this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
83 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

48943 readers
405 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works 86 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Not a specific example, but it infuriates me more than anything when people say it doesn't matter that hardware, software and media are becoming increasingly dependent on an internet connection to operate.

People lack the foresight to care that the things they are paying for right now, wont last like similar things do from 10-20+ years ago.

Your old dvds, vhs, cds, vinyls, game consoles, tvs telephones.

The current implementations of these mediums have taken ownership away from the consumer, and nobody cares.

I anticipate a massive loss of historically pertinent hardware and information that will result in the new norm of paying for limited access to anything and everything.

Maximum consumption and profit, minimal preservation and environmental efficiency.

Nobody cares, like we are all slowly boiling frogs.

[–] AntY@lemmy.world 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

These devices also collect a lot of personal data. The internet connection isn’t necessarily for the device to be useful, but rather to serve ads or sell user information to the highest bidder. Just look at how cars gather data that insurance companies buy. Or the news that Jeep were going to start displaying ads in the center console.

[–] k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

The motives behind this or any form of planned obsolescence are various, usually greed is the reasoning central to these motives, but none of them justify the detriment to the end user(from the end user's perspective).

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] nick@midwest.social 55 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Trump getting elected in 2016. β€œThe checks and balances will keep him in line” I was told.

To that I say: go fuck yourself.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The same people are saying the same thing this time around. It’s insane.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago

They're doing it while seeing him dismantle those checks and balances.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I heard a lot of "you survived the first time, it's fine," when he got reelected. Ah yes, that pandemic we all survived. The constant food recalls where none of us got sick. The uptick in gun violence that made all of us so safe and cozy. Not to mention the famously survivable ectopic pregnancies!

No big deal indeed.

[–] nick@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago

For 2025: The aviation crashes and mishaps that are famously no big deal

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

When looking at firearm homicides specifically, in terms of raw numbers (not rate), the low point was 2014, during Obama's second term. It started to move upwards in '15 and '16, prior to Trump taking office, and continued increasing at the same pace through '17. We see the first real sharp jump in '18, but then an equally sharp decline in '19, back to levels on par with Obama's last year in office, followed the next year by another sharp increase. Interestingly, Biden's 2nd year as president (2022) had the most number of firearm homicides in, I dunno, 30-odd years?

We'd been on a long, downward trend in homicides since '92. It's not clear to me what caused the rate to begin to head back up. I don't think that Obama, Trump, or Biden can realistically be directly blamed for the bulk of it, although a small number of homicides at the margins might be more directly related to them (e.g., Trump encourages racial violence, and so a small number of homicide might be due to his tacit support). I don't think that it's directly related to economics either, because the economy that Obama inherited when he took office in 2009 had been wrecked by the housing bubble crash; it it was directly related to economics, then I would have thought that gun violence would be peaking around '09 or '10. I guess it could be a lagging indicator though? (...But there is a sharp increase in '20, when the pandemic gets really bad and unemployment hits record highs.)

Again, keep in mind that these are homicides, and not suicides. firearm suicides still make up the majority of deaths caused by firearms in the US.

OTOH, I understand what you mean about feeling less safe under Trump, even if there wasn't an immediate spike in gun homicides. I know a lot of people--esp. LGBTQ+ people--are feeling very unsafe with Trump in the White House right now, and I believe that they're right to feel unsafe and at-risk.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh hey, I appreciate the info! Seems I misremembered. I actually attempted to double check before posting but kept getting wildly different numbers from different sources.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Truffle@lemmy.ml 50 points 4 months ago (3 children)

When people dismiss children's concerns. Maybe to adults is not a big deal, but to kids it does matter. I make an effort to pay attention and listen when a child tells me something.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This. Sexual abuse goes ignored because of this attitude in parents

[–] Truffle@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Absolutely and lets add that some children only disclose once to a trusted adult who might not always pay attention. It breaks my heart.

[–] lady_maria@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I also feel particularly passionate about this, as felt totally dismissed by nearly every adult in my life as a kid. That shit feels so defeating and isolating. it can seriously fuck you up.

[–] Truffle@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

It is. Sending you an internet Hug. You matter and should have had someone who listened to you back then. πŸ’œ

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

as felt totally dismissed by nearly every adult in my life as a kid

So at some point it stopped for you?

[–] lady_maria@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I wish. lol. no, I just became an adult.

[–] StanislavP@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Something I sometimes forget as well. Great reply.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 36 points 4 months ago

Trump getting elected

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

People not caring about their privacy and their data being collected and sold to everyone. "Eh, it's not like my data is worth anything". If it wasn't, it wouldn't be sold, moron. All those spam and scam calls you receive? Yeah, that's because your "worthless" data is being sold, resold and spread out everywhere. But hey, if you fall for a scam and lose, dunno, 50k dollars, it's not a big deal, huh?

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 8 points 4 months ago

If it wasn't, it wouldn't be sold, moron.

I think more people should be concerned about their privacy, but I don't really agree with this premise. It's kind of like if there were diamonds in some peoples trash, so a company collected everyone's trash so sift through it and take the diamonds to sell. The fact that some people's trash is valuable enough for them to do this, doesn't mean mine is.

That's how these work, they hoover up everything and sell it in bulk. It doesn't mean any given users data is valuable. And that's why so many don't care.

As far as scam calls go, I have a number I have never given to anyone outside immediate family, who I know haven't shared it, and still received scam calls. They just call every number, even if you don't answer. Pretty sure if it rings at all they flag it as potentially active. Sure spreading it around may increase the number, but there's no true way to hide.

[–] 0_0j@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

If it wasn't, it wouldn't be sold, moron.

πŸ˜‚ More people should be aware of this.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago

Lack of high quality public transit.

"Just drive bro"

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

ads based internet is the death of democracy

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why are ads being made for the internet?

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The comment is about the case google won for collection and selling data of individuals and the ramifications of that case. This is the primary underlying issue in the present.

The right to own and sell a part of a personβ€”their digital self is ultimately a forfeiture of autonomous citizenship. It is also an implied forfeiture of freedom of information which is the third pillar of democracy. Allowing the ownership over a part of a citizen is giving up citizenship. This is why you do not own anything, and everything is a subscription, and enshitification; it is all due to this one core issue of your right to own all of yourself free from slavery including the sale and exploitation of a part of your person. This is a master link, the precedent that lead to where we are at. "The ads based internet" is about the sale and collection of your personal data with the intent to exploit you. That is a violation of a fundamental human right. This was never about banner ads. It is about placing people in information bubbles and spheres of influence. It is about stupid consumers and corporate overlords extracting taxes for every move a peasant makes. Such is the true power of controlling information. Like your internet search results are not deterministic. It does not matter where you search. There are only 2 web crawlers that are relevant in the present world; Google/Microsoft. All others indirectly query these two. They can fingerprint and track nearly everyone in real time. You are being targeted for more than just ads. This is the death of democracy because a citizen must be autonomous and well informed in any democracy and this is not possible when you can be manipulated through bowdlerization and targeted misinformation or overload.

[–] POTOOOOOOOO@reddthat.com 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Dog poop in my car. The owner insisted it was not a big deal. I told them zero poop is allowed in my car and made them clean the seat.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

If poop is NBD to them they shouldn’t mind cleaning it.

[–] Chulk@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I had a discussion/argument in ~2018 with a friend who is/was very anti-trump. I brought up the dangers of ICE and how, at the time, they were the biggest sign of an overtly fascist future. He immediately handwaved it and dismissed me as crazy.

He's got a degree in history education and was obsessed with WW2 history, so I didn't think this would be a point of contention. But for a lot of liberals (including him) Fascists have to literally be wearing a swastika before they're called what they are. Some won't even acknowledge the existence of a Nazi Salute when they see one.

Even today he's obsessed with Trump as the single anomaly in US politics and doesn't see the bigger picture.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"Capitalism isn't a big deal."

As though giving a select few billions won't corrupt the nation around them over time.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

And as a corollary, people acting how they just can't imagine how an economy could possibly work if people who do the actual work owned their means of production.

[–] threeduck@aussie.zone 11 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Eating meat. It contributes 15-20% of the entire planets greenhouse gasses alone. And people do it just for pleasure. It's mindboggling.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago (16 children)

people do it just for pleasure

there are other reasons, and pretending there aren't won't help youconvince the people who continue to choose it.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 6 points 3 months ago

Some people would look at the oncoming environmental end of civilisation and go "ugh, another VEGAN trying to shove their ideology down my throat"

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

What consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home is not the matter of the state!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Pronouns. Especially bad when a 2SLGBTQIA+ person makes out like its not a big deal.

Its the most simple, base level thing you can do (using correct pronouns for someone etc). Doing it is not a big deal. Its very easy. But if you choose not to, despite how small of a deal it is, then you turn it into a very big deal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 months ago

Accepting the Democrats support for the genocide of the Palestinian people just because of β€œvoting for the lesser evil”

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί