this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
423 points (99.1% liked)

Not The Onion

16782 readers
1689 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 142 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The whole world had largely ignored trump's renaming of the mexican gulf

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Uh, guys, isn't fascism supposed to be all efficient, and bureaucratic and shit?

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

No. The Nazis lied about everything they did. The autoban was under way before hitler. Anything good was basically already under way. The pieces of shit lie about everything if you have yet to notice.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They probably also likely removed it, because if you open your browser's debug window, it identifies clearly that T-Mobile is the backing carrier, not "the big three carriers" like they claim. It's T-Mobile's classic MVNO coverage map, if one is familiar with it (which will include possible roaming on other carriers, so they're not "lying"...)

That coverage site is also running on a very old system, IIRC, so good luck finding an engineer that still works there and knows how to fix it to "update" the gulf.

(Cell nerd deets, Mango-Mobile is using Liberty Wireless as their backing MVNO, which is an MVNO on T-Mobile's infra. Liberty was also already terrible. MVNO's are virtual cell carriers that live on real ones. It is NOT using Verizon, AT&T, or even Dish, except possibly in the case of roaming agreements.)

T-Mobile also use Muskrat's Starlink as their mediocre sat-to-cell service, and they also leveraged Mango's position in his first term to push through M&A's to acquire 5G spectrum to artificially accelerate/cheat past the others. John Legere fans, cover your ears, he actually went to Mango's FCC quite a bit to get this going.

tl;dr: probably a good idea to add T-Mobile to the boycott list next time one's looking for cell service. (As well, any T-Mobile MVNO like Mint, MetroPCS, etc. Here's an MVNO List that can be sorted by host network.)

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Ugh. I'm on on of T-Mobile's MVNO's. Unfortunately, it's not like Verizon or AT&T are morally superior. What's a guy to do?

Remind me why we allowed this much consolidation of the industry?

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Because polticians are simultaneously too stupid to understand the problems they must regulate and too greedy to want to understand them.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

Remind me why we allowed this much consolidation of the industry?

because telecom is somewhat of a natural monopoly (cables for sure; wireless less so, but for wireless you still need cables and spectrum)

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Problem is, T Mobile bought so many other carriers that their coverage is unbeatable in the US. I've been all over the entire country and had coverage everywhere others with competing carriers didn't. That's anecdotal I suppose, but I'm afraid to switch to a carrier with worse coverage.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

T-Mobile doesn't work everywhere, but nobody does. There's a town in Tennessee that I visited for work twice last year, and the moment I got to my destination, I lost coverage. If I wanted to make a call, I haf to drive a couple miles down the road.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

That's fair. I was definitely exaggerating, but I do know I had coverage in much more of the country than the people I traveled with.

[–] chaosCruiser@futurology.today 28 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I have a feeling that we’ll be seeing more news like this one. Like the phone thing is just one huge scandal waiting to happen. Looking forward to seeing that spectacular crash. 🍿

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 13 points 20 hours ago

I feel like the Trump administration has moved beyond scandals at this point. Scandals are just the ocean in which it swims. The emoluments clause is dead, buried, and completely forgotten. Other parts of the constitution are still hanging around in tatters, people are noticing some of that, but run of the mill scandal is not relevant.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But White House press secretary Caroline Levitt said that it's an "indisputable fact" that the body of water is called the Gulf of America!

Surely she wouldn't lie, would she? /s

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

I actually think she's not lying. I think she is a True Believer, fully in the Trump Distortion Field. She fully believes the insane things she says.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Next you’re going to tell me people aren’t signing on to “Arabian Gulf”

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This one hasn't passed yet, when it does it'll bring whole new levels of mockery.

[–] kerntucky@infosec.pub 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

OMG, seriously?

"This bill authorizes the President to enter into negotiations with the government of Denmark to purchase or otherwise acquire Greenland. The bill also renames Greenland as Red, White, and Blueland."

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 18 hours ago

Ah yes, let's piss off the counties that have strategic importance