking transgender rights and dismissing criticism.

The outburst drew condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates and political figures, highlighting her shift from previously supporting LGBTQ+ rights to embracing anti-trans rhetoric.

Mace has used the slur in past statements and introduced legislation restricting transgender rights.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 201 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

This is a government of the absolute worst people.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 41 points 5 days ago (3 children)

For the absolute worst. The votes were not rigged.

[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 24 points 5 days ago (20 children)

We're not going to take this lying down

The votes were not rigged, more reason for us to be ready.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 106 points 5 days ago (2 children)

T**nny today

F**got tomorrow

N****r next week

This is escalation to test the waters

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They are not testing the waters, there isn't a plan. They are just bigots doing hateful things

You are right in that there may be escalation because sooner than later these assholes will realize Trans people are so few as to be invisible to them, they'll once again see their own lives are pitiful and move onto hate someone else just to feel good about themselves for a hot minute

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (8 children)

They are not testing the waters, there isn't a plan.

This is the plan

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago

Yep. Something that I never learned in school, including university. LGBTQ people were among the very first targeted in Nazi Germany.

load more comments (9 replies)

Bigoted bitch

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 72 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I hope she chokes on her vomit in her sleep.

[–] tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Realistically, I'd be happy for her to choke on pretty much anyone's vomit. Extra points for creativity.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We need to speak more regularly about how these people obviously have kompromat on them and are being actively blackmailed - no sympathy as they are garbage humans regardless, but these changes in stance are so swift and violent. These people often have a history of not caring or even supporting these issues, before they become over the top, performative hate mouthpieces - it's so obvious that they were basically told by Republican operatives at some point, "you're gonna do what we say or we are going to fucking end your pleasant life". Again, no sympathy there because the underlying subtext is that these people do shit horrible enough that they can be blackmailed with it. But this is Mace as recently as 2023:

"I'm pro-transgender rights," she told CBS News' The Takeout in May 2023. "I'm pro-LGBTQ." The Republican lawmaker made the comments while saying she opposed gender-affirming care for minors. "Sex change surgery, the hormone blockers that sterilize our children, we shouldn't be doing that," Mace said. "Now, if they want to take on a different pronoun or a different gender identity, or grow their hair out, or wear a dress, or wear pants, or do those things as a minor, those are all things that I think most people would support. Be who you want to be, but don't make those permanent changes when it's a child," she added.

Not a perfect position by any means, but centuries away from what she is today.

And here is after she was first elected in '21:

She was one of the only Republicans to sponsor the Serving Our LGBTQ Veterans Act in 2021, which proposed establishing a Center for LGBTQ Veterans within the Department of Veterans Affairs. That same year, she even called for “transgender equality” while asserting herself as a pro-LGBTQ+ rights lawmaker. “I strongly support LGBTQ rights and equality,” Mace told the Washington Examiner. “No one should be discriminated against.” “It isn’t a black-and-white issue,” Mace added. “I do believe that religious liberty, the First Amendment, gay rights, and transgender equality can all coexist. I’m also a constitutionalist, and we have to ensure anti-discrimination laws don’t violate First Amendment rights or religious freedom.”

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I don't think kompromat is necessary. These are power-hungry and attention-hungry people. They'll say and do whatever panders to the people who will pay attention to them in the moment. J K Rowling didn't need to be blackmailed to go from saying she supported transgender rights to becoming one of the Internet's worst purveyors of trans-hate. Many other "influencers" have gone the same route, including a few who are trans themselves. (Matt Bernstein has some good videos about these people.) Overt transphobia is a thing you can do to score cheap points with ignorant people and get attention, approval and money. There's enough motivation there for a certain kind of character, with no need for blackmail.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 64 points 5 days ago

Methinks this Caitlyn Jenner doppelgänger doth protest too much.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 14 points 4 days ago

When Sarah Palin came about, surely I thought she was the most craziest dumbest and racist female brunette politician ever.

Why are there more?!

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 5 days ago (48 children)

How come the reporting is censoring the word?

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 94 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Hate speech is censored to avoid normalizing language intended to encourage violence against the disempowered.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 43 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Oooh, nicely put.

Before your comment, I was thinking, "why not show the word? What word could it be? I'm a big boy and it won't hurt me," but ... after your comment I think I get it.

I may have to take this away and think on it, and thank you for the catalyst.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

Fuck yeah. Personal growth for the win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lysergid@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

It makes no sense. How people know the word that should not be normalized? I’m non-native speaker and after all blah blah in this thread I still have no idea what is the word. So if someone says it, I won’t even know I should call out that person. Don’t we normalize using slurs by softening reporting? If slur censored why would bigots stop using it if they are not properly shamed? All it does is just hiding issue from media with no effect IRL. IRL, US elected bigot

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
[–] Ghosthacked@lemm.ee 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The MAGA Cult holy grail is when they can keep their careers intact after shouting the N-word in the capitol and say that they don't care.

They're almost there. Keep sleeping, murica

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

The actual stripping of protections, the laws they are or will pass, those are bad enough already, but sometimes it feels like the worst part is just how brave these bigot shitfuckers have become now that their pet nazi is in power. They don't even have the decency to be afraid to fly their hate flag anymore. They were always shitty people, but at least they used to feel like the country at large would reject them for expressing their true feelings, hence all the pushback against "Cancel Culture." Now, though, they're not even afraid of ostriziation, much less anything more substantial.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I actually read the article and clicked on the link to the hearing back and forth and can't find what the anti trans slur was. Honestly I can't think of what an anti trans slur would be so I guess its possible I somehow missed it but I assumed it would be obvious.

[–] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Saying "tranny" is a slur.

ok yeah. I would have picked up on that I think. I did not see it. I mean I get they don't want to say the slur but having to rely on someones basically opinion on what is what is sorta difficult nowadays.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

This bigot had a trans-rights activist arrested for "Assault" right after shaking hands with them.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 19 points 5 days ago

What a vile human.

[–] SpitefulSprite@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Shouldn't she be hiding in a bathroom somewhere, faking injuries while trying to inspect other people's genitals?

[–] straightjorkin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

God this bitch is so desperate to cling to her 15 minutes of fame.

[–] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

That's rich, coming from a sandwich-maker that left the kitchen.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 9 points 4 days ago

Someone deserves to be maced, that much is certain. May you go to hell, Mace.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 9 points 4 days ago

What a cissy.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Some future documentarian's job just got easier.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›