this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1620 points (96.8% liked)

Science Memes

13322 readers
5718 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 8 points 10 hours ago

People who see gender as a F or M binary in 2025 are willingly ignorant to the bone.

[–] RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 hours ago (11 children)

Critically thinking now, how strong is the evidence here?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] holdstrong@lemm.ee 46 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

“It’s basic biology” mfs when advanced biology

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

it is basic biology, ie biology simplified to teach a kid in middle school. the thing is sciences don't stop at middle school level. a lot of university education is about clarifying that things you learned before were simplified to the point that they're practically useless if not outright wrong.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Light travels in straight lines, next year its a wave and then its particles. What you said isso true about uni rethreading.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

To be fair light does travel in straight lines (more or less... ignoring that nothing travels in any set or even single path something something veritasium video), its not lights fault if a straight line in physical reality doesn't always happen to match up with the geometry we invented.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

See I didnt go that far, mindboggling

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.

But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

Many people with PhD's have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.

A PhD doesn't make you infallible.

I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I'm correct, it's not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it's because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 22 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

that's why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.

Exactly, imagine if we threw away the entire peer review process and made it about, "Well I have a PhD! Checkmate."

We'd descend into a dark age for science.

Experts often disagree.

If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn't need so much research or so many universities.

[–] Lumbardo@reddthat.com 1 points 12 hours ago

If one hasn't fallen victim to Dunning-Kruger, then they have not advanced their knowledge in any meaningful capacity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

....and all in between, hormonal and/or physically. "Only two genders" is false

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The phrase is funny but you wouldn't catch me dead wearing a logical fallacy

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Can I interest you in a logical phallus?

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 3 points 10 hours ago

Wouldn't that be a logic probe?

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 1 day ago (5 children)

To be fair, a Person with a PhD still can have Dunning-Kruger on other subjects.

Ben Carson is a great Neurosurgeon, but dumbass on politics.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Neil deGrasse Tyson and literally anything other than astrophysics

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 7 hours ago

And sometimes also astrophysics

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online 56 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I think a lot of these XX XY "only two genders" people aren't just dunning Kruger, they're transphobic idiots with an agenda. So even if they had the science and knowledge it wouldn't matter because they're pushing their hateful stupid agenda, facts and logic be damned. They don't care, they just want to rationalize hating us trans people because we make them uncomfy.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] LongLive@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Error: url1 and url2 are the same

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tibi@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I think it's sus that a Math Lecturer decides to post an article about philosophy and then doesn't describe any of the steps he took. The article basically just says i did a thing, but doesnt explain what he did/how to reproduce the result... On the other hand, philosophy is a field with many wrong conclusions and the like, so it is believable. But again in my eyes it's not proven, since it's just 'one guy' saying something and not replicated nor reproduced.

Edit after replied comment edit: The second article you linked (actually the first in the post) changes my believe about the dunning-kruger effect. Thank you for sharing!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›