this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
34 points (81.5% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10398 readers
2 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Everything uses kde these days

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago

KDE is an organization that makes a desktop environment and associated apps. The DE is called Plasma, but was initially called KDE and many still call it that. I think the joke is that since the rocket uses actual plasma and KDE is popular lately, they're saying the rocket uses KDE Plasma.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago
[–] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

so then have fun and take the elong with you

[–] rimu@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

To go there in 30 days you'd need to disregard any orbital mechanics and just burn straight there. This would require an extraordinary amount of energy. Also surely making plasma from an electrical current must require, again, an extraordinary amount of energy. Also the faster you accelerate the more fuel you need to expend to DE-cellerate when you get there.

I dunno man, seems like bullshit. I'm no rocket scientist, obvs. But at a gut-feel level, this seems way off.

[–] sabin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Not to mention, if you accelerate your spacecraft to a speed faster than the minimum speed needed to raise your orbit as far as mars, you're going to have to slow down by the difference between your speed and that min speed when you go for a landing anyways.

The pace of the orbits alone decides how quickly your spacecraft will get there.

[–] FatLegTed@piefed.social 3 points 2 months ago

You could always flip and burn.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

Ok. And? Even if they don’t have an appropriate power source yet, still cool to have built the engine.

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 10 points 2 months ago

I'm not believing that. The shortest distance between Earth and Mars is 35.8M mi (57.6M km). The average speed would need to be ~50k mph (80 kph). Top speed would need to be much higher to account for acceleration and deceleration. That would also mean we'd need enough fuel for constant acceleration the whole trip.

Even then, that's considering a perfect straight line if both planets are going the same speed and have no gravity. But, orbital flight doesn't work like that. First, we'd have to leave the Earth's gravity well. Then, float along between the two while orbiting the Sun in an arc, which would make the distance longer since it's not a straight line (see image below). Once at Mars, we'd need to decelerate (accelerate in the opposite direction) much more than on Earth because of Mars lower gravity meaning slower orbital speed.

Also, Russia can't tell the truth. It's part of their psyops. Always lying teaches people that truth is whatever they say, not objective reality.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does it run on putin's farts?

[–] Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Those farts are exclusively bottled for the orange fascist in the white house, to take a sniff whenever he has the need to feel close to daddy Putin

[–] Nfamwap@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

How do you delete other users posts?

[–] FatLegTed@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The article says 30-60 days.

So possibly twice as long as the first estimate. Bit of a difference there.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I suppose so, but the expected flight time currently is 9 to 15 months - so this is an incredible achievement if true.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

You do realize Mars and Earth do not orbit the sun at the same rate? When the ship launches will affect the distance to travel.

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember reading about this in Popular Science when I was younger

Yeah, isn't this just a Russian version of the VASIMR engine?

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The only actual metric they quoted is exhaust speed? Really? BS detector is ringing

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The only actual metric they quoted is exhaust speed?

Not saying we shouldn't be skeptical, but isn't that the most important metric? A crazy-high exhaust velocity is how you get an engine with crazy-high specific impulse.

[–] randombullet@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I would argue that fuel consumption would be quite important, same with power usage.

Edit: and also exhaust mass. If it's 1g of mass exhausted then it's a moot point.

Fuel type, specific impulse, thrust, power consumption, engine mass and volume...

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

This is true to cosmonauts well before they get anywhere near spacecraft

[–] FatLegTed@piefed.social 0 points 2 months ago

Get Musk to test it himself.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Probably just trying to sell something to Elon in this new age of cooperation between Russia and USA to subjugate the rest of the world.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Who wants to do the math on how many Gs the acceleration would create?

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Probably not much. Electric propulsion is usally pretty low thrust.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I meant for their theoretical 30 day trip.

What an absolutely fucking fascinating coincidence.