this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
1146 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

71842 readers
4266 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Hours after the US airstrike on Iranian territory, Iranian-backed hackers took down US President Donald Trump’s social media platform.
  • Users were struggling to access Truth Social in the early morning following the alleged hack.
  • As the US continues to insert itself into the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, the US government believes more cyberattacks could happen.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

they have to start differentiating a ddos attack from an actual breach. one is far more interesting than the other

[–] bytesonbike@discuss.online 11 points 6 hours ago

I work in tech and I hate it when non-security people talk about it.

It's really painful to read about "a new hack that can affect billions of accounts" from a source, only to learn its some new social phishing method.

[–] DevotedShitStain69@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Iran is kinda goated for this not gonna lie!

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Iran pls hack Elon Musk's Twitter account and post "I'm a mean old Nazi who sucks ass at Path of Exile 2"

No, post an unhinged rant where he doesn't say he's a nazi, but he talks in detail about how he sucks at video games phrased as bragging, then shits on gamers for noticing, and says a buncha shit like the 14 words and junk.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Does that game have swords yet? Last time I played, not all classes were there.

[–] Amonverite@lemmy.ca 8 points 14 hours ago

Not just Elon's account, shut the whole site down!

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago

...we need a hack to prove that?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 109 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm still at a loss for words thinking that any real human people joined truth social. We really failed as a species...

Fascists arent people. Antifa osint people joined to watch.

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Equally upsetting. The site is truthsocial.com not truth.social

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Someone should buy truth.social and make it redirect to something trump's base hates.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Really you should have it direct to a clone of the site, but with fake accounts pushing whatever agenda you want.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

Lol. Lmao, even

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 95 points 1 day ago (9 children)
[–] Sinthesis@lemmy.today 2 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago)

The word "hack" is pre-internet. A "hack" journalist or a "hack job" is basically something unprofessional. It is movies that turned "hackers" into someone that gained access to the "mainframe". In the realm of computer systems, I would argue that a "hack" is doing anything the system was not intended/designed to do. A successful DoS or DDoS needs to find some component of the system that wasn't designed to handle the amount of traffic about to be sent to it.

There are protections for DDoS (iptables, fail2ban, Cloudflare and so on), you have to figure out a way around them, that's a hack.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I'd start with the following, and refine if necessary:

"Gaining unauthorized access to a protected computer resource by technical means."

  • Port scanning --> Not hacking because there isn't any access to resources gained*
  • Using default passwords that weren't changed --> Not hacking because the resource wasn't protected*
  • Sending spam --> Not hacking because there isn't any access to resources gained
  • Beating the admin with a wrench until he tells you the key --> Not hacking because it's not by technical means.
  • Accessing teacher SSN's published on the state website in the HTML --> Not hacking because the resource wasn't protected, and on the contrary was actively published**
  • Distributed denial of service attack --> Not hacking because there isn't any access to resources gained

* Those first two actually happened in 2001 here in Switzerland when the WEF visitors list was on a database server with default password, they had to let a guy (David S.) go free
** The governor and his idiot troupe eventually stopped their grandstanding and didn't file charges against Josh Renaud of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter, luckily

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

When my parents kicked me out, the number of times o got to sleep inside because i could convince people i was the county password inspector was more than zero. It's hacking.

Wrench? No. But an old colleague informs me that the version done with a machete does count as hacking. I concur.

Those are both way more useful than exploiting a lazy coder's fuckup, renaming 'house of many backdoors' to 'that package everyone uses in everything' on github, or some fancy math shit.

Your laws are nonsense bullshit, they're just excuses for power and I'd appreciate you not defiling language fof the rest of us to justify them.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Those are both way more useful than exploiting a lazy coder’s fuckup

I never said social engineering, physical breaching, exerting force on people, and other ways of compromising systems weren't useful. They just aren't hacking to me, otherwise the term is too broad to be very useful.

You're free to come up with your own definition, I was asked to define it and that's my best shot for now.

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I think a better definition would be "achieve something in an unintended or uncommon way". Fits the bill on what generally passes in the tech community as a "hack" while also covering some normal life stuff.

Getting a cheaper flight booked by using a IP address assigned to a different geographical location? Sure I'd call that a life hack. Getting a cheaper flight by booking a late night, early morning flight? No, those are deliberately cheaper

Also re: your other comment about not making a reply at all, sometimes for people like us it's just better to not get into internet fights over semantics (no matter how much fun they can be)

Your definition is probably better. I can very much vibe with that.

Mitnick mostly social engineered. Most of the big famous attacks at least involved a component of that.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Oh man.

My comment was intended to imply that the term "hacking" defies definition because it has been grossly overused and misconstrued over many decades.

Sure you might be able to convey what it means to you but of course it means different things to everyone else, with each definition being equally appropriate.

Er go, any discussion is one of semantics.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You know my first instinct wast to reply with: "No."

Maybe I should have stuck with that. I had a feeling this would lead nowhere.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 33 minutes ago

I had a feeling this would lead nowhere.

precisely the point I was trying to make.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 281 points 1 day ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 217 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Unclear from the article but, while a bit pedantic, this sounds more like it was potentially a DDoS attack rather than a proper "hack".

[–] uninvitedguest@lemmy.ca 127 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

In an age where "willfully giving out your account password" is called hacking, here I'd call it tomato or tomato.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 122 points 1 day ago (50 children)

It feels weird to be in support of the goals of an Iranian hacker group.

load more comments (50 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 24 points 1 day ago

Is this how we find out that Truth Social was running even harder on hopes and dreams than 4chan was?

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 124 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And nothing of value was lost.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 67 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Thankfully only DDos. Truth Social is Mastodon so a security flaw could have been a real problem.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 97 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Might be smart for Iran to just attack trump’s businesses as retribution for the bombings; if they attack the military, we’ll surely get pulled into another war, but just going after trump’s businesses will probably avoid a military response and maybe will make republicans come around to the fact that he should have divested himself from his businesses when he became president.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›