this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
533 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

69867 readers
2737 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Automakers and tech developers testing and deploying self-driving and advanced driver assistance features will no longer have to report as much detailed, public crash information to the federal government, according to a new framework released today by the US Department of Transportation.

https://archive.ph/wWwjG

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 131 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This would be REALLY Corrupt if Elon Musk had donated a QUARTER BILLION DOLLARS TO TRUMP and then was Given a Government Oversight Position! FORTUNATELY Fox News told me that DIDNT happen!

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ICE! ICE! LOOK AT THIS GUY! HE'S CLEARLY ANTI-AMERICAN AND UN-PATRIOTIC!

the clock is ticking before comments like this actually become serious.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hammer time

[–] prex@aussie.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

The all caps get me every time. Just take your damn upvote.

[–] LarryLurkman@lemm.ee 108 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm still not buying one of those jalopy ass shits.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 84 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes, but you'll be on the roads with them.

[–] LarryLurkman@lemm.ee 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup, and that sleazy ass pig Donald Trump is making the roads more dangerous. I'm sick of his fucking shit.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

He does look like an ass pig.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We hide from the robots during the rain and snow, because they can't see where they have to go

[–] grainOfSalt@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't even think about that. My adaptive cruise doesn't even work in the snow because the sensor gets covered up. And I'm pretty sure that's better tech than what Tesla uses.

[–] L3s@hackingne.ws 16 points 2 weeks ago

will no longer have to report as much detailed, public crash information to the federal government

I feel like this is more incentive not to purchase one, than to purchase one

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don’t wanna get hit by one of these waiting for the bus.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well that's OK. There's too many massive emotional support vehicles on the road already.

[–] Boeman@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why would a self driving car be waiting for a bus?

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 40 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

All I can say is invest in 4k vehicle cameras. Get one facing one and one facing the rear. CYA for when these self-driving Teslas start crashing into everything.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

and thus america became that much more like russia

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 5 points 2 weeks ago

At least we got some wild videos out of that I guess? Peak internet days.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

give it a few months, and you won't be allowed to sue tesla any more. i'm fucking serious.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Your going to need a body cam. The car isn't too bad with others cars, it's people and bikes and motorcycles it has real problems with.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think the problem was they probably trained the AI on Americans driving normally i.e badly, Americans have zero lane discipline, every video I've ever seen of Americans driving is like an instructional video on how not to do it.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Got a recommendation? I'm in

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 2 points 2 weeks ago

I have a Rove camera I got a few years ago. I want to get a second one for the back (I guess they sell a dual kit now).

[–] db2@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Dot: This poop? 94 days.

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Serious question: If I get hit by one of these death machines, who can I (or my next-of-kin) sue? Has that been established in court?

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In a Musk-approved world:

  • You're hit by a Tesla in FSD mode, the driver gets sued for not driving.
  • You're hit by a fully autonomous Tesla taxi, you get sued for vandalism.
  • You're the driver and FSD hit someone, you get sued.
  • You're the owner and the car hits someone while you're not in it, you get sued for owning it.
  • You're the owner and it catches fire with you inside, you(r estate) gets sued for "not maintaining it".
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In all cases, the warranty on the Tesla in question is immediately voided. And the odometer starts running 15% faster with every major incident.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Serious answer: the owner of the vehicle is responsible for it. You sue the owner, their insurance, possibly your insurance, possibly tesla, possibly nobody. The best result is to walk away avoiding court with more money.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well that's convenient for the author maker / oligarch / unelected government squatter running the country. I guess every once in awhile things just turn up his way.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

the neat thing about oligarchs is the betting odds that they'll keep their heads

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 21 points 2 weeks ago

Great news for them in one country I guess!

[–] vala@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Wow such boon

[–] Lumiluz@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 weeks ago
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

It won't help Tesla one wit. They are going to collapse.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

The boon here isn't that it'll allow them to bring a shoddy product to market. The boon is they'll be able to continue milking investors by hiding the fact that they have no marketable product in this space while they keep selling off their stock.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

In a delightful change of pace, the Nazis are putting themselves in the oven.

[–] drperil@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

Shocking…

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Owning a tesler is embarrassing. Even in my deep red trump loving state, most people would never buy one.

[–] grainOfSalt@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Roadrunner cartoon style murals everywhere it is, then.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago

I have absolutely no problem with self-driving vehicles and I'm fully prepared to accept that it is a possibility in the near future. However I am also utterly confident that it won't be Tesla that finally cracks it, and I am sure that they will still call it "full self driving" even in a future where we have actual full self driving.

The law really needs to be laid down on this stuff, unless it can actually drive itself without a human even in the vehicle, and do so reliably, then they're not allowed to call it anything that implies that capability.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

It'll only benefit Tesla if anyone buys their shoddy cars.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I wonder if the author realizes there are other companies making "self-driving" vehicles.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm sure that they're just as shitty and more concerned with profits than safety, just like Tesla. When you don't punish companies and ceo's like you would a homeless person, or teacher, or doctor, or police officer, or fireman, then they have no incentive to do anything other than profit at the expense of society.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

So you're saying that a corrupt man in power uses that power to benefit himself at the expense of the public, but it's not corruption, because additional parties also happen to benefit?

i must be misunderstanding

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›