makes sense if you've read: https://www.itmagazine.ch/artikel/87259/Cloud_Act_in_Aktion_Microsoft_haendigt_Daten_von_Beamten_an_USA_aus.html (german)
freeman
Use every day:
- Feeder (RSS, kinda awkward to sort the feeds but really nice to use, if you use it like I do)
- Grayjay (for YT and some other sources)
- CoMaps (best simple OSM Client)
- Track Work Time (very good time tracker if you have to track your time for sth)
- NFC Alarm Clock (simply the best alarmclock, I dont even use the NFC part)
Useful/Cool:
- Arcticons (Iconpack for all of the apps)
- Birday (pretty little Birthday Database)
- Breakout 71 (game: roughelike Breakout. I like it more than I like to admit it)
- Catima (wallet for QR Codes/PDFs)
Further (obvious ones or useful things I use once a week or less) KDE Connect, LocalSend, Pixelix (Pixelfed Client), Signal, Thunderbird, StreetComplete
schön, man muss die Populisten in der Lokalpolitik packen: Denn dort können mit relativ wenig Aufwand Dinge bewirkt werden. Dort kann man nicht nur populistisch reden sondern muss was machen und umsetzen.
very reasonable I can recommend the newest Atrioc video about this spacex IPO. sorry, its only on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krOEMBqwicM
idk about the culture where you live, but for me it would be quite the disrespect by them. But it depends if it was a "yes, I'll come" for pure politeness. Or if it is sincere. But anyways, its ridiculous.
Or have you put in the wrong date? :D
its because america spent years to confuse socialist/democratic/leftist... with the overarching evil and ominous communist (red scare)
so even the "left" thinking people confuse it
Yes, you yould make the argument that it is impossible to know that there is no god, as the existence of a god is unfalsifiable. But if your definition of agnostic is this strict, then noone is really an agnostic atheist, because you cannot know that there isnt a very quiet and passive god which doesnt intervene on earth after Jesus. Its just not falsifiable. So if someone examines all arguments by scholars and the most avid theists for a god and comes to the conclusion that they are all bad/not good enough, then I'd argue that this person is a gnostic atheist. Because what else is one supposed to take to become gnostic? You cannot make scientific experiments to prove that there is no god.
Offtopic: What in gods name is that wiki? https://hmolpedia.com/page/Main_Page I understand almost every word but dont get the combination of them at all. Am I crazy?
gnostic or agnostic, atheists are just not convinced. Like I dont believe you, that you have a unicorn at home. If I am gnostic or agnostic about that matter isnt really too important to anyone.
because to consider yourself a "gnostic atheist" you need to do some amount of research, consider the arguments for a god (or the regionally modt believed in god(s)) and then come to the conclusion that all of the arguments are not convincing. You can still be unconvinced after an honest examination of course and consider yourself an agnostic. But from my experience most agnostics are just indifferent to the whole question about gods, so they naturally dont have a strong opinion about it and dont voice it.
ja, deshalb möchte ich ja keine super isolierende Kopfhörer mit aktiver Geräuschunterdrückung, sondern etwas ausserhalb vom Ohr, dass das Ohr eben freibleibt
the us neeeds a general strike for a new election system that allows for more parties and higher taxes for the richest 0.1%