this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
829 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

17312 readers
1346 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

‘For those of us with nothing to fear, the truth can’t come soon enough,’ the actor shared on X

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago

I mean, it's the one time he's guaranteed to not be named in a sexual assault case, so why not?

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 47 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"My computer recently crashed and I've lost all my friends' email addresses."

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 16 points 6 days ago

I think it's more like Epstein specialized in girls

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 51 points 6 days ago (1 children)

probably becauses hes into male minors. and not female like most of the pedophiles/ephebophiles out there.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 91 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's just a synonym for libertarian.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 23 points 6 days ago

That's so funny

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It's a distinction some make, where pedophiles go for the kid kids, like prepubescent, where ephebophiles want the ones who have at least started puberty but are still kids.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Hold my beer, it's even more complicated

  • Infantophiles go for 0-5 (up until developed consciousness)
  • Pedophiles ~6-beginning of puberty
  • Hebephiles - going through puberty
  • Ephebophiles - after puberty but before adulthood
  • Teleiophiles - 18-late 30s
  • Mesophiles - 40s-60s
  • Gerontophiles - 70+

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia

Don't ask me why I know, I just like getting to the grit of things.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm going to accuse some people of being Teleiophiles and Mesophiles.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey and Dustin Hoffman walk into an Irish pub.

The bartender sighs, "Oh no, not Yewtree again..."

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm wondering what kind of international incident this will cause. Who else is in there, it can't be just Americans?

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Rich people are not an America-only issue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

Anything to ratchet up the pressure on that orange toddler is welcomed.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

my personal objection.

releasing the Epstein's files will include people he wanted to target but never got anywhere.

however, it would be very clear that those people are innocent, and they're will be people in the files that were clearly diddling children.

Either the files should be released in full and the only consequence for people who casually met Epstein and never interacted with him will be some conspiracy nuts harassing them. or at worse censor the list for those names.

Also, just because there isn't a file named "Epstein's client list.docx" doesn't mean there isn't info about his clients.

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"just because there isn't a file named "Epstein's client list.docx" doesn't mean there isn't info about his clients."

Exactly, this focus on a "list" drives me crazy. If detectives investigating a murder don't find a piece of paper with the victim's name on it in the killer's possession, they don't throw their hands up and say, damn he got away with it.

Epstein's entire business model revolved around having receipts on his clients, that's how he stayed out of prison for decades, and it's why they are covering it up now. This isn't a conspiracy theory, it's a supressed criminal investigation.

the conspiracy is about who (we know who) and why (we know why) the criminal investigation is being suppressed.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago

people he wanted to target but never got anywhere.

All it'll do is make a list of probabilities.

If you were caught having sex with an intern, AND you were in Epstein's book, it just has a higher chance. However, he's more likely to go after someone who has been publicly caught.

The black book isn't as interesting as the redacted information in the court papers. Sealed details about the official testimony are going to be far more damning than his little black book.

Also, there may be stuff like flight logs of personal accounts putting people in bad places.

[–] javiwhite@feddit.uk 13 points 6 days ago (3 children)

He saw Stephen King get called a nonce for claiming the list didn't exist and saw an opportunity.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 17 points 6 days ago

Oh, King's for sure on that list if he's saying that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 15 points 6 days ago

Soup be thickening.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

of all the people you'd think would be on the list

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

Guess he wasn't invited.

load more comments
view more: next ›