this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
892 points (98.3% liked)

memes

14781 readers
4585 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world 92 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Baby: costs thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars over a minimum of 18 years

Monitor: shows memes and games, costs a few hundred dollars for a good one, one time purchase

Obviously the child is the stupid financial decision

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It depends on where you live. Believe it or not, kids still care for their elderly parents in some nations.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Making a life-changing decision - for more than just yourself - on the assumption that they will want anything to do with you in 40 years is, how do I put this... stupid as fuck?

And that assumes they also are able-bodied, of sound mind and judgement, can care for any others financially...

My folks are getting up there in age, and I'm not getting any younger myself. They are religious, I'm not. I'm LGBT, they are bigoted. I can understand the big picture of caring for others through community, they don't. They are still very capable and mobile, I'm disabled. What side of the fence do you think I'm on?

They could have just used a fucking condom. They should have. They didn't.

[–] ReplicantBatty@lemmy.one 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

My mom would straight up tell us we were supposed to take care of her when she got old, it's literally the only reason I was ever given for why I was made. For that and other reasons I'm no-contact now, but it's an incredibly toxic mindset and even worse that you're inflicting that on your kids.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think the key to this scheme working, however, is that you raise your children in such a selfless way that they would want to take care of you when you have nothing more to offer them. Which is to say, the only way this method works is if it’s not a “method” at all, just love.

Edit: inb4 honor culture. In the places you likely refer to, uncared-for elderly are considered a great dishonor. But also in these places, differences in social infrastructure and the parameters of personal finance significantly augment the decision. In short, it’s still a net cost of time and resources to raise a child, a balance that can only be paid by love.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m sure my daughter would want to. The problem is it’s completely unrealistic in the US. When I’m too old to care for myself, I’m going to insist on a nursing home. Hell, the LAN parties are going to be great by then.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s true. These days the average household income in the US isn’t enough for the added costs of elderly care without the supplement of social security and other programs. That trend only worsens.

I’m optimistic, however, that this will change as the differences in generational attitudes towards socialism are reflected more strongly in governmental policy. The baby boomers are already losing their grip on the levers of politics, and the millennials, in particular, are much more friendly to social policies.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s true, although this administration is perfectly timed to siphon off the largest wealth transfer in US history with the demise of the boomers.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

True, though statistically it’s just cleaning the plate, as global elites have had their fill over many decades. Once people finally decide to stop pointing fingers at each other and unite against this scourge, there will be nowhere to run.

Afterward, global economies should stabilize and nations which start this process early will, I suspect, see much growth during the global recovery, so here’s hoping americans have some revolutionary spirit left.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My concern on that front is trust. After electing Trump, Biden, Trump, our allies see the US as a rocking ship. Our allies’ trust in us will take more than a term to regain.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

For sure. I imagine it will take far more than one government/term to rehabilitate and repair international relationships (decades, I’d wager) but I think within our lifetimes we’ll get to see it!

[–] pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Are you telling me that you have kids only they can clean your ass and shit when you older? And people here on dbzero is giving you positive feedback?? Wow... Fucking hypocritical people when it's a rich the egotistical bastard so eat the rich but when is a normal person you celebrate it, such a clown show.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Me at 35: well at least I don’t live on the streets

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Somebody now 15, when they're 35: Well maybe I'll get off the streets soon.

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 5 points 1 month ago

Assuming they are still alive, yes.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

I took on a second, what have I done.

[–] M137@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (11 children)

Here in Sweden I'm experiencing this with both older and younger generations. I know no one my age that has a kid, but so many younger generations have at least one. My little sister has two, and most of her friends do too. It's weird.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

My little sister has two, and most of her friends do too. It's weird.

I suppose that makes sense. Support has gotten much stronger, in the last decade or two, for using multiple monitors.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ThatGuyNamedZeus@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago

The boomers fucked the economy. Their mentality is "FUCK YOU! I GOT MINE!"

[–] mastod0n@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

At 35 I got my third!

...27" curved screen with 144Hz and HDR...

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not sure if he's thinking about a second monitor or a second smoke.

[–] ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Why not both? I haven't seen that taco girl meme in a decade or so.

1000003841

[–] FabledTurtle@feddit.nl 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ahh the PG32UCDM! This is best panel I have ever seen, I love mine but the only downside is when it's off the coil whine is crazy loud, almost louder than my system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Anyone here ever used curved monitors? I'm seeing them come down in price and wonder if it's cool enough to get

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unless they are huge and ultra-wide, I don't see the point. They don't add anything at small sizes except a certain aesthetic. At large sizes, it's a quality of life improvement as things on the edges are closer than with flat screens. They were more expensive when I looked for them, so test it for the 14-30 day return period and see if you actually like it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rice@lemmy.org 7 points 1 month ago

I hate them, wife loves them.. so good luck lol

[–] dodos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I like my ultrawides curved, but wouldn't want a 16:9 curved.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have a 32inch flat, wouldn't recommend that size unless curved.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

lol. I have a 50 inch flat screen on my desk. You can get used to anything. Though my desk is almost a meter deep and the screen sits right on the edge.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I had 3 by 23 😁

Still have only 2 kids though

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

just bought a third yesterday...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Laughable, I think about MINUTES!

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

I already have 2 monitors (including my laptop screen because I'm primarily on laptop) but recently I tried using Google Earth on a desktop with a fast i7-13700 and a 1440p monitor and it was so immersive. If each pixel was 100m, I could see 256km, all with minimal hiccups.

It reminded me I want a big 4k Monitor for this stuff, maybe even of TV size.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

This would seem more accurate to me if it said "Grandparents at 25". I'm the 25yo parent's age and for us, people were already considering whether they could afford 1 or 2 children with mortgage and childcare costs. I guess if we had the big screen TVs, cellphones stronger than computers, gaming computers, and cheap airfare around the world, many of us would have also decided parenting was much too expensive.

[–] peteypete420@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

My two crapped out at around the same time. So im at one now. Nothing fancy, but im pretty damed pleased for... i think it was 110? Might get a second of the same.

load more comments
view more: next ›