this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
826 points (94.8% liked)

196

3782 readers
1193 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 237 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Trump is a felon, so I am not sure "lawful" is the best fit.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The lawful/chaotic axis represents a person's willingness to follow an external set of rules against their own instincts or opinions. Having a pocket judge or a pocket president to legitimize one's actions does not make that person lawful.

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump isn't a felon... He's a multi-felon.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Also ~~a convicted rapist~~ found responsible in a civil rape trial.

Pedants.

[–] rustyfish@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People who multi class are the worst.

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

true. that's why i play pathfinder

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EpeeGnome@feddit.online 8 points 1 week ago

Because calling him a proven-in-court-but-technically-not-convicted-because-it-was-a-civil-trial rapist takes too long.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In the interest of accuracy, none of Trump's 34 convictions were for rape.

He was found to be a rapist as a statement of fact in a civil lawsuit, but that's not a conviction.

So while he is a convicted felon 34 times over, and a rapist, he's not a convicted rapist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lauha@lemmy.one 25 points 1 week ago

Musk is definitely not lawful either. Must is pure chaotic evil

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

He's definitely chaotic evil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A couple of them might be chaotic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 48 points 1 week ago

Yeah, there is a convicted felon and an illegal immigrant right there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fun fact none of them are lawful

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 37 points 1 week ago

They paid congress a lot of money to say that they actually are lawfull

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

In the d&d alignment chart they are because capitalists have no inherent power outside of the laws that enforce their property. Devils in D&D will always break the rules(and rebel) if they think they can get away with it.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Huh? Devils are the corporate "trap you in fineprint and kill you with subclauses" type of evil. They are the ones who sell you the monkey's paw and come to collect your soul no matter how it shakes out. Catching them in airtight clauses (or narrow loopholes) is famously how you screw over devils.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hahahahaha Hahaha haha "Lawful"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump is more Chaotic Evil

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Facts. D&D defines the chaotic/lawful divide as whether or not the character abides by a code, ethos, or set of rules. So not "Law" in the "Legal Eagle Law Team" kind of way. Chaotic Evil characters don't really play by any rules, are unpredictable, and are just plain the worst.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago

It's why he's not a billionaire. Zing!

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd put Trump and Musk into 'chaotic'

Definitely evil though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Laser@feddit.org 32 points 1 week ago

As in can dictate law

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago

As in “full of law”

Like, just jam-packed stuffed to the gills with law, to the point where they vomit law out into the world and we all boil to death slowly in their law-infused stomach acid

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This only counts because they use their money to make their lives "lawful" through legislation and capture of the courts, minimizing their very real crimes against humanity.

Okay perhaps Buffett, Gates, and Cook haven't gone as far as actual crimes against humanity but the rest have, and Buffett, Gates, and Cook are still unlawful but used their money to twist the laws in their favor.

[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

By definition you can not get this rich without stealing the value of peoples labour - at scale.

Aka evil as shit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

unless by lawful you mean they manipulate the law however they please with their money and connections, then no.

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

You miss the point of the law

[–] SuperNovaStar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

um, yeah. that's literally the difference.

lawful evil is "evil in a suit and tie" while chaotic evil is "monstrous, uncivilized evil."

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

That's the entire schtick of lawful evil. Manipulation, extortion, background deals, and all that.

[–] laserm@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

Nah, don't forget that DJT is a convicted felon.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i feel like it should be more chaotic evil

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Ah but they're the ones that make the laws.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] psud@aussie.zone 14 points 1 week ago

Remember there's the neutral axis

Some are chaotic neutral. They're not out to wreck stuff, they just don't care if they do

[–] Nounka@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Some off them i see more as unfawfull ( when noboddy is looking ) evil

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Bill does some genuinely good stuff. I'm sure he does some bad stuff too though.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 week ago

there's a book about that, "no such thing as a free gift: the gates foundation and the price of philanthropy"

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's actually pretty interesting some of the effects his philanthropic efforts have had.

I think the bottom line is that billionaires shouldn't exist, all said and done.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

billionaires shouldn't exist, all said and done.

Absolutely agreed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now he's got his he is. In the 80-00 he was as nasty a fucker as all the rest are now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago

Dude was actually best friends with Jeffery Epstein. Like he wanted to hang out with him casually in New York.

[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GhostPain@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I see you wisely chose to leave Taylor Swift off of your chart.

No one wants the Swifties on their asses. :D

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Funny to live in times when Villains are in power. Probably in 2060s they will compare them with Hitler.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›