this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
698 points (98.3% liked)

News

28389 readers
4576 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

When Donald Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Bannon said “I’m a firm believer that President Trump will run and win again in 2028,” last week, it should have been a surprise, but wasn’t. “We’re working on it. … We’ll see what the definition of term limit is,”the dishevelled Bannon told NewsNation. It wasn’t the first time he had mentioned it either. The president’s adviser, who went to prison for refusing to testify before a congressional committee about the 6 January insurrection, suggested it in December. Then, he argued that Trump could circumvent the 22nd amendment, which codifies the two-term limit, because the word “consecutive” is not in the text of the document.

Trump has been making his feelings clear too. Shortly after his election victory last November, the president told congressional Republicans: “I suspect I won’t be running again unless you say, ‘He’s so good we’ve got to figure something else out’.” 

Then, in January, during the annual House Republican retreat in Florida, he joked with speaker Mike Johnson: “Am I allowed to run again, Mike?” In February, he asked supporters at the White House: “Should I run again? You tell me.” Offhand musings about a third term in office sound less like bluster and more like a blueprint.

If we’re sharing articles can we make the effort to add a couple relevant paragraphs under the headline? Otherwise the discussion ends up being about the headline and often innaccurate.

[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

You’d think that the absence of the word “consecutive” and the phrase “no… more than twice” would mean quite clearly that it’s two terms period, not one, plus two consecutive terms.

Unless, of course, these fuckheads are arguing that consecutive terms count as one.

Fuck.

[–] Fillicia@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If consecutives terms would count as one then Obama could run again.

[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

No, no. You see, you have to serve one term, skip one, and then serve two.

Or, just be republican.

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ill try to do that but... People should also read the article before before impulse commenting.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

As someone who’se shared hundreds of articles on reddit then lemmy.

Good luck getting more than 1% to read the article. People want headlines, scrollable information bits that they can instinctively react on.

That’s why paragraphs under are useful. Makes people atleast read those before commenting a gut reaction to an oversimplified headline.

[–] Davin@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Weird, guy who breaks laws with impunity doesn't care about laws.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If I understand correctly, the magoffs like Bannon want to craft it to exclude Obama (and Bill Clinton and W) but include donvict.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-third-term-proposal-has-clause-stop-barack-obama-running-2020334

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

For me not for thee...

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org -4 points 6 days ago

And stick his tongue in.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Why? Because no matter how much the unhinged right, many "centrists", and some of the leftists and a lot of the corporate media mocked those among the Democrats that said democracy is at risk....it is.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

At risk? It's dead no matter what party. It's time to start rebuilding.

[–] DistressedDad@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

If Trump was elected in the 80s, he wouldn't be alive long enough to change the name plate of the oval office desk. We're living through such a wild time in history.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

There is a dictatorship happening to the south. Professors are leaving Yale University for the University of Toronto. For God’s sake, get out and vote in Canada in our upcoming election. Danielle Smith is blatantly snuggling up with MAGA. And PP keeps changing his ideologies with the political wind. Save our sovereignty.

Reading this thread makes me love lemmings.

[–] MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al 177 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think they're going to let a little thing like the laws get in the way of a good time.

[–] raoulduke85@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Like he’ll be alive in 4 years.

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How about a national militia of tesla burners?

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 73 points 1 week ago

I remember the Russian military recruitment offices burning these past years, and their railroads getting sabotaged.

The western press proudly stated "this is what happens when you don't allow people to protest, they turn to sabotage".

But I guess this administration missed the memo.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Haess@lemmynsfw.com 143 points 1 week ago (11 children)

God, I wish that kid didn't miss.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 120 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Yes, but if Trump refuses to leave office then he will need some serious guards. My understanding of the Constitution is that he becomes a domestic threat at that point and "fighting him" is technically legal ... and required by anyone that took an oath to defend the Constitution.

[–] sith@lemmy.zip 20 points 6 days ago

The constitution means whatever the guy with the biggest guns says it means.

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago

He's already a domestic threat, he doesn't care about the Constitution or laws

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Don't all Americans take that oath every day in school?

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Technically he's barred from office per the 14th amendment.

Technically is great until it's ignored.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 79 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just remember, if his new administration has proven anything, it is that the difference between legal and illegal in the American political system is mostly down to everyone being willing to go along with that law. There is very little actual teeth behind a lot of it at the high up federal level.

So it might be unconstitutional for him to run again, but who is actually going stop him? He has more guns and more sycophants than the court system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atempuser23@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›