this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
81 points (90.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40672 readers
448 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I thought with the explosion of electric power and windmills and the electric vehicle boom, fossil fuels would not be required..

Yet, a lot of countries still generate coal and other fossil fuels, is it because there is still filthy amounts of profit there to be made? Maybe they are just so used to it they don't wanna swap to another resource?

I thought with Solar panels being massively produced, it would sell like hot cakes and you're literally having the power of the sun in your hand.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

Despite the replies, the real answer is that it's not as simple as "stopping drilling".

The fossil fuel industry isn't just oil and fuel...it's quite literally everything.

  • The vulkanized rubber in the tires of your electric vehicle...yep...petroleum based.

  • The hard plastic that forms the interior panels, and the side walls, the steering wheel and literally everything else made of plastic on the planet? You guessed it...petroleum based.

  • The lubricants that keep the chains chaining, the gears gearing, the whirligigs whirling and the moving parts moving....once again...petroleum based.

  • Much of the cosmetics industry, as well as chapsticks, lotions, sunscreens, etc.... Yep...all have at least some petroleum based ingredients.

  • The calking and rubber cement that keeps the tiles your walking on stuck to the floor...yep...you guessed it.

Are you starting to get it?

Hippies can complain all they want, and I ABSOLUTELY agree that we need to be moving away from the petroleum industry faster. But it's not a matter of switching to electric cars because EVERY part of modern life is from the roads we drive on to the keyboard I'm typing this one, is in some way or another making use of a petroleum based product.

We have a long hard road before that's not the case anymore.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If we stopped drilling except for those use cases, I'd be a happy hippie. I'm not a hippie today, but I'm willing to change.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Oh believe me. I would be too. We'd buy ourselves a hell of a lot of time. I'm just pointing out that the solution is never black and white.

[–] raskal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 34 minutes ago

My Kia EV has plant based leather seats. I'm not saying they're good seats though

Geopolitics. Coal is available in tons of places and cheap to use and extract.

[–] scheep@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Money mostly. It generates a lot of profit and it costs money to switch. In many of countries oil, gas, etc. are like a huge portion of their GDP. It's like trying to get people to eat less meat. It would be better and more environmentally friendly, but everyone is too dependent on meat.

[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This dependence on meat is mostly imaginary.

[–] scheep@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PetteriSkaffari@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, I remember. But how important is that?

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

Because a cabal of evil rich people are holding the human race hostage so they can extract money from everyone so they can rape children on private islands.

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They is used because of ignorance

[–] uienia@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Correction, because a group of rich and powerful vested interests exploit that ignorance for shortsighted profit.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 22 hours ago

There are a couple of things about battery storage, a grid built on renewables needs ride through capacity and it needs to be able to meet surges in demand. In fact all grids do. Batteries do that and remove the need for hot standby gas generators but at the moment due to lack of capacity, not all fossil fuel generators. A lot of focus is on batteries as the backup for loss of wind or sun, the spread of renewables over a large geographical area and interconnected grids provides greater assurance.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Established supply chain, workforce knowledge. Energy density. Ease of use.

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The cost of the raw material is low enough to make it a viable option for the time being. There are also costs associated with switching to renewable options, which makes the transition slower.

Think of it from the perspective of a coal plant owner. You’ve already spent millions into construction and maintenance, so you really want some return on that investment.

When the plant reaches its end of life, that’s usually the best time to start considering other options. If the running costs rise dramatically or you are required to modernize the plant, that could be another time to take a look at other options.

BTW this is the reason why environmental legislation is so important. Companies listen to money, and governments decide what makes economic sense and what doesn’t.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 18 points 2 days ago

Energy density and entrenched profit structures are big ones for sure. :/

[–] shice@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Most if not all power used is generated almost instantly as needed. So when you look at solar (which is a great renewable) you run into the fact that it only generates power while the sun is out, and a specific amount of power.

This causes the problem of, how do you generate power at night and what do you do on rainy days or if a cloud covers the panels. You can substitute this with other renewable energy sources: wind, hydro, and nuclear, but wind has similar issues as solar and hydro and nuclear have huge upfront costs and take years to build.

So this is where coal and natural gas come in. Coal has the downside of being really bad for the environment but can start up within 10ish minutes of being needed. Gas is better for emissions (not great), but takes more time to startup.

A lot of companies use a mix of things along with buying and selling power with other companies (similar to a stock market). There are thoughts of trying to store power or looking at small scale nuclear plants.

Solar chart through the day:

Image

Power use throughout the day:

Image

Source: I work for a large power company

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That’s where batteries and other storage systems come into play.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, people are working on it.

The EIA estimates that there's about 30 GW of battery capacity in the U.S., mostly in storage systems that are designed to store about 1-4 hours worth.

That's in comparison to 1,200 GW of generation capacity, or 400 times as much as there is storage.

It's coming along, but the orders of magnitude difference between real-time supply and demand and our capacity for shifting some of the power just a few hours isn't quite ready for load balancing across a whole 24 hour day, much less for days-long weather patterns or even seasonality across the year. We're probably gonna need to see another few years of exponential growth before it starts actually making a big impact to generation activity.

[–] shice@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ya! And there is a lot of research and investment into them. The problem is they lose capacity over time from being powered and drained (think phone batteries and other lithium batteries).

From what I know hydro batteries are actually really big with power companies. Basically pumping a bunch of water uphill when you have excess power, then using the reservoir like a hydro plant when you need power. They are really inefficient, but work surprisingly well at storing a lot of power

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They were still more expensive than fossil power on standby last time I looked.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Money, They cornered the market and then they started yielding the profits from it to exert political influence. That's why molten Salt Thorium Reactors were abandoned by american scientists in the 60s. With nuclear power it would mean the end of for profit energy consumption. That plus the surveillance network of the billionaire class is what's fueling all of the political tensions and far-right (See Fascism) around the world. Denmark is already capable of producing over 140% of its daily energy usage through wind alone. The guardian wrote an article about it in 2015. Wind is still less than 1% of all global energy production. Alberta gets 300 days of sun a year, but have been brainwashed by big oil to invent and reflexively disavow any information otherwise. Then the fossil fuel industry and tech industry launched the Brexit disinformation campaign to weaken the EU that same year. With the advent of China as well as Copenhagen Atomics producing working prototype reactors capable of producing staggeringly vast amounts of energy with less than 1000x the nuclear waste of traditional light water reactors, the change is inevitable. That's what all of this is for them the war in Ukraine, Trump, Italy, Romania. It's the fossil fuel industry. With the advent of nuclear power, the obviousness of the effects of climate change and advanced battery technology, the only way they can ensure a continuous demand is war. There are no electric tanks. Russia is a petro state, Saudi Arabia is a petro state, trump is trying to turn the US into an authoritarian petro state. It's oil, they are the reason for all of this bullshit. Coal power plants are the most dangerous form of energy production, they kill approximately 1,000,000 people a year. We've had the technology to move away from them for over 70 years. That's 70,000,000 dead people. That is more people than died in the entire second world war and we aren't even talking about it because we'd rather just fall into arguing about transgenderism online than actually stopping them. It all goes back to fossil fuels.

[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think the average person truly understands exactly how much of the stuff they use every single day is a byproduct of the petroleum industry.

The obvious ones are oils as lubricants and fuel to burn for vehicles, but it goes soooooooooc much further than that.

Here are some quick examples of things many people do not realize use petroleum byproducts in one way or another.

So while we very well may be able to stop using traditional fuel to run vehicles in the future we still have to find alternatives for a lot of other things. The industry is not going anywhere anytime soon.

[–] br3d@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thing is, a lot of these aren't that bad? Making an oxygen mask feels really different to just setting fire to the fossil fuel to shift a 3-ton vanity pickup truck half a mile to Starbucks. And lots of the others can readily be replaced. Clothes, for example: rayon from bamboo can replace a lot of polyester and nylon

[–] MoreFPSmorebetter@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah we have stuff that can outright replace a lot of these things but for mist there is nothing else we have that can take over.

We are heavily dependent on oil even as we try to shift away from fuel as out primary means of transportation.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Source

the transformation takes time ;-)

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The correct answer.

Yes, yes, fossil fuel companies have a lot of political influence and are actively hindering the adoption of clean technology. But also, the world uses a lot of energy, and it takes time to build the capacity in renewables to make headway. More money would make things faster, but there is no real monetary incentive right now.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

but there is no real monetary incentive right now.

dude, solar energy is literally the cheapest form of energy right now. there is a real monetary incentive.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 5 hours ago

Cheapest to collect and use there and then? Sure, out of all new power generation.

But when it comes to using the power when it’s needed most, solar is very expensive because….well it produces nothing when the sun goes down and people need power. It then relies on storage, which is expensive.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

But you know what is cheaper than building a bunch of new solar? Not building that solar and continuing to use the coal plant that already exists. Hence the need to price CO2eq so that the coal plant is paying out the ass and becomes non-viable.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 days ago

Renewable power is increasing, yes, but power demand is also increasing. Most of the power to run those electric engines is still being generated by coal. Solar panels are actually kinda energy-intensive to produce, too, and most of that energy is also coming from coal.

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Swapping entirely to renewable energy is cool and all but not as easy as "just use a bunch of solar panels???" The issue is that most renewables are some mix of a: unreliable, and b: geographical.

Wind isn't going to be blowing 24/7 in most places, so wind is unreliable. The sun isn't always shining in most places, so solar power is unreliable. Hydro is amazing if you have it, but it isn't the kind of thing you can just build anywhere. Geothermal is also great if you have it, but again isn't the kind of thing you can just build.

Meanwhile, the power grid requires reliability. It's incredibly important. The obvious kneejerk response is "but batteries?" which would work and all but you're basically suggesting we produce enough power during the day to cover usage overnight, which is a tall order. There's also the fact that the kind of battery banks we're talking about would be ruinously expensive, and probably some amount of dangerous.

Also, like other people have said: coal/gas are cheap and ubiquitous. Both of those words might as well be synonyms for 'more money'. Realistically, that's the primary reason.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

cheap and easy.

It's many thousands of years of solar power , concentated in to a storable, portable and fairly accessible and transmutable form.

Countries don't "generate" coal and oil, they suck it out of the ground. It was generated by thousands to millions of years of life and accumulated geological processes.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

cheap and easy.

My Gen X ass is obligated to respond "like your mom?"

Fossil fuels are actually older than the dinosaurs. Oil and gas form from ancient algae type organisms. Coal is from ancient tree type organisms.

I say type because they only resemble those, and aren't closely related.

[–] un_aristocrate@jlai.lu 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because it is still the least expensive power source

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago

I think you're under estimated how much fossil fuel are used and the electricity production from solar and wind farm.

It's definitely possible to replace all fossil fuel by electricity, but it's a massive shift involving multiple nuclear power plants (or the green equivalent which is even more expensive/complicated) , not a few windfarm and solar panel over the parking lot. And today there is no political will to do such massive investment, let alone the NIMBY

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I don't have the to write up a full explanation bc I am at the grocery store but this video covers it well Why Capitalism Loves Fossil Fuels

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I recently set up some solar panels. Turned them on very close to noon. Well, look at that! So much power! Four hours later, i was getting 10 percent of that number.

I know that solar power levels change throughout the day. But when it’s put into concrete terms like “I can run my refrigerator on this … oh, only for 2 hours a day” it helped me really understand.

So to answer your question - we use fossil fuels in the grid to as a disposable battery to handle changes in demand and times when renewables aren’t available.

As for EVs - many train routes aren’t electrified. EV trucks are impractical for long-haul, and the infrastructure is nowhere to be seen. Even in EV friendly areas, it’s hard to find a charger that is easy to reach with a heavy-haul truck. That’s before we talk about whether there’s trucks to drive, and the cost of the truck. For individuals, an EV is simply beyond the finances of many people. Road trips are an edge case, but some people travel a lot for work and can’t afford to stop every 3 hrs for 30-60 min, if the charger is available, and twice as often in winter.

We are making progress on every front.

[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

At least here (germany) its lobbyism and stability
the only way that fossils can compete to "basically free energy after setup" is that there is a law or something that raises the prices of renewables to that of fossils so that fossils can compete
also coal gets taxmoney to make it cheaper

fossil energy plants also cant like be put on or off at any time. They often need a day on start or something so if one turns them off they are off for a while.
so they are used as a "baseline" while renewables can be put on or down depending on need (or run extra low to increase energy prices but psssss as they are not allowed to do so)

load more comments
view more: next ›